It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by bl4ke360
That's because guns aren't as accessible as knives here, as someone already said, if someone wants to kill, they will find a way of doing it.
Making guns more accessible means more people could be killed far quicker.
Originally posted by woogleuk
As for the article you linked, every country has its thugs, and those thugs generally carry weapons.
Imagine if those 20 thugs had been carrying guns, not only would the son be dead, but chances are so would the son, in fact, I would imagine a few more folk would have been caught in the crossfire.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by woogleuk
See.. what's the point in talking to you if you are incapable of understanding?
I asked how many there were in the twenty years preceding your gun bans. Even if you have less massacres, I want to know if the gun bans made them less frequent.
You are trying to get around my point and making ridiculous arguments.
I am not saying we don't have more massacres, but I am showing that guns are not the cause.
Oh, and gun ownership has stopped several massacres, so I would stick to talking about what you really know. The massacres also tend to be in places that are the least likely to have armed resistence. Movie theatre = sitting ducks, malls = preoccupied shoppers (though the clackamas shooting was arguably stopped by a concealed carry holder), schools = you get where I am going with this.
Why deny reality? Just to argue?
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
I remember singing this petition, it was popular in the media but the media at the time was responding to a public outcry, we the British public went to our politicians after these deaths and told them “get rid of the hand guns”. It worked and since then it hasn’t happened again, America could learn quite a lot form us Brits.
We still have gun crime, but the fact is that we were strong enough as a nation to make a change the sad fact is that the American public and the American government is at the mercy of the Gun lobbies and not strong enough to stand up and put an end to their dominance and stop mass shootings like this caused by legal own guns.
Originally posted by babybunnies
Americans will tell you that having more guns makes the streets safer, this is the kind of thinking that led to the massive escalation of proliferation of nuclear weapons during the cold war. The Soviet Union went broke trying to keep up with the weapons development pace of the United States.
Thank you for posting that page of the report. The stats I used from the FBI weren't about deaths, but rather any reported crime where a gun was used. It has the same recording info as the stats from the Home Office.
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by Guyfriday
Because handguns are illegal, some of those numbers will include threats with a handgun, I'm sure there will be more reports made in the UK about firearms than in the USA.
The death toll is still significantly lower (per 100,000 people) than the USA.
Here are the figures from the home office, they show gun total firearms offences to be down by over 50% from 2002/3
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by NavyDoc
We also have a lot more immigrants who carry out a lot of these murders, such as honour killings.
Originally posted by babybunnies
reply to post by NavyDoc
Not gun murders.
And the british people are actually quite happy with their gun ban.
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by Guyfriday
Because handguns are illegal, some of those numbers will include threats with a handgun, I'm sure there will be more reports made in the UK about firearms than in the USA.
The death toll is still significantly lower (per 100,000 people) than the USA.
Here are the figures from the home office, they show gun total firearms offences to be down by over 50% from 2002/3
Originally posted by woogleuk
One curious thing I have discovered in my research.......you can legally own semi-automatics in the UK with a class 1 firearms license, there is a shop in Wales for example that sells the Ruger SR-22 semi-auto........I didn't know that.
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by NavyDoc
That's (probably) because very few people who would likely commit offences with them own said rifles. Probably due to handguns being easily hidden compared with rifles. No-one wants a minimum 5 year stretch for owning illegal weapons.