12/12/12 UFO Picture taken on Hong Kong flight, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 51 times


reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 04:43 AM by fiftyfifty
reply to post by Krusty the Klown



See the last post on the previous page. It is quite possible that this flight existed but where are the other accounts?


reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 04:48 AM by Krusty the Klown
reply to post by fiftyfifty



You're right, for an entity that prominent, others on the flight should have seen it.

Seeing something like that on a plane is not something I would keep to myself if I was on this flight.



reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 06:39 AM by seabhac-rua
reply to post by upgrader



Considering that a UFO event is a rarity there are plenty of pictures of unknown aerial objects taken with camera phones out there.

Add to this that most phones have crappy cameras.

Add to this that when a genuine picture does surface most people dismiss it as either fake or something natural.

No offense, but the "with all the camera phones out there we should have more evidence" argument is not a very good one. The best UFO pictures have mostly been taken with SLR cameras, and it's self explanatory as to why they are better pictures. How many people do you see carrying around SLR's these days? Not as many as in the past. The digital age has reduced the quality of everyday photography, and that includes pictures of UFO's.


reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 07:15 AM by fiftyfifty
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
Originally posted by fiftyfifty

What I don't believe is that they are flying around our planet in spaceships in broad daylight at airliner altitudes with no intention to make themselves known having used all the energy and resources needed to reach us


The motives and MO's of supposed ET's or ED's have been the subject of years of debate and speculation. What remains is witness testimony, photographic and film evidence, government documentation released under FOI. The fact that whilst some government and military agencies deny having any interest in the subject they collect data for analysis, the fact that said agencies interview and debrief witnesses, the fact that they issue memorandums to downplay and ridicule the subject in the MSM. And this is just the tip of the iceberg, I would not dismiss this subject based upon your rationale.

Only when I see something with my own eyes that without a shadow of a doubt is extra-terrestrial, will I believe that they have visited Earth.


This is an impossibility, how could you ever be without a shadow of a doubt that something is ET?


- Witness testimony can easily be made up for various motivating reasons = low credibility
- Photographic and film evidence is not reliable as it either shows something that can't be explained because it is too blurry, dark or short to identify what we are actually looking at. Anything that looks clearly unlike anything known to be of Earth can be faked. In my opinion = ZERO credibility
- Govermnent documentation doesn't indicate any specific alien cases. Only admission that they haven't been able to identify certain objects. This doesn't rule our foreign military craft, weather phenomenon, hoaxes etc.

The rest of what you say is taking fact and blending it with your beliefs so it fits.

I rely on my eyes to tell me what is real and what is not and if I believe something is real after seeing it then that FOR ME is without doubt.


reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 07:24 AM by seabhac-rua
reply to post by fiftyfifty



Well, if you are so inclined you should do some research into the UFO subject because:

A. there are literally thousands of credible witness statements by professional people collected since and before the 40's.

B. There are excellent UFO pictures in the public domain. There is also lots of film

C. Have you read all government documentation regarding UFO's? Don't make unfounded assumptions.

The facts I state regarding government agencies are just that - facts, not my opinion.

You are entitled to take whatever stance suits you of course, but to me you are demonstrating your ignorance regarding this subject.


edit on 18-12-2012 by seabhac-rua because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 07:34 AM by fiftyfifty
reply to post by seabhac-rua



I am not denying that you've looked into the subject deeper than I have. However, I will stand by my view that even 'credible' witnesses can be mistaken and make things up. Our eyes can deceive us and when we can't make sense of something, we try to come up with a logical explanation. Unfortunately, everyones logic differs and we end up with wild claims.

I am aware of several unexplained events and I don't claim to be able to explain them myself and I am not interested in trying to 'debunk' I want to know the truth as much as the next man. However, I am yet to discover any piece of 'evidence' which makes me sit up and think "Wow - it can only be alien!".

I am not one for leaping to wild conclusions. If my mum told me to jump off a cliff into a safety net below, I'd want to see the safety net before I jumped despite her being 'credible' if you get what I mean?


reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 08:00 AM by xpoq47
reply to post by fiftyfifty



Star for your adding some substance to the thread. That Hong Kong Airlines Boeing 737-800 (B-KBE) photo certainly looks right.

When birds defecate in flight are they careful not to get it on airplanes? Is this unknown person's word good? It might be an alien touring vessel, but without more evidence, it might as well be bird poo on the window.


reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 08:19 AM by ThePeopleParty
reply to post by pacifier2012



If they was here in the 50s then there is nothing to say that the design of these crafts(if real) didn't peak hundreds of years ago, By the way how long have airoplanes had wings? they work so they keep em on planes.

Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by fiftyfifty



Well, if you are so inclined you should do some research into the UFO subject because:

A. there are literally thousands of credible witness statements by professional people collected since and before the 40's.

B. There are excellent UFO pictures in the public domain. There is also lots of film

C. Have you read all government documentation regarding UFO's? Don't make unfounded assumptions.

The facts I state regarding government agencies are just that - facts, not my opinion.

You are entitled to take whatever stance suits you of course, but to me you are demonstrating your ignorance regarding this subject.


edit on 18-12-2012 by seabhac-rua because: (no reason given)


I think it is time ATS changed its motto to embrace ignorance, as that is what most of the posters here seam to do now days.
edit on 18-12-2012 by ThePeopleParty because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 18-12-2012 @ 08:33 AM by theUNKNOWNawaits
Originally posted by pillock
reply to
post by upgrader


you have to turn your phones off when you fly.
Turning your phone on to get a picture takes a while


Whens the last time you flew?
Its called airplane mode on your cell and for most of the flight youre now allowed to use electronic devices so your cell might not be the only thing you could use to take a picture while on a plane (e.g., ipad).

But I do agree this looks fairly legit in my opinion
edit on 12/18/2012 by theUNKNOWNawaits because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Curiosity rover has photographed a new UFO
  Posted 13 days ago with 10 member flags
Criticism of Israel now a crime in California.
  Posted 2 days ago with 9 member flags
The power of greed can make you misspell even your own name...
  Posted 11 days ago with 7 member flags
Research into the Prophecies & Predictions of Billy Meier
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
Sky Portal Appears Over Arctic Facility
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Strange Wormhole Portal Appears Over Arctic Facility?
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags
The nuclear attack on the moon-did it REALLY happen?
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags