It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by merkins
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
I think the world would be a much safer place if we banned psychopathy.
We'd be free of the NWO and the elites in no time.
As a brit i'm probably in a minority but the more guns in the hands of the public the better.
We cant uninvent them so we must use them to prevent and stop crime.
I wonder how many lives would have been saved if all the teachers and
staff had been openly carrying.
Originally posted by RainbeauBleu
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
Maybe it would be more accurate to ban meds. Almost every shooter has been on psych meds since Columbine....or suffering withdrawal symptoms. Since the DMV has classified every human emotion as a medical problem treatable by prescription meds.....no one can have guns and must be medicated. LOL. Welcome to 1984. You're a bit out of the park on this post, OP. I think you have a mental illness and that you should be medicated immediately. Sodium Fluoride and Thorazine...
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
More often than not the perpetrator of acts of violence is sick in the head.
The knife attacks in China yesterday were committed by a schizophrenic. The shooter in CT yesterday was allegedly schizophrenic and on meds as were the Aurora theater, Loughner, Cho, and virtually all the others.
The streets are littered with schizophrenics and the mentally ill who self medicate and commit scores of petty crimes every minute of everyday and occasionally murder each other and innocent bystanders out of fits of rage or during robbery attempts.
It's irrational to focus so much attention on the skewed peaks and spikes such as yesterdays event in CT if the goal is to make the world an all around safer place. It's also irrational to place blame on an inanimate object such as a knife, car or a gun.
But here we have a common denominator for a huge percentage of crime across the board and they are much easier to keep tabs on than say hundreds of millions of inanimate objects. They're are fewer mental patients than there are guns. They often end up in the system simply by virtue of their illness. Occasionally they even come forward seeking professional help.
The way I figure it if people are truly serious about making the world a safer place they should be focusing on their efforts on not just the most common perpetrator but also a variable that is relatively easier to track, regulate and control than any other.
So why do we waste so much time and money chasing phantoms that we cant really do anything about instead of working with something we can actually do something about?
Originally posted by Dispo
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
"Hey, that guy is #ting in the corner, I SHOULD ALSO BE ALLOWED TO # IN THE CORNER BECAUSE I ALSO ENJOY #TING IN CORNERS."
As for your analogy to gun control, guns are as you said, inanimate objects. Mentally ill people are people. See the difference?
If you see a misinformed debate taking place, join it and bring information to the table. Educate people. That is your responsibility as a human being.
What you shouldn't do is make a troll thread expressing a controversial opinion, string people along and then say "LOL GUYS SEE IT WAS A RIDICULOUSLY TENUOUS ANALOGY THAT ONLY MAKES SENSE IN MY HEAD BTW JOKE'S ON YOU I WAS ONLY PRETENDING TO BE STUPID."
What can we do? When we closed insane asylums that was great but the solution is not to let sick people wander the streets and be a health hazard to everyone else. I know some people who imagine building more jails is the answer - it isn't, neither is banning psychotherapy.
I think the world would be a much safer place if we banned psychopathy.