Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Is the Moon a Mothership ?

page: 24
58
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Then you refuse to open it, regardless of what I say. That is where we end.




posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:18 PM
link   
reply to post by FreedomCommander
 

I asked you to explain it. You can't.
The end, indeed.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by FreedomCommander
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 


Brown? That guy, Cater, mentions him.

Took his work and broke it down, found that Electrons are more likely to be attracted to Protons than vice versa.


There you go. Keep it simple.
You should go build a prototype in your garage and stop throwing gibberish at Phage.
When it works post it on YouTube.

Merry Christmas!



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:20 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:20 PM
link   
reply to post by FreedomCommander
 

Don't worry about me.
I'll be fine.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:21 PM
link   
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 



You should go build a prototype in your garage and stop throwing gibberish at Phage.
When it works post it on YouTube.

Link to your vid? You have built a prototype, right?



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:23 PM
link   
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 


Thanks sir. At least your trying to diffuse the situation here, and you have my thanks.

But let me in you on little something here that I've found. This is what I face everyday with people like that, the war of "Othodox Vs. Unorthodox"

It's just hard to find explorers out here than scientists.

Merry Christmas to you.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by FreedomCommander
 


***SNIP*** No big deal.
I think you picked the wrong German.

Albert Einstein did some great work for us at Princeton, NJ.
It was called the Philadelphia Experiment.
They started with a toy boat and then just scaled it up to a full size U.S. Navy
destroyer.
edit on 12/22/2012 by Blaine91555 because: Snipped off topic comment about another member.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 



You should go build a prototype in your garage and stop throwing gibberish at Phage.
When it works post it on YouTube.

Link to your vid? You have built a prototype, right?


No, not yet. I'll explain later.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:31 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:33 PM
link   
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 


The Philadelphia Experiment?

He mentions that as well. The results are that the ship was gone but in turn it teleported to another port. But they didn't do it on a toy boat the first time, that's the problem, they did it with a destroyer-class warship.

The basic principle was that by employing two UV generators they are able to be of the UV frequency, in other words, invisible. But little did they know that when in that state, thought is important, due to interia-less state. So far that I got out of it, the generators have to be on the ship. From perspective, they must weigh a lot.

Einstein wasn't part of it, let alone, he wasn't in the picture of that time.

I think they stumbled on the tech, and it opened just another way for cloaking tech.
edit on 22-12-2012 by FreedomCommander because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:35 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:37 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Like I said, let's not do that again. ok?



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:40 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by FreedomCommander
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 


The Philadelphia Experiment?

He mentions that as well. The results are that the ship was gone but in turn it teleported to another port. But they didn't do it on a toy boat the first time, that's the problem, they did it with a destroyer-class warship.

The basic principle was that by employing two UV generators they are able to be of the UV frequency, in other words, invisible. But little did they know that when in that state, thought is important, due to interia-less state. So far that I got out of it, the generators have to be on the ship. From perspective, they must weigh a lot.

Einstein wasn't part of it, let alone, he wasn't in the picture of that time.

I think they stumbled on the tech, and it opened just another way for cloaking tech.
edit on 22-12-2012 by FreedomCommander because: (no reason given)


They successfully warped spacetime.
Then they suppressed all knowledge of the experiment and just used the convoy system
instead. We won WWII without using the advanced technology.

We became a post warp society. The U.S. Navy denies anything ever happened.
They are right to do so.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:46 PM
link   
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 



Just choose another thread. You proved your point here

FWIW, I'd prefer that he remain here countering the fountains of ignorance that are flowing. Sorry if I find him helpful.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:49 PM
link   
Please keep the conversation on the topic and off each other. The topic here is NOT your opinions of each other and that needs to stop.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 


His prior questions are valid. Until they are answered, he is just wasting his time
on this thread. He is needed elsewhere.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 02:54 PM
link   
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 




They successfully warped spacetime.
Then they suppressed all knowledge of the experiment and just used the convoy system
instead. We won WWII without using the advanced technology.

We became a post warp society. The U.S. Navy denies anything ever happened.
They are right to do so.


I'm a skeptic on the whole space-time ordeal, but if that is one way of putting it in your terms, then yes that is what happened.

Although, I like to keep it simple. Just saying, one thought can make you go anywhere, hence the name "Omnipresent"

U.S.A. has their own reasons for denial, but it must be out of fear. Not because of what people can do with it, it's because of what vested interests are willing to do if it gets out of hand, in such, killing all who are connected to it and kill anyone that they are connected to. That's harsh.





new topics

top topics



 
58
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join