Disclaimer: This thread is not intended to trivialize or other wise disrespect the incredible grief being felt by recent shooting victims all over the
US. I think the Connecticut shooting was a horrible and insane act regardless of who is responsible. Get that - REGARDLESS OF WHO is responsible.
Please do not berate the OP for trying to have an honest discussion about the problem.
There must be a reason for these senseless mass shootings.
To simply blame them on guns is disingenuous.
To simply blame them on poor policies for dealing with the mentally unstable is disingenuous.
President Obama is correct – we need to have a serious discussion about it and soon.
This thread is an attempt to offer commentary related to that discussion…..
Most psychologists and law enforcement professionals will tell you that there a many, many reasons a person commits heinous acts of violence but the
victims almost always fall into two categories;
1. Someone(s) in close proximity during “the heat of the moment”. These are enacted on the closest possible targets when someone’s emotions get
the better of them. A “crime of passion”.
2. Someone(s) that represents a person or group that has wronged or committed some perceived injustice against the individual.
Recent shootings in Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Virginia, etc have spawned a new phenomenon – Random spree shootings involving people and
places seemingly unconnected to any perceived “offense” against the shooter.
Also recent shootings seem to offer a similar MO in that the shooter seems to have a seemingly inexplicable, rapid, unforeseen, or out of character,
break with reality.
Take off your “I’m a cornbread fed red blooded American Democrat / Republican / Libertarian” hat for a moment. To get this you have to think a
little differently. You have to perceive the US as not a “shining city on a hill” but as just another territory controlled and used for its
resources by the world military industrial empire. I’m not a big “NWO” believer, but consider the state of the world right now. Radical civil
unrest and outright revolution is rampant in many parts of the world. Economic instability and radical disparity in social and economic standing have
spread like a virus though out nearly every country. Radically change is on the March and there is no reason to believe this is not an organized
agenda. This type of change simply does not happen on such a wide scale spontaneously.
George H. W. Bush New World Order speech; en.wikisource.org...
IF, the NWO exists, and if they are implementing the NWO agenda, for it to work the radical elements of the world would have to be smoothed out and
sovereignty would have to be marginalized. Radical elements might include radical Islamic extremists but it would ALSO include nations whose citizenry
is radically wealthier than the rest of the world and ALSO whose citizenry possessed enough firearms to repel a good sized army for years.
IF you consider the possibility of the NWO agenda then you have to consider the possibility they may be acting to “smooth out the rough edges” of
the world economically, militarily and ideologically.
- Economic leveling: The 2008 economic crisis impacted all the worlds economies but massive wealth was lost from the citizenry of most of the
- Ideoligical and Military leveling: The “Arab Spring” has brought about regime change, marginalized some of the worlds most powerful militaries
not aligned to western NATO countries and is forcing even radical Islamic elements into becoming legitimate and more responsible world
- Marginalization of Sovereignty: To many instances to cite but a broad article is listed below.
That leaves the problem of guns in the hands of Americans.
The ONLY way to breach the Second Amendment gun rights would be if;
a. A Democrat controlled administration was in place
b. Acts so heinous occurred that the political climate would tolerate passing legislation that would first ban certain gun sales then use that law to
broaden gun restrictions and local authorities’ ability to confiscate weapons.
Those two events have occurred.
The Hypothesis of more than a few:
We might as well just come out and say what everyone is thinking in the back of their mind. Namely that the US government is somehow exposing
individuals to a drug or some other stimuli which allow them to imprint that persons mind with a death mission such as the recent mass shootings
across the US.
Is the government using mind control tactics or drugs on people that make them “Manchurian Zombies”, “self directed Kamikaze killers” or
[insert your own label here].
If you think the NWO scenarios above are plausible then this is not a stretch.
We know the US government has been experimenting with mind control since the creation of the CIA in the 1947. We also know that they were working on
aerosolized delivery methods as far back as 1951. Look how much technology has taken a quantum leap between then and now. Isn’t it reasonable to
believe that these mind control tactics have improved in a similar fashion? Is it unreasonable to think that these men in power wouldn’t do anything
including slaughter innocents (see operation Dormouse) to reach their goals?
Too many to list but here are a few with even more still classified:
You make your own judgements but I think we need to make sure we discuss the radical shift of these events from “crimes of passion” or
“revenge” killings to seemingly random spree killings that have convenient political overtones.