I come here to ATS to get insight on peoples thoughts and ideas about what it going on in the world today! Do I believe in everything I read here? Absolutly not!!! In my opinion, to be a member of this sight and complain that what you read is garbage and think it should be banned is nothing more than advocating censorship. What is wrong with just sharing your opinion if you do not accept the the theory and just move on! If you like to debate then have a sensible debate and if it goes nowhere for either view, call it what it is and be done with it! After all, isn't this what this sight is supposed to be about?
Originally posted by bknapple32
Sandy Hook on a map- Coincidence. This theory implies that Christopher Nolan somehow had knowledge two years in advance of the Newtown shooting. You really believe that?
MK-Ultra. Lanza was somehow the victim of mind control by the CIA. While I believe in MK Ultra and fully believe it existed in the CIA. There is not one shred of proof that Lanza had any contact with anyone even closely related to the CIA. Again, no proof.
When you make a thread, be able to defend your claims with evidence. If you cant, don't make a thread. Wait until you have something viable.
Just to let you know that you haven't debunked anything from purplemer. Why should I believe what you say is fact with no evidence to backup your claims.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
reply to post by purplemer
Right, so it couldn't have been some conspiracy theorist who put that message in Ducktails, right? Why would someone advertise like that? I thought this was supposed to be a secret organization and yet you think they advertise in Disney movies? So which is it, are they a secret organization hidden from public view, or are they advertising in kids cartoons to gain attentio? Do you not understand how stupid this is?
Lisa holding up the image of NY, with $9, you do know that the twin towers were an iconic landmark of NY right? Almost everything printed about NY in the 80's and 90's had the twin towrs on it, but now wherever that happened conspiracy theorists are claiming it was a "sign". It wasn't a sign, it was the landmark of a city being used to depict the damn city!
Then we have a grainy image of two large buildings, with something in the sky near them, and we're expected to believe this is evidence of something? What if it were a picture of the towers with a flock of birds flying towards it taken by a tourist on a sunny afternoon, would you scream that the birds MUST represent planes and that the tourists knew and planned everything!?
Neo's passport, has a date in it. Wow, no one had ever written that date before on anything at all, right? Imagine all those people out there with birthdays on Sept 11th, I wonder if they know they are all involved and are agents of the Illuminati too?! How about all those companies that included Sept 11th on their printed calendar's, they must be in on it because they used a date in something!
Jeez, it's like the date is supposed to have never existed before the attack
There you go, I have now debunked all the BS in one go, tell your therapist to thank me by making a donation to a mental health organization.
Originally posted by bknapple32
People are leaving ats not just because of the Newtown threads. It's a culmination of threads from a variety of topics that have no proof. Nothing to refute because they are all hunches.
Again. Don't care what you think of my op and how I wrote it. Others enjoyed it. And the difference? I question ops for the veracity of the claims made. You are questioning how I word things.
Originally posted by OneisOne
As to the Batman movie. Blah.... If people really understood how a movie that big gets made, they wouldn't be so quick to jump on the "it's sign!!!" bandwagon.
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by detachedindividual
Thank you for your reply. Is that what you call debunking a post. My granny past away 15 years ago. She could still do a better job of debunking.. The personal insult at the end referring to me as a mentalist is nothing more than a personal insult. Normally this occurs when someone has a disability to argue in a the context of a debate.