It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

SANDY HOOK reference in BATMAN movie

page: 64
216
<< 61  62  63    65  66  67 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 19 2012 @ 08:51 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Dec, 19 2012 @ 08:53 PM
link   
You can add the date of the Gabriel Gifford's shooting to the list of moon cycle 'coincidences'.

Something interesting I just noticed,
www.abovetopsecret.com...&addstar=1&on=15571839#pid15571839
Towards bottom of page.

So that is Columbine, Gabrielle Gifford's, Aurora, and Sandy Hook and several of these cases are suspected mind control deals.

Edit
Checked out virginia tech and it does not match it is waning instead of waxing
lunaf.com...

So it does not work for all MK suspects. The only possible common theme would be a crescent moon but from the occult aspect waning and waxing have different meanings and attributes.

JFK assassination does seem to fit the bill as well.
edit on 19-12-2012 by FriedBabelBroccoli because: 101



posted on Dec, 19 2012 @ 09:04 PM
link   
reply to post by jennybee35
 


And I'm sorry if you think my comments were directed at you. They weren't. It's to the "adults" who have come after me personally. Sent me private messages harassing me. And why? Because I demand more than just a theory. I'm all for theories. But on this topic. With 26 innocent women and children dead. I and others expect more than a name on a map. To almost ignore the victims and accuse the families of faking with no evidence and just theories is morally wrong. Check out my thread on this. I clearly state it's worth investigating as soon as some kind of real evidence arises.



posted on Dec, 19 2012 @ 09:12 PM
link   

REMINDER....



Please stick to the topic...and discuss it...NOT each other.

No bickering.
No name calling.

We expect civility and decorum within all topics - Please Review This Link.

You are responsible for your own posts.

Failure to post civilly will have consequences.



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 02:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by elitelogic
If this is a conspiracy...how deep does it go? Who's in on it, exactly?

The Sandy Hook school staff?
The parents of children?
The medical first responders?
The local law enforcement?
The local media?

How many people would have to be involved in the above groups..(and complicit) in order to pull this off?

Or,

(In keeping with the conspiracy, programmed gunman scenario..)

Was it just the one gunman, and the above groups are left totally in the dark. (Which negates the "actor" scenario.)

Anybody have any clarifications?


Hi. May i humbly ask that you might spend a little bit of your time to skim my summary of events on page 143 of Breaking News...Sandy Hook. Just search for my user name

www.abovetopsecret.com...

The most crucial IMHO actors will be the two surviving women from the faculty meeting. One claims to have been shot thru the door into her arm and leg, and, a few days later this was added in, the other woman claimed she SAW the principal lunging after the killer.

The actors of the 6 + 1 surviving children will also be crucial. Unfortunately, Rosin will testify on the 6 on their behalf, and the Pastor, something-Solomon, will be testifying for the 1.

I've counted a need of 9-10 actors, excluding police personel, paramedics + hospital staff.

If you have time, please read my summary. I'm dying for someone to point out my holes. Thanks



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 02:47 AM
link   
reply to post by SyntheticPerception
 


I just heard many years ago that wingdings fonts are specially made to cover coded messages as in NYC (New York City) - Skull & Bones, Zionist Star, OK...



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 02:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by CinnamonHearts
reply to post by AboveBoard
 


The little boy whose funeral was on Monday was supposedly an open casket.


I read that they proceeded in accordance to Jewish traditions, entailing a simple coffin adorned with a star. That was it. Not doubting/challenging you: can you recall where it said it was an open casket? Thanks



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 02:58 AM
link   
reply to post by CinnamonHearts
 


Yes, and one SURVIVED. I read from the news that the Police theorized that the children were huddled together in Rousseau's room. Yet the lone survivor "covered in blood", who played dead, was (thank God) somehow missed. Before someone starts flaming me: i *WISH* he aimed for the head; less suffering that way. But if you have a ball of children as target with a semi-auto as weapon, wouldn't body shots be more efficient, considering he had limited time to kill as many as possible? I think the "he aimed mostly for the head" was just a convenience to make excuses for No-Viewing later.

And yes, i realize that the normal society would label me and the rest of the no-one-died theorists as sickos who need to burn in hell. I betcha if you said that to my face, i'll say, "Yeah i'm screwed up; couldn't sleep the last few days. Do YOU have the evidence that'll help me finally believe so i can sleep on the fact that they all DIED". If you wonder why i'm a sicko, it's because i just...can't accept all those children got killed like that as it is too inhuman



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 03:02 AM
link   
reply to post by newb318
 


(BUMP) Someone else said it's likely the Sandy Hook was added in post-production, so no, Chris Nolan's got nothing on this IMHO



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 03:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ladyk74
reply to post by tjmck1980
 


Don't let bikiniapple aka Mr Hollywood get to you. Me and others appreciate your input. Apparently all he can do is repeat that he worked in Holywood on sets and know some BIG names. Please...

Read the responses he gave in this thread HERE

Mostly everyone has left by now, so now he trolls in this thread.


