posted on Dec, 15 2012 @ 01:11 AM
As a frog placed in cool water heated to a boil never realizes that he is in danger, do we as well with the events over the last 10 – 15 years. I
don’t believe it that it has actively been older than the Clinton years in this iteration. Now we all know that the powers at be have had designs
on the world for a very long time, but I think it is most obvious in the last 15 years. Taken individually, the events do not have an obvious link to
each other, but if we start tying them in with a larger view, I hope it will paint an interesting canvass.
Let us start with the first ‘Big’ item on the list, we could go back and discuss de-regulation but why? 9/11, whatever your own personal theory
is, let us just say ‘it was a setup’ for whatever reason you might have. 9/11 allowed the government to pull all sides together in one moment and
start in-acting some pretty extreme concepts that normally would have been spawned an outrage. However, the ‘party line’ was simply homeland
defense, and anyone that spoke up against it was demonized as non-patriotic. We remember the McCarthy style tactics used during that period. The
majority of the population bought into the flag waving and fell in line with whatever they gave us as ‘increased security’ regardless of what it
eroded. This action equals ‘Loss of Freedom’
This initiated the stock market crash, one so severe it’s like hasn’t been seen in over 70 years. Now this wouldn’t have been such a
devastating event to the normal individual except that unlike 20 years previous, the average employee didn’t have a ‘pension’ they had a 401k or
investment plan tied to the stock market. We remember this too, so many people lost their life’s saving, the nest egg they had stashed for away for
old age. This destroyed what private safety net the average person had, if they had any. Who gained from that, only the few and rich gained off that
crash, but I’m not going into those details. ‘Loss of Retirement’
Next came a housing bubble, the value of homes skyrocketed. The average consumer purchased a home at extremely inflated prices. This was ‘good’
initially as people thought they had ‘true’ value, they had a piece of property that was ‘worth’ something. Then the housing bubble popped
and now these homes are worthless, absolutely rock bottom prices. The problem was, the owner still had a mortgage at the original rate. This caused
a scenario when people started to evaluate what they were paying in against what they were paying for. Now combine that with the big banks using
improper foreclosure procedures, and no real need to go into detail as we all remember how the stories that came out from that. However, after the
stock crash and before the housing market popped, people said, ‘well honey, we lost our savings, BUT we have a $300,000 house that we can sell when
we retire and buy something cheaper and live off the difference’. That was their secondary private safety net. However, now they not only have
little value in their home, most actually lost those homes only to be bought up in mass by rich private investors for a song and a dime to be rented
back out to those that had previously owned a home. This equates to now instead of putting money into home ownerships, the individual now just rents
time in a property. ‘Loss of Land’
Throughout the last decade, fuel prices have gone through the roof due to ‘insanely flimsy’ reasons. We all have looked at some of the excuses
and scratched our heads in confusion at the idiocy that they expect us to buy those reasons….Yet we Do. The average individual does not realize
that the fuel we purchase now was bought six months to a year previous, and anything that happens now won’t actually effect consumption value for
another six months to a year. This causes the average individual to spend more of their paycheck on just getting back and forth to work or anywhere
else for that matter. This equates to a ‘Loss of Cash’.
Healthcare, this is a heated topic on both sides and we won’t go into that debate, but will address what it means. This has a number of effects on
the average individual. First, the average individual now has to buy in, where previously it was a choice. I personally didn’t have health care
for years as a small business owner because I couldn’t afford it. Now that paycheck you have, a portion of it has to go to healthcare whether you
like it or not. This equates to a ‘Loss of Cash’ Second effect, now employers are starting to use this as an excuse to cut hours of regular
employees from 35-40 hrs per week to whatever is the barely under the minimum for required healthcare provisions. They won’t suffer as they will
just hire two people at half time instead of one full time. The work will be done regardless, they will not feel a thing. This equates to a “Loss
of Cash”.
With the current flow of employment, unlike 30 years ago when someone took a job based on the ‘perks’, we do not even question perks, we literally
ask if the checks will clear and take it on the chin. 9 to 5 used to be the norm, that was an 8 hour shift with paid lunch and breaks. Now, it is an
8 hour shift with non-paid lunches, which means more time at the office. Not a huge deal, but one more nail in the coffin as we have turned the
culture to an Employer gets what an Employer wants, and an Employee is ‘Lucky’ to have a job.
To this point, we have lost Freedoms, Retirement, Property, Cash, Cash, and Cash. Over the last decade at the least, it has been a subtle picking at
the average individual that paints a much greater picture of what the powers at be intend.
Finally, the last point that raises the real concerns. America is the last bastion of an individual’s right to carry arms with the intent to defend
civil liberties against an overbearing government. In the last year, there have been numerous mass shooting scenarios, and yes, many have been
discussed here at length with regards to the individual act being a possible false flag. With the most recent one, let us assume Aurora was an inside
job. It didn’t gather the fervor that the powers wanted. It just didn’t gain the solidarity toward gun control that 9/11 gained towards homeland
security. So they ramped up the game, they aimed at something that would without question gather support. They aimed at children, and not just any
children, but very young children in a small community where violence was not likely. Why? First, anyone speaks out against any action to address
what happens, these children’s’ faces are thrown up, ‘what, you want this to happen to your child?’ or ‘tell this parent that you are
against this.’ Exactly identical to the aftermath of 9/11. Next, even the hardline gun advocates are now screaming for something to be done.
Finally, a small community includes everyone, if this happened in Detroit, ‘oh well, that is a rough city, that would never happen here.’ I heard
a report today that the last violent crime in that town happened in 2010. Over two years ago. This tells everyone that every community is vulnerable
and no one is safe.