Curiosity and Fossils of Mars, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 15-12-2012 @ 11:09 AM by 0pass
Originally posted by ArMaP
Originally posted by 0pass
Have you held coal in your hands?

Yes, and I have found several fossils some 200 metres from where I live. I still have some.

Just hold coal in your hands and you are holding a fossil.
Coal - Fossil fuel

Jokes apart, do I need to have actually seen a fossil what with the internet and three dimentional imagery available.

And am I been given a sample of martian rock to know what a fossil looks like. I am just looking at images posted by NASA.

And to my layman eyes, these look like fossils of some sort. Whether they are actually fossils or just rock it is for experts to decide and NASA seems to have also spotted one of these rocks and did a laser test.

Once the results are out and they turn out to be rocks, then I rest my case.

edit on 15-12-2012 by 0pass because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-12-2012 @ 11:30 AM by ArMaP
Originally posted by 0pass
Now this is how a real fossil would look (with some color correction maybe) on Mars.


Some things about that photo:
- colourising a photo removes some information about the image, as you turn it into a monochrome image
- images that size will always be hard to analyse
- we don't really know how a Martian fossil looks like

But yes, generally it would be something like that.

But for most of us this would still look like rocks. Unless the rock is excavated and analyzed, it will remain a rock no matter how closely it looks like a dinosaur.

It depends, after all, we only pick the rocks that look unusual, we don't pick all the rocks when we are looking for fossils.

Unless we have an army of paleontologists on Mars, we have no option but to depend on the expert opinion of NASA scientists (who I believe are not paleontologist of any measure) and the findings of their tests and instruments which sometimes is called one for the "History Books" and then repudiated a few days later.

I don't think they have palaeontologists on the Curiosity team, but a geologist is enough to "filter" some of the cases. After all, a fossil can only be part of a sedimentary rock or be a mineralized version of the original, fossils do not exist in igneous rocks like basalt, for example.

Another example of a fossil found on our planet earth which too look like a bunch of rocks except for people with "pareidolia"


Context is important. If I saw something like this on a Mars photo I would probably say that they look like rocks but that they would look out of place in an area like all those we have seen so far, without rocks that look like that.

After all, fossils are rocks.



reply posted on 15-12-2012 @ 05:35 PM by Kratos40
reply to post by 0pass



You are a troll. Period!! What I saw here was clear evidence of wind erosion. If there were any water erosion, it happened billions of years ago. Go back to watching the movie Dune, because you are ridiculous.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hubble\'s Hidden Treasures - Incredible views of the Universe
  Posted 17 days ago with 40 member flags
Mars curiosity Sol2 Anomalies
  Posted 11 days ago with 22 member flags
Curiosity Just Went Through Mud?
  Posted 0 days ago with 22 member flags
Mars: Fears Curiosity Will Contaminate Planet
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags
Milky Way in detail.
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Went to the moon, we never went, was scared off, still going!?
  Posted 15 days ago with 11 member flags