posted on Dec, 17 2012 @ 07:15 AM
You know that CT, NJ, MA, CA, NY are all still under the Clinton-era AWB, right?
Seeing how many people, pundits, politicians and posters drag it out as some must-enact action Im beginning to wonder if any know what the hell they
are talking about.
We dont need to embark on some abstract metaphysical exercise here to see that an AWB will do nothing because in CT an AWB did nothing
So what do people expect a national AWB to do?
Also note the medias reluctance here to call the CT shooters "AR-15 style" rifle an assault rifle. By AWB law it wasnt an "assault rifle." To
believe that an AWB will get rid of the scary black rifles is absurd. It'll make it so they dont have bayonet lugs and their flash hiders have to be
welded on but they'll still all be evil scary looking black rifles that function just the same an any non-AWB AR-15 style rifle.
So I'm left with two explainations for this support of an AWB. The first is that these supporters are just clueless idiots who have to idea what
they're talking about but like the sound of it. Assault Weapons Ban. Yeah, that sounds nice and safe.
The second possibility is they supporters just want to take a chip off the gun rights block and they'll take any chip they can no matter how
This is an AWB compliant post-ban rifle:
This is an evil non AWB compliant rifle:
So proponents, which are you? The idiot buying into a dream or the anti-gun crusader who will take whatever they can get?