Interesting article in regards to Sandy Hook and the media

Here is an interesting article which I thought ATS might enjoy reading

www.linkedin.com...

Bad things happen because of this, for example: For a few hours the wrong person was identified as the Sandy Hook killer Inaccurate details were published about how the shooter got access to the school A bogus statement that the shooter's mother worked at the school was distributed to millions
But frankly - and this will certainly seem callous - the tradeoffs are worth it. The end product is better when you have more people gathering and giving feedback on the news.

It's rather scary to think people can kill children specially when it's our gov.

Journalists have adjusted. They shifted to being part journalist, part analyst and part whistleblower. They write news. They deduce. They opine...

reply to post by rsk360


It isn't ok for them to be wrong. Truth in journalism used to mean something.

Nowadays intelligent people have to sort the wheat from the chaff and the real journalists from the damn internet bloggers. The blogger you linked to seemed to be looking for an excuse to consider himself legitimate.

Originally posted by Philospher
It's rather scary to think people can kill children specially when it's our gov.

Is it just me or is this the most inane thing seen this year.

I have no words.. again..