It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by begoodbees
Isn't all this speculation anyway?
If you have nothing relevant to bring to the table I am not going to entertain your objections any longer.
Originally posted by iterationzero
reply to post by begoodbees
If you have nothing relevant to bring to the table I am not going to entertain your objections any longer.
That's fine. I don't expect you to entertain anything you don't want to. But your position of offhandedly dismissing facts that have been presented to you speaks to the lack of honesty and openness with which you've approached this discussion. This is doubly so as you've sought to silence those who disagree with you by crying "Indoctrination!" at every step and leveled unfounded charges of intellectual elitism against anyone who tries to present evidence contrary to your position.
Originally posted by Toadmund
reply to post by BlackManINC
I don't see anything wrong with the ancient alien theory.
If you read into it a lot of it makes sense.
Check out ;
www.bibleufo.com
www.bibleufo.com...
Or even open up your OT to Ezekiel and think of what he saw as a spacecraft and not necessarily god.edit on 16-12-2012 by Toadmund because: add link
Originally posted by begoodbees
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by begoodbees
Anyone who says that spontaneous evolution of species is a proven fact of science is either indoctrinated or dishonest.This is a fact.edit on 16-12-2012 by begoodbees because: (no reason given)
No one said it is spontaneous. That goes against evolutionary theory.
This thread is about spontaneous evolution, it is in the op. Guided or controlled evolution is essentially the same thing as creation is it not?
Originally posted by begoodbees
To be clear this is what I mean when I say spontaneous.
5
: developing or occurring without apparent external influence, force, cause, or treatment
By this definition all scientific experiments are excluded due to the influence of the scientists.edit on 16-12-2012 by begoodbees because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by begoodbees
reply to post by BlackManINC
I have not watched the videos but I did find it curious that in the ancient aliens series the whole thing was done from an evolutionary point of view. I would imagine that anyone who has a viewpoint contrary to spontaneous evolution would never be given a pulpit on tv of any kind. Religious networks aside of course.
I personally believe the anunnaki were the fallen angels pretending to be our creators and gods. Of course I could never prove that and would never even try, but it does seem to fit the big picture. Greek mythology speaks of gods breeding with humans and creating demigods ( or giants in the bible) such as hercules and thor from the norse legends I believe.
This seems to correlate with the biblical stories of the fallen ones.I think they are three distinct points of view all telling the same story. Sumerian, Hebrew and Greek. Not to mention other ancient texts from India, China and everyplace on earth there are either written or verbally passed down stories that all kind of say the same thing.
I suppose you could call that evidence for creation and against evolution.edit on 16-12-2012 by begoodbees because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by begoodbees
To be clear this is what I mean when I say spontaneous.
5
: developing or occurring without apparent external influence, force, cause, or treatment
By this definition all scientific experiments are excluded due to the influence of the scientists.edit on 16-12-2012 by begoodbees because: (no reason given)
There is always external influence. How could there not be? That's what drives evolution to begin with.
And no, not all scientific experiments are excluded. If you believe that, you have no idea how experiments work. And regardless, this has been observed happening naturally in the wild. It is all in the link I previously provided.
Originally posted by begoodbees
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by begoodbees
To be clear this is what I mean when I say spontaneous.
5
: developing or occurring without apparent external influence, force, cause, or treatment
By this definition all scientific experiments are excluded due to the influence of the scientists.edit on 16-12-2012 by begoodbees because: (no reason given)
There is always external influence. How could there not be? That's what drives evolution to begin with.
And no, not all scientific experiments are excluded. If you believe that, you have no idea how experiments work. And regardless, this has been observed happening naturally in the wild. It is all in the link I previously provided.
I am sorry, I have stated it as simply as possible, everything in your statement is just plain nonsense. Perhaps you don't know what external influence means but I am not able to give you a grade school education.Good Luck to you.
Originally posted by begoodbees
reply to post by paradox
Everything is explained in my previous posts. Feel free to read them if you like.