GravityLight: the low-cost lamp powered by sand and gravity, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times
Topic started on 14-12-2012 @ 11:01 AM by Merriman Weir
I've not seen this on ATS, so I thought I'd post it.

Two London designers have developed a gravity-powered lamp that could sell for as little as £3, bringing light to remote regions in developing countries

The problem of bringing light to remote parts of the developing world has been tackled in the past with everything from solar-powered lamps to wind-up devices and rechargeable batteries – all of which require relatively expensive kit or physical effort by the user.

But two London-based designers have now developed a light source that operates on the stuff that surrounds you – earth, rocks or sand – with the helping hand of gravity.

Developed by Martin Riddiford and Jim Reeves over the last four years, the GravityLight is simply charged by a bag that is filled with around 9kg of material and hung from a cord below the light. As the bag descends, a series of gears inside the device translates this weight into energy, providing 30 minutes of light. The light strength can be adjusted, from strong task lighting to a longer-lasting low-level glow, and two terminals on the front allow it to be used as a generator so it can recharge other devices including radios and batteries.


GravityLight: the low-cost lamp powered by sand and gravity

I'm not connected with the team that have built this prototype and I've no commercial interest. I just thought it was a nice piece of design & engineering.

The applications for this look really good and could provide answers that regular 'eco lamps' never really could and also eliminate a lot of the problems that come from low-cost lighting solutions like kerosene.

To make this a more ATS-friendly story, I can imagine it having lots of uses in a SHTF scenario, and charging your iPhone, and not just helping the 3rd world &c.


reply posted on 14-12-2012 @ 04:35 PM by nerbot
reply to post by Merriman Weir



Great idea, but....as usual, someone thinks it needs to be modern looking, high tech and made of plastic.

I was initially impressed when I read the story but disillusioned when I clicked the link.

We live in a world of surplus and waste, and people think we need more?

Great idea, lousy concept to bring to the market.

Profit, recognition, and ultimately it won't catch on because those who understand and need these ideas will make their own from scrap. Yay!


reply posted on 15-12-2012 @ 04:04 AM by Merriman Weir
Originally posted by nerbot
reply to
post by Merriman Weir



Great idea, but....as usual, someone thinks it needs to be modern looking, high tech and made of plastic.

I was initially impressed when I read the story but disillusioned when I clicked the link.

We live in a world of surplus and waste, and people think we need more?

Great idea, lousy concept to bring to the market.

Profit, recognition, and ultimately it won't catch on because those who understand and need these ideas will make their own from scrap. Yay!


If they do make their own from scrap, then good on them. A paradigm shift in this kind of device will inevitably produce a whole wake of copycat products whether amateur or professional.

However, I'm not sure that the execution of the idea is particularly bad, and I don't think it's overly-designed. It being plastic is a fairly realistic design solution as it's likely to be cheaper, light-weight and wipeable/hygienic and to an an extent more waterproof than other materials.

It's basic functions are the light, a control switch and the two terminals for charging other devices. It doesn't lend itself to that many design solutions. What's to be gained from creating a box shape? Other than potentially wasting materials?


reply posted on 16-12-2012 @ 10:49 PM by uk alienhunter
Originally posted by nerbot
reply to
post by Merriman Weir



Great idea, but....as usual, someone thinks it needs to be modern looking, high tech and made of plastic.

I was initially impressed when I read the story but disillusioned when I clicked the link.

We live in a world of surplus and waste, and people think we need more?

Great idea, lousy concept to bring to the market.

Profit, recognition, and ultimately it won't catch on because those who understand and need these ideas will make their own from scrap. Yay!



Really?? Seems far more logical to just spend £3 on the device rather than have to source all the parts, fix it all together etc.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Pokemon discovered in Venezuela
  Posted 14 days ago with 47 member flags
89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
Amazing snowflake images that you have never seen before.
  Posted 14 days ago with 44 member flags
Energy Solutions THEY don\'t want you to know about
  Posted 14 days ago with 35 member flags
Does this video show a working self propelled magnetic engine?
  Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags
Viruses: alive or not?
  Posted 11 days ago with 30 member flags
NASA reveals secrets it has hidden on the Curiosity rover.
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags