posted on Dec, 16 2012 @ 11:38 PM
I'd be happy if this guy was serious and would leave out the word "Social". The media coverage has been so craptastically bad on this shooting that
there is no wonder that there is a lot of misinformation out there. Yes... this guy is a total douche, his tone is rediculous and if he thinks he can
infringe on freedom of speech, he's delusional.
I do give the guy props that he has noticed that the misinformation is a problem, even if he has misdirected it at the "social media" when the real
problem lies in the media's disinformation. The left wing media is so quick to jump on the bandwagon to blame guns and forward their progressive
cause. The problem is we still don't know the truth... Was the gun used an "assault rifle" or even a rifle? I still don't know. Was the AR15 used or
was it still in the trunk. If it was left in the trunk and if the killer used only handguns... is that a good or bad thing for handgun owners? For gun
control advocates? For AR15 rifle owners?
The fact of the matter is... I don't think we are ever going to hear the real story. If you can keep the public confused... then there can't be real
debate. What they don't want to hear is real debate on mass shootings... it might come to light that every single instance of mass shootings in the
US boils down to ANTIDEPRESSANT USE!
If the argument came down to Antidepressant use... then you have politicians wondering if the public can find out if the big drug companies donated to
their campaigns. You ever wonder who donates more to the campaigns of both parties? Is it the drug companies? Is it the NRA? I suspect the former. I
hope someone out there is a little bit OCD (un-medicated of course) that will do the due diligence and report some numbers... Thanks if you do.
Below is a thread I posted that contains links to articles to support antidepressant link to mass killings
edit on 16-12-2012 by Froggy55 because: Link to my post
in another thread