Nobody at school has ever heard of Nancy Lanza - SHE NEVER WORKED THERE, page 8


Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 87 times


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 05:20 PM by HeyAHuman
Remember the Batman shooter, way back in July? There has been a lot of witness testimony from inmates and guards that he had been in a sort of inebriated state, spouting gibberish and drooling on himself, unable to coherently communicate. The district attorney on the case refused to use the information in court, and the recurring theme seems to be that the offender is "too whacked" to give testimony of his motives... They are either isolated cooks, put into quiet captivity so that the arbitrary data used by the media can decide the public's perception, or... They are killed by the police, or commit suicide.

There are theories that the Batman shooter was under MK Ultra experimentation, and was a pawn who was manipulated, implemented into a psyop agenda, and tossed in a cage, a deranged vessel used for a greater, heinous cause. A political agenda. Knowing what I've read about MK Ultra, the larium, the experiments... This theory makes more sense to me than the literal THEORY that he was just an angry kid who played too many video games and snapped unexpectedly. All motives are merely theories... Surely it would be nice (and logical) if there was a shred of effort put into getting into this young man's mind by interrogation and making it publicly accessible, right?

As for the Connecticut shooter.... It's only a matter of time before the theories start piling on, and the circumstances, in several ways, seem similar. The mother could have been wrongly labeled a teacher to give a convenient motive for the shooter to attack the school. And of course the media is already latching onto the oh-so-easy "mental illness" plug. Asperger's? Right. Because that disease is known for creating such terrifyingly tragic events. In other words: "if only he had taken strong meds, and if only guns were illegal."

We shall see.
edit on 16-12-2012 by HeyAHuman because: typos



reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 05:29 PM by mahatche
Originally posted by BellaSabre
reply to
post by Komaratzi11



Yes, why did she own so many guns? This is what bothers me. The "gun aficionado" story is hard to swallow.

What was she afraid of? Domestic Violence? Her ex-husband? Her son?

Even so, a simple handgun would protect against that.

Also, does anybody know if he went out and bought all that ammo, or did she already have it in the home?

If she did, she was as crazy as he is -- was.
edit on 12/16/2012 by BellaSabre because: (no reason given)


Who says you have to be afraid of something to own a lot of guns? some are just collectors. for a gun collector 4-5 guns wouldn't necessarily be a lot.


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 05:44 PM by hangedman13
reply to post by bekod



Here we go with those odd gun counts.
He then took one of her handguns and two powerful rifles she owned to the nearby Sandy Hook Elementary School and killed 20 students, six adults and, finally, himself.
NY POST Now in the NY daily news they show a picture w/ two hand guns and one rifle.NY Daily News Scroll down half the page and it's there. And in that Daily news piece they mention she worked at the school.

Nancy Lanza, 54, whom Adam murdered inside the home the two shared, reportedly had worked at Sandy Hook Elementary School. But more recently, she was taking care of her son. Read more: www.nydailynews.com...
Are we dealing with a inept media or something else? Who is okaying the print of this info if it is not factual?


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 05:51 PM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by bekod



The guns weren't legal.. they were stolen by her son (and carried and possessed illegally if he was under 21).
They were legally owned by her, but became illegal when they were stolen. I mean.. I doubt she loaned them to him, nawmsayin'?


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 06:07 PM by Jeremiah65
reply to post by texasgirl



That's a good point. I can see that.

I also am curious about the 3 women that were killed at the school that do not show up on the faculty registry. What was their job? Whose kids were the in contact with? Why are the NOT on the registry? It's 3 months into the school year, even the clerk and typists had email accounts...why not these women? Just questions...


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 06:12 PM by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by research100



Fair enough.

Now journalism MUST reform itself so that a single lead does not equal "breaking news." Two or more sources, or no story.

True journalism holds a special / protected status in terms of free-speech because it is NOT marketing. Not just because it calls itself "journalism."


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 06:22 PM by waltdisney
Originally posted by BABYBULL24
'News reports Friday suggested that Nancy Lanza had worked at the elementary school, but at a news conference on Saturday, the school superintendent said there was no evidence that she had ever worked at the school as a full-time or substitute teacher, or in any other capacity.'

Denver Post


This has False Flag written all over it. Look how they are trying to detach themselves from this "Nancy Lanza" person already. More proof that she probably doesn't even exist, let alone her crazy gunman son.

CNN
The chilling sound of multiple gunshots shattered the relative quiet of the school day at Sandy Hook Elementary School at around 9:30 Friday morning -- children screaming, then silence, as teachers did their best to protect their students and keep them quiet, hoping desperately the shooter would not find them.



Multiple gun shots? How do you kill 27 people with multiple gunshots? Sounds like some terror drill they performed with blank ammunition, to trick kids into talking on camera. Insert crying Obama & you got a whole country donating to Red Cross.

The Red Cross has also been on the ground, offering food and water to first responders, and providing more than 50 units of blood to Danbury hospital where some of the victims were transported. They have set up a center for emergency grief counseling.




reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 06:45 PM by MagicWand67
Originally posted by fluff007


I dont know if this is any help, but its something that seems to be floating round social media at the moment...

gawker.com...


The woman who wrote that article was not actually Adam Lanza's Mother.

It was a figure of speech. She was comparing her own son to these killers.


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 07:08 PM by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow




The guns weren't legal.. they were stolen by her son (and carried and possessed illegally if he was under 21).
They were legally owned by her, but became illegal when they were stolen. I mean.. I doubt she loaned them to him, nawmsayin'?


this was the point of this psy ops, to show the sheeple, look even if a person doesnt get it legal, they could STEAL someone elses gun!!! NO ONE IS SAFE!!!!!!

thats why we should ban them (just what the U.N wants)

the last psy ops was to show, look you can buy all this armor and guns and tear gas? online with a credit card.

before that, racist people use guns,

the one before that was to show how guns can work on group mentality so dont join a militia

before that it was , look even high school kids can get these dangerous weapons,

how about waco, SHOWS EVEN IN A GROUP WITH GUNS THE ATF WILL BURN YOU ALIVE WITH YOUR KIDS!!!
the one before that
and before that
and before that.

long list of psyops/ i mean really, if you are going to go through all the trouble of killing people, setting up for it, planning it, all for what . to shoot yourself at the end of it all? no look ma im on top of the world. no rhyme or reason just for chits and giggles? and just guns. im not really inclined towards making weapons or bombs, but so many simple things can be made that do huge damage, and all they bring is guns? why the hell wear body armor if you know you are going to shoot self at end? lol really people, maybe one or two, but start counting how many cases the "shooter" shot themselves and you have to wonder

a did they shoot the shooter and cover it up.

b or are all these complete BS government psyops to help them change policy.

in any event we are one of the last to still have real weapons, when we go down, thats it , the trains will be warming up, you can bet on that. im pretty sure they are waiting on this domino. and these violent gun shootings will continue until they can bend the peoples will. if they can wipe 3500 people off the face of the planet to make some money short selling airlines, can you imagine what they will come up with to get you to WANT to give up the guns?


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 07:34 PM by BABYBULL24
edit on 16-12-2012 by BABYBULL24 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags