This topic is in the General Conspiracy Discussion discussion forum.  (rss)


CSN and MRC are biased, conservative news groups




Topic started on 23-10-2004 @ 10:09 PM by Jamuhn


Many people on here like to use the Cybercast News Service (CNS) as a relibale source of information. I am here to tell you different. CNS is a child organization of the Media Research Center (MRC).

From the MRC website:

Leaders of America's conservative movement have long believed that within the national news media a strident liberal bias existed that influenced the public's understanding of critical issues. On October 1, 1987, a group of young determined conservatives set out to not only prove - through sound scientific research - that liberal bias in the media does exist and undermines traditional American values, but also to neutralize its impact on the American political scene.



Cybercast News Service (CNSNews.com) is an indispensable on-line source for conservatives in the media, public policy and at the grassroots level, for news as it should be reported---accurate, balanced, and unfiltered.


A conservative news source is claiming to be unbiased! Give me a break, these two are just as worse as the phantom liberal media they are fighting against. Countless times have I seen members of ATS bringing up their articles, yet you will not find any of the same information reported by any reliable news source or even the White House itself.

Conclusion: This news source is putting out knowignly false information that cannot be backed up. Just recently, a member of ATS linked to a CSN article claiming to provide proof that Al Qaeda and Saddam are in cahoots. Yet, these copies show nothing of the sort.

I hope this thread will go to show these organizations are clearly biased and give knowingly false information.

[edit on 23-10-2004 by Jamuhn]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-10-2004 @ 10:11 PM by Nerdling


Indeed, I totally agree that these cannot be produced as sources in conversation due to the highly biased nature. You could probably add Newsmax.com and Drudge to the highly biased categories.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-10-2004 @ 10:28 PM by Jamuhn


Yea, itd be nice to see if someone else actually picked up on this. You'd think they would, wouldn't you.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:






ATS MIX Podcasts:


Recently Added Videos















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , ,


















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.068 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )

thread