It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
In the end, cherish life, spread the love, use your noggin, and question everything. EVERYthing.edit on 13-12-2012 by ManjushriPrajna because: (no reason given)edit on 13-12-2012 by ManjushriPrajna because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
When the 21st goes by, and a lot of people out there who listened to the woo woo's and con artists realize they were mislead, we're going to see a mass conversion into skeptics take place.
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
When the 21st goes by, and a lot of people out there who listened to the woo woo's and con artists realize they were mislead, we're going to see a mass conversion into skeptics take place.
1. What are woo woo's?
2. What are skeptics?
3. Are these masses of converted skeptics going to be able to realize that we are, in your own words, 'all God'?
edit on 13-12-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
When the 21st goes by, and a lot of people out there who listened to the woo woo's and con artists realize they were mislead, we're going to see a mass conversion into skeptics take place.
1. What are woo woo's?
2. What are skeptics?
3. Are these masses of converted skeptics going to be able to realize that we are, in your own words, 'all God'?
edit on 13-12-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
1. Woo woo is an affectionate word for people who firmly believe in something, usually something that seems absurd, and ignores all evidence to the contrary (though that definition is probably not completely adequate).
2. A skeptic is a person who doesn't generally just accept things told to them, and more so questions it and seeks a better answer. Now, there's plenty of "chronic" skeptics out there who are, to some degree, cynical. But a good skeptic is one who isn't hostile towards statements and "truths", but someone who seeks out claims and picks them apart, not particularly for themselves, but for those who may be prone to believing in them blindly. A good example, in my opinion, would be Phage.
3. Baby steps, my friend.
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
reply to post by BlueMule
1. I don't know. I have none of those, and I haven't seen any viable proof that those actually exist.
2. Sure there are. I think I'm a good skeptic (I try to be good anyways).
3. Not an evasion at all. I don't expect everybody to see nothing out of the ordinary happen on the 21st, go to bed, and on the 22nd they wake up with the realization that they're God. But when you get right down to the meat of reality, it's the only logical conclusion. Of course, I'm not using God in the context of any particular religion, but God as the name amongst a multitude of names given to something that cannot truly be named, described, or perceived by the senses. Only felt.
]collingswoodbirther 1 day ago
It is disingenuous of you to repeat the Straw Man argument that 2012ers are saying the world is? ending on 12/21/12. We are not. Of those who find 12/21/12 significant, no one I am aware is saying that. The Maya said each Age ("Sun") ended with a cataclysm. These are depicted on the calendar stone. "The world is not ending on Dec. 21st" is a deceptive meme promulgating disinformation and inoculating against knowledge of what is coming."
[/ex
www.youtube.com...
reply to post by ManjushriPrajna
lol i said sum it up
i've emphasized my point[s] for clarity
though not interested in posters credentials, have a star for due diligence
regarding your argument with bluemule much proof of psi was obtained in the "mysteriously forgotten" 70's
[which is a nother subject in itself]
will presume to "agree" with you [and no doubt bluemule will too] that there's no such thing as "instant" transcendence/enlightment/illumination [save the moment it's finally achieved, of course]edit on 13-12-2012 by DerepentLEstranger because: added edit & comment
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
reply to post by BlueMule
1. I don't know. I have none of those, and I haven't seen any viable proof that those actually exist.
"Viable proof"? What's that supposed to mean?
Using the same standards as any other branch of science, there is significant evidence for parapsychological functioning. The body of parapsychological evidence is very big and very real and very significant and it's out there for anyone who takes the initiative. The fact that you are unaware of this, means that somewhere along the line you 'just accepted' some scientism dogma. The same ol' dogma that every "skeptic" spouts...that there is "no evidence".
2. Sure there are. I think I'm a good skeptic (I try to be good anyways).
You seem like a nice guy but that alone doesn't make you a good skeptic. A good skeptic doesn't just sit there waiting for his friendly neighboorhood mainstream scientist to bring him "viable proof" of psi if and when it should surface. He seeks it out and reads such things as parapsychology textbooks, for starters.
3. Not an evasion at all. I don't expect everybody to see nothing out of the ordinary happen on the 21st, go to bed, and on the 22nd they wake up with the realization that they're God. But when you get right down to the meat of reality, it's the only logical conclusion. Of course, I'm not using God in the context of any particular religion, but God as the name amongst a multitude of names given to something that cannot truly be named, described, or perceived by the senses. Only felt.
Do self-awarded badges of "skepticism" and "rationality" help people to feel God? Generally speaking, I mean.
edit on 13-12-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
another "prophet" claiming "nothing will happen"
i'll admit yours was better redacted and less offensive
until you used woo-woo and gave yourself away
i'll just let this poster from youtube sum it up for me
]collingswoodbirther 1 day ago
It is disingenuous of you to repeat the Straw Man argument that 2012ers are saying the world is? ending on 12/21/12. We are not. Of those who find 12/21/12 significant, no one I am aware is saying that. The Maya said each Age ("Sun") ended with a cataclysm. These are depicted on the calendar stone. "The world is not ending on Dec. 21st" is a deceptive meme promulgating disinformation and inoculating against knowledge of what is coming.
[/ex
www.youtube.com...
I'm not saying 2012's all believe the world will end. No offense, but it seems you didn't read the entire post and automatically went on the offense. 2012ers run the gambit, but the most popular ones involving pole shifts, ascensions, and evil stars looming into our solar system simply won't happen. I can guarantee you they won't happen, and I'm not afraid to make that claim because on the 22nd I'll be right here again (probably reading threads about how the "date was wrong" or something).
So no, I'm not creating a Straw Man. Those are things that they believe. What? You think I just made up those theories and applied them to people who think everything will be hunky-dory on the 21st?
Also, I'm not sure how I feel about you quoting someone with the screen name ""collingswoodbirther" who believes in something called the "Sign of Q", that we'll experience a pole shift (apparently an instantaneous one, defying the laws of physics), and that Obama will be resurrected after being assassinated. You might want to find more reliable (and down to earth) people to reference.
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
I know about parapsychology.
As Carl Sagan once put it, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."
That is something parapsychology just doesn't provide.
Until parapsychology pushes one of their subjects into the limelight and shows that said-subject can do anything parapsychological, I'm going to continue to question that particular branch of pseudoscience. How many psychics have been proven bogus? How many spoon benders have been debunked?
I don't rely on scientists. But one thing I do do? I listen to what they have to say. Because if I had a choice between relying on information given to me by a scientist, and information given to me by a guy that says he can telepathically communicate with reptilians... Well, you can take a wild guess as to who has more validity in my books.
You won't need any badges to feel "it", whatever you want to call "it". In fact, you won't need any help feeling it. You just feel it, it