It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OOOOOO
"Gun Crime Soars in England Where Guns Are Banned"
link townhall.com...
Now don't bitch at me this is quote from link, if you want to bitch, bitch at link.edit on 15-12-2012 by OOOOOO because: ,
Figures showed the number of crimes involving handguns had more than doubled since the post-Dunblane massacre ban on the weapons, from 2,636 in 1997-1998 to 5,871.
Unadjusted figures showed overall recorded crime in the 12 months to last September rose 9.3%
....
Shadow home secretary Oliver Letwin said: "These figures are truly terrible.
"Despite the street crime initiative, robbery is massively up. So are gun-related crimes, domestic burglary, retail burglary, and drug offenses.
"The only word for this is failure: the Government's response of knee-jerk reactions, gimmicks and initiatives is not working and confused signals on sentences for burglary will not help either.
.......
At least some in the UK are talking about "attacking crime at its roots" by focusing on criminals, after all, guns are already banned so they can't blame crime on guns shooting themselves. Meanwhile in the United States, as more and more people own guns, the rate of violent crime has gone down.
Violent crime in the United States fell for the fifth consecutive year in 2011 with murder, rape and robbery all going down, although crime remains a serious problem in many urban areas, the FBI said on Monday.
The report of all crimes reported to police nationwide showed slightly more than 1.2 million violent incidents nationwide, while property crimes hit a nine-year low.
Compared with 2010, the new figures show violent crime down 3.8 percent overall. Property crime was down 0.5 percent.
Among violent incidents reported to police, murders were down about 0.7 percent, robberies dropped 4 percent, aggravated assaults declined 3.9 percent, and forcible rapes were down 2.5 percent.
On top of these figures, the notoriously violent city of Washington D.C. just saw its murder rate fall below triple digits for the first time since 1963 and just four years after the Supreme Court overturned the city's handgun ban in District of Columbia v. Heller.
Originally posted by Helmkat
Why do gun advocates want to make the conversation about anything other than guns?
Instead of guns, lets talk about automobiles.
Instead of guns, lets talk about knives.
Instead of guns, lets talk about video games.
Instead of guns, lets talk about society.
Instead of guns, lets talk about politics.
Instead of guns, lets talk about Human nature.
I am not anti-gun, I've served in our armed forces. I've been prepared to use guns in self defense and in the defense of others. That being said we need to get a handle on the gun violence in America and that conversation cannot take place if we can't even talk about the role these weapons play in the problem and be willing to say "Yes, they are -part- of the problem."edit on 15-12-2012 by Helmkat because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DYepes
Attention Europeans: you have absolutley no place to speak about the alleged "Broken American Society"
Every year communities in some country in the EU break out into riots causing may carnage and death. And we are not talking about the cesspools like Romania or Bulgaria, or even Greece. It happens in Britain, Spain and France as well and most recently in the Netherlands. We have all seen it on the global news. Youths enraged at the status quo of their European host nation. It would seem to me most of Europe on the community level is in more # than the majority of America.
We Americans understand your all just jealous that half your countries are still run under Monarchy. And to believe those Kings and Queens, Dukes and Lords have are merely for show is as ignorant as telling us we have problems with guns.
The FBI statistics alone show that murders and gun crimes are down year after year for about two decades now, while gun ownership is reaching unprecedant levels. Even accidental gun deaths go down year after year.
You should be blaming the legally prescribed medications of one variation or another that almost every maniac shooter is usually under. It isnt any particular med, just the fact that most of these shooters are under some form of medication. Would it not reasonably make sense that things than can change the chemical balances in someones head and cause them to snap?
Before we continue to blame guns for crime, even though FBI statistics show violent crimes involving firearms is continually on decline with record increased gun ownership, perhaps we should continue to find out what happens when an entire population is cutoff from even the most basic and supposedly benign legal prescription drugs. See how violent the people will actually get.