Hey i'm still here, do i not count? >



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 03:10 AM
link   
School shooting HOAX – Here is the one piece you can show to prove it:

Sandy Hook actors and lies

and for your consideration:

Sandy Hook Exposed As A Fraud

and this:

Bad Acting From Sandy Hook




edit on 20-12-2012 by NWorderShll because: spelling mistake



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 03:31 AM
link   
reply to post by SyntheticPerception
 


I just want to point out that at this point i don't care if i'm called a scum of earth/sicko/burn in hell/etc. I've been up all night every night doing this research, trying to lay my doubts to finally rest, all because I still can't find it in my heart to believe they are actually dead. So, if i may say to EVERYONE (even you, DestinationNow, whom i miss on this thread) who think we're scum of the earth: I don't know what others will say, but if you called me that, I would gladly accept it. Happy will be the day when i just ignorantly accept the official story, and all the news stations, so i can finally get some sleep back.

But for now, we still care to expose ourselves as a sicko in asking these questions. So the way i see it, you've got only 2 choices: accept us, or reject us. We KNOW that to the average person outside of ATS, even questioning the official story (and even the media) is deviatory, so we KNOW we are deviatory. You can then either petition to kick all of us out of ATS, or accept that we're sort of not there, but are here, and know that telling us to burn in hell/are mentally unstable/etc. is counterproductive to say the least. Silence is the best solution. Search the threads yourselves, i know i have: we haven't been attacking you. I have 't been attacking you; i know how to use silence. But you have been attacking us. Obviously, you could be shills, whereas if we were shills, we're probably non-profit
. So please, can the name-callings stop? It's really only you guys who are still doing it.

Now, back to topic: (BUMP) as another already suggested, the words Sandy Hook could be added in post-production, so i don't think Chris Nolan (or his brother's dealings) is of great importance.



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 03:45 AM
link   
So we have an Aurora reference and a Sandy Hook reference inside the movie that had a mass shooting of its own. Movies called Dark Knight Rises. It's an investigative movie, the line "never believe in coincidences" is in there twice. I'm not jumping to conclusions, but I admit it sounds like a bad movie.



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 03:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by klebics
reply to post by SyntheticPerception
 


I just want to point out that at this point i don't care if i'm called a scum of earth/sicko/burn in hell/etc. I've been up all night every night doing this research, trying to lay my doubts to finally rest, all because I still can't find it in my heart to believe they are actually dead. So, if i may say to EVERYONE (even you, DestinationNow, whom i miss on this thread) who think we're scum of the earth: I don't know what others will say, but if you called me that, I would gladly accept it. Happy will be the day when i just ignorantly accept the official story, and all the news stations, so i can finally get some sleep back.

But for now, we still care to expose ourselves as a sicko in asking these questions. So the way i see it, you've got only 2 choices: accept us, or reject us. We KNOW that to the average person outside of ATS, even questioning the official story (and even the media) is deviatory, so we KNOW we are deviatory. You can then either petition to kick all of us out of ATS, or accept that we're sort of not there, but are here, and know that telling us to burn in hell/are mentally unstable/etc. is counterproductive to say the least. Silence is the best solution. Search the threads yourselves, i know i have: we haven't been attacking you. I have 't been attacking you; i know how to use silence. But you have been attacking us. Obviously, you could be shills, whereas if we were shills, we're probably non-profit
. So please, can the name-callings stop? It's really only you guys who are still doing it.

Now, back to topic: (BUMP) as another already suggested, the words Sandy Hook could be added in post-production, so i don't think Chris Nolan (or his brother's dealings) is of great importance.


Im with you. But I could list 2 or 3 references of personal attacks from ct'ers on this thread alone. So your side as you put it, is far from innocent.



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 04:24 AM
link   
reply to post by klebics
 





I don't know what others will say,


lay off the 'us' stuff. im no sicko. thats what i would say.



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 04:43 AM
link   
reply to post by buckrogerstime
 


FAIL. It's a different movie. One stars Dougray Scott from 2008 and the other a low-low-low budget flick from 2001.

RESEARCH FAIL!!!!



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 04:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by NWorderShll
School shooting HOAX – Here is the one piece you can show to prove it:

Sandy Hook actors and lies

and for your consideration:

Sandy Hook Exposed As A Fraud

and this:

Bad Acting From Sandy Hook




edit on 20-12-2012 by NWorderShll because: spelling mistake


LOL!!! Tony Hawk playing Robbie Parker?

NUTJOB



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 05:27 AM
link   
Here's something I've been wondering, does anybody else notice that most of the threads discussing the Sandy Hook shooting are full of members that have just joined very recently? These people I'm talking about also have a completely blank mini-profile, nothing filled out, no avatar, bupkis.

Is anyone else thinking what I'm thinking?
edit on 20-12-2012 by Xaphan because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 06:12 AM
link   
reply to post by klebics
 


Two boys were buried on Monday. Jack Pinto is the one I was referring to in my post.

"Jack wore a red-and-white jersey with receiver Victor Cruz's number 80 as he lay in an open white casket at the service. During Sunday's game, Cruz wore shoes with "R.I.P. Jack Pinto" written on the side."

Here's the source:

news.msn.com...



posted on Dec, 20 2012 @ 06:19 AM
link   
reply to post by klebics
 


The fact that there were so few injuries was odd to me. When Wolf Blitzer brought that up to Vance, he had no idea how to respond. He was a babbling mess. It's at the end of this video. Also strange to me is that it appears they hadn't interviewed Adam's father yet which is also in this video.

My best advice is to ignore anyone who attempts to engage you in personal attacks, they usually have an ulterior motive.

www.youtube.com...
edit on 20-12-2012 by CinnamonHearts because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
216
<< 61  62  63    65  66  67 >>

log in

join