My local news has gone back to at least half of the news sections being about local stories, so I hadn't noticed too much that national news is still primarily focused on the shooting. My dad works at home, so he has CNN on his TV all the time during the day. Well earlier today, after dinner, we were watching the news and they mentioned a blip about how Hillary Clinton was back to work after her fall. I made a comment about how I thought it was convenient that her concussion/fall happened right before she was supposed to testify, and that other people had to go in her place. My dad looked at me with a blank/confused face. He asked me what I was talking about because he hadn't heard about it. Before I even realized it, I said "Well you wouldn't because of the shooting."

That's when it hit me that, whether intentional or not, the news of the shooting has taken the place of a lot of other things. The shooting was absolutely tragic, but its far from the only thing going on. This is why I'm so glad that I regularly check news outlets (MSM and places like ATS) to see what else is happening. I would urge everyone else to do the same, if you don't already. Even with the best intentions, the news can't cover everything, so its best to take the responsibility for this knowledge into your own hands.

How are mentally disturbed young men being identified and set up to be the patsy in domestic covert actions designed for 'problem-reaction-solution' programming of lawmakers and the general public in order to further the 'New World Order' agenda?

Early reports from Sandy Hook mentioned two or multiple shooters involved. This was reduced to one 'lone nut' as was the case in Aurora and many, many cases going all the way back to the original 'lone nut' in modern history: Lee Harvey Oswald.

Covert actions are usually set up in ways that one 'lone nut' (who fits the profile) is blamed and then it's an open and quickly shut case, case closed. This m.o. has been done successfully for years, RFK hit, MLK hit, mass shootings, John Lennon hit, you name it. As soon as lawmakers and the public are satisfied that the 'lone nut' in the media did it all by his lonesome, the secret agenda moves forward. Even in the case of 9/11, Osama bin Laden emerged quickly as the media's 'lone nut' just as Saddam Hussein had been the 'lone nut' who gave the USA 'no choice' but to invade Iraq and in so doing make the military-industrial complex and defense contractors much wealthier in the process.

I don't have any evidence that Sandy Hook was a covert op. But I do not rule it out, seeing as there is now such a big push to ban at least some types of firearms.