9/11 Vancouver hearings

page: 1
3

log in

join

posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 11:10 AM
link   
www.veteranstoday.com...

Any serious researcher may be interested in these hearings
any discussion could be fruitful.....but i fear the impetus for truth has diminished over time as we have moved on....
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)


Vancouer hearins part 2

www.veteranstoday.com...
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 11:12 AM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 


I'm failing to see the point here!


Must edit your OP!



posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 11:14 AM
link   
My keyboard is broken on the inside somehow and does wierd things from time to time....
incldung fat finger mistakes...it gets a bit frustrating ...link posted now bud....


I wasnt aware such a quantity of NUKE traces were found or analyzed from the WTC
rubble.................................................................................................................below.

Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.

Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.

Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.

Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.

Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.

Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.

Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal in the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.

Here we have some very telling evidence that some type of Nuclear Device may have been used to fell the WTC 1 and 2 buildings....
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)


At the link other plausible explanations are discussed and refuted by scientists who presented their reearch resuls.
Several hypothesies are discussed in detail, please do NOT post frivilously...read the material first.....
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 11:41 AM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 

Sorry, but after reading that article, there is very little there for a serious researcher. There is absolutely NO evidence of ANY kind of chemical explosives being used. Not to mention, all of those researchers omit the effects that a nuclear detonation would have had on the immeadiate area "mini" or "micro".



posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 




Here we have some very telling evidence that some type of Nuclear Device may have been used to fell the WTC 1 and 2 buildings....

All without an earth shattering kaboom?

As the cartoon says. "There should have been an earth shattering KABOOM!"

These hearings are biased toward the presenters point of view. I'm sure they will sell you a DVD.



posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 11:55 AM
link   
there are certainly some very interseting scenarios that are being put forward, all of them seem more likely than the official story. but as always it's just my opinion. star and flag op



posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 02:20 PM
link   
reply to post by josephamccoy
 




all of them seem more likely than the official story.

So a silent nuke seems more likely than a plane and fire?



posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 06:02 PM
link   
Actually a silent nuke IS more likely than the Goverment theory......
The radioactive evidence is intersting to find in the rubble ...what else could cause its presence?
Just asking......
Certainly many people have come forward with theories...scientists and laymen alike....
But the overwhelming majority of those who speak up....is that the goverment story is a physical impossibility.
This leaves open a space big enough to drive a whole pile of counter theories throug...and well it should...we still want to know....
The suspicions of over 50% of Americans are aroused and answers are not being forthcomming from those whos job it is to investigate such things......
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 



Actually a silent nuke IS more likely than the Goverment theory......


Go in your bathroom turn off the lights and light a small candle. Then close your eyes and repeat the above statement aloud three times,

Actually a silent nuke IS more likely than the Goverment theory......

Actually a silent nuke IS more likely than the Goverment theory......

Actually a silent nuke IS more likely than the Goverment theory......

Then open your eyes... an avatar of Azathoth will appear in the mirror. You can ask him any question, but the answer is always "it was an inside job".



posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 09:40 PM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 


Lithium batteries...fire detection systems...there are quite a few everyday items that use radioactive materials..... Again, its a case of them finding something and immeadiately declaring "Bomb" without looking for reasons why they found the items.





new topics

top topics



 
3

log in

join