My sons elementry school has two armed gaurds on campus at all times, and I am not in a high crime city or a high crime neighborhood. We must allow, no we must MANDATE that all schools, hospitals, and place of public gathering be patrolled by armed gaurds, and permit concealed carry at any and all functions outside of a courthouse or airport terminals of course.edit on 12/15/2012 by DYepes because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DYepes
IF tomorrow guns are banned from legal ownership in the United States, the rate of violent crimes will skyrocket. BECAUSE CRIMINALS DO NOT FOLLOW THE LAWedit on 12/15/2012 by DYepes because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DYepes
I would also like to report that at least three urabn cities with the highest murder and violent crime rates, such as Los Angelos, New York City, and Chicago have some of the strictes gun control laws in the country, with outright bans being also a factor. I would like an explanation as how this is possible, when the logic from "I heart gun control" is less guns equals less crime?
Originally posted by DYepes
I would also like to report that at least three urabn cities with the highest murder and violent crime rates, such as Los Angelos, New York City, and Chicago have some of the strictes gun control laws in the country, with outright bans being also a factor. I would like an explanation as how this is possible, when the logic from "I heart gun control" is less guns equals less crime?
Originally posted by steve1709
Originally posted by DYepes
I would also like to report that at least three urabn cities with the highest murder and violent crime rates, such as Los Angelos, New York City, and Chicago have some of the strictes gun control laws in the country, with outright bans being also a factor. I would like an explanation as how this is possible, when the logic from "I heart gun control" is less guns equals less crime?
How does go to the next city/state, get a gun, bring it home. If anyone was serious about it, then the WHOLE country would have to do it ALL AT ONCE without the stupid situation of fed laws saying one thing and state laws say something else ( like mary jane laws). But it won't happen. People are scared. so they won't give up their security blankets just like a post just above this one. Proof positive that many people can see the system is broke, but there's no trust in govt to fi it.
The thing is that there's many many positive steps that could be taken immediately
Requirements for registering and detailing any transfer of weapons
Mandatory investigations with sporadic large ammo purchases
Findings of liability for insufficiently secured firearms
Mandatory checks of property, security, training before purchase
There's lots and lots of potentials, you don't need to outright ban guns immediately. The US has so many guns that it will take 2-3 decades to remotely bring down the number to reasonable levels.
Originally posted by MagicWand67
I can agree with all of those as being reasonable and responsible safety measures.
But none of those will prevent these kinds of tragedies.
How do you know? If his mother had secured her firearms properly perhaps he wouldn't have had access to them. If she had been reviewed prior to purchasing them perhaps her son's odd behaviour would have been noticed. If an ongoing assessment had to be made, perhaps psychological reports might have surfaced.
Yes, hind-sight is 20/20, but you seem to be saying that nothing could have prevented this, which is faulty thinking.
Strong gun regulation is essential to a civilised society
Originally posted by MagicWand67
reply to post by exponent
Don't play dumb. That's just ignorant to believe.
OK, suppose the mother kept her guns locked up.
He stabs his mother to death and takes her keys.
Answer this below
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by exponent
yah or at least a society whose spirit of freedom and liberty is already broken and which has more surveillance cameras per capita than anywhere else. All in how you look at it I guess.edit on 15-12-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by esdad71
reply to post by exponent
I would guess the violence in England ended with the IRA I would think...ended officially around 97 or so... There is your violence slide along with the gun ban but now it is Muslims there. I would arm myself without question.
Is this a problem? Please explain this to me. My children cannot fire any weapon in my house nor do they know where they are. My wife does not know where some are. But they are all in safes and locked. Costs as little as 8 bucks or go to a local police station and I am sure they have a program to give you a free one. If someone was to try to enter my home, from my bed, it would take me less than 15 seconds to unlock the safe/load and call 911.
Now, a killer, if they cannot find something, will try and try or use something else. In this recent case, he was trusted with accessibility to the weapons. That was a poor choice of the registered gun owner but did it alone cause the death of these people. No. It was also the evil that was trapped within this person to commit such an act. If it was not with gun it would be something else eventually. I would almost bet anything he had killed a cat or a few squirrels to feel the spark he could control at some point. This is evil...Or maybe he thought he was Darth Vader...I mean, that where he killed all the little Jedi was a little disturbing, no? Who knows...
I think we should try to celebrate hte life of some of the heroes in the stories coming out from the school.