It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

12/12/12 UFO Picture taken on Hong Kong flight

page: 5
51
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 01:50 PM
link   
reply to post by dankojudd
 


When I first looked at it I thought wow, what a great and clear picture. Something that is hard to find when it comes to UFO photo's that are proported to be real.

Then I thought I would play around with brightness, highlight, shadow and contrast settings and came across something interesting. It could just be an image artifact but it looks as though there is a copy and paste style box around the object.

It's hard to make out but appears as white lines, the lines are not stratight cut but are there -

What do you guys think?







It's either been pasted into the original photo or... the white lines could be a shield of some type...



edit on 18-12-2012 by Havick007 because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 01:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by pcchris

Originally posted by pacifier2012
Wow, to think there are still some 1950's styled UFO's still about.

How Retro
How Classic

I bet those ones will be worth heaps more on Argos than the new ones.

They'll be collectors items in some galaxy!





And they're looking at us like haa! those earthlings are still rolling around on 4 doors and 4 wheels....that just may be their design preference discs..:sidenote:...far as I know theyre are only 3 forms rods, discs and triangles....the triangle ufo may be from another race also Ive never seen any actual daytime photos of a triangle ufo just discs...i think the triangle types we see are just small fleets of discs or orbs types locked in formation...
edit on 18-12-2012 by pcchris because: (no reason given)
But at least our models change. The Chevy of 1947 does not look like the chevy of today. One would think that the aliens would embrace that unibody construction that produces that sleek look but they still use nuts and bolts and havent changed since 1947.



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 01:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeaAndStrumpets

I don't understand. A few posts prior to the above, you stated: "Only when I see something with my own eyes that without a shadow of a doubt is extra-terrestrial, will I believe that they have visited Earth."

With no sarcasm at all (though a little consternation), I ask ... why would you trust your own eyes any more than those of the thousands of obviously credible people who claim to have seen just what you describe?


I remember seeing a UFO when I was about 7 years old star gazing one summer night. I remember staring at the multi-colored flashing lights circling around on a somewhat disc shaped object hovering about 2 KM from my backyard for about 15 mins or so.

So the truth in me says I saw one flying object which was unknown to me. But I must agree with you on your argument:

why would you trust your own eyes any more than those of the thousands of obviously credible people who claim to have seen just what you describe?

Your point can also be turned around by asking the simple question....WHY NOT????



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 01:53 PM
link   
reply to post by pillock
 


Yeah takes a while. Like 10 whole seconds. Thats a lifetime for some lifeforms. But if a UFO is outside my plane I think I will forfeit those 10 seconds and try to get the shot anyway.



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 01:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Havick007
reply to post by dankojudd
 


When I first looked at it I thought wow, what a great and clear picture. Something that is hard to find when it comes to UFO photo's that are proported to be real.

Then I thought I would play around with brightness, highlight, shadow and contrast settings and came across something interesting. It could just be an image artifact but it looks as though there is a copy and paste style box around the object.

It's hard to make out but appears as white lines, the lines are not stratight cut but are there -

What do you guys think?





It's either been pasted into the original photo or... the white lines could be a shield of some type...

edit on 18-12-2012 by Havick007 because: (no reason given)


Nice add to the evidence for or against the UFO.


I took the original picture and inverted the colors on it to see if any edits were found around the object. Here is what I found.




posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
 


With the inverted color, it looks as though there is a faint square box around the object as well.



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:01 PM
link   
reply to post by CyberTruth
 


I have never seen a chip in a plane window ! Are they allowed to fly with the plane compromised like that? Couldnt that be a problem when the cabin is pressurised?



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:03 PM
link   
reply to post by karen61560
 


I couldnt see a chip?? Although I think the windows a double layered, the inside layer is more like perspex. The outer layer protects the cabin against pressure. The outer layer is seperate from the layer you can touch inside the cabin.



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by JohnnyAnonymous
My most prioritized problem is the shadows and the Sun's reflection on the plane.. versus whats on the UFO (or actually more correctly.. whats not on the UFO).

I agree with this, as well as the fact that the object appears to be too sharpy defined, particularly its edges, compared to the rest of the stuff in the photo, suggesting that it was shopped in.

Otherwise, like all UFO photos, good or bad, without other evidence it stands alone as a curiosity that doesn't prove or disprove anything.



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Havick007
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
 


With the inverted color, it looks as though there is a faint square box around the object as well.


Quite possible....here is a comparison of: inverted (enhanced by 500%) vs original (""" 500%) vs highlighted area (""200%)

So after the image enhancements, it doesn't appear there is a box, but what does appear unusual is that there are no window spots appearing on this object. So it could be quite possible the picture was added ontop of the photo with a bit of softening of the edges to make it appear as if it were behind the window?


edit on 18-12-2012 by Skywatcher2011 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:21 PM
link   
I viagely remember a very near exact duplicate craft photo...so close id say it was lifted from the origonal..
The craft seems oddly refelctive like they are slightly out of whack from where the reflections should be....
Mostly i think this is an earlier photo just inserted ....
Could be dead wrong but my take....
More photos would help the crdibility 1oo%



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by dankojudd
 


Interesting pictures..
I would love to see a on camera interview with the one that took the pictures..

Been playing around with Gimp, trying to spot a obvious hoax sign.. not found anything yet

Apart from a interesting aura like thing surrounding it





edit on 18-12-2012 by Spacespider because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
 


So after the image enhancements, it doesn't appear there is a box,

Look again. There is quite clearly a box visible in the center image (blue one) you displayed.



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:24 PM
link   
I think I can make out the photographers reflection in the top right of the photo...if this is a hoax its hoaxed pretty good



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
 


So after the image enhancements, it doesn't appear there is a box,

Look again. There is quite clearly a box visible in the center image (blue one) you displayed.




This box you all are claiming could very well be scratches on the window



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by pcchris
 


For sure, it can either be hoaxed pretty good or can't be real at all.
OR it can be real and not be hoaxed.
edit on 18-12-2012 by Shurima because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
 


So after the image enhancements, it doesn't appear there is a box,

Look again. There is quite clearly a box visible in the center image (blue one) you displayed.


I guess that is what I miss when I don't wear my glasses. Now that I have them on I still don't see a box but what I do notice now more clearly is the "smudging" around the object.

Something tells me this object was added into the window.....



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
 


You may be right, It could be some sort of transparent tape of some sort with an image behind.(Hence the sort of box line around it). But I can't seem to explain how the sunlight hits the object perfectly well.



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by stirling
I vaguely remember a very near exact duplicate craft photo...so close I'd say it was lifted from the original..

Yep, same thing I said a few pages back. It looks oddly familiar, but I haven't been able to find the original yet...



posted on Dec, 18 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by maryhinge
all you debunkers what you going to do if

you get to see one for yourself

poop your pants or claim its fake/cgi


I have heard that pants pooping is prevalent among true skeptics as they are certain they don't have to go and then SURPRISE...

I will however remain a bit skeptical with clean underwear, until I see more evidence. However that said, of the 700 unknowns in Project Blue Book several where of the "Classic Disc" variety.
edit on 18-12-2012 by abeverage because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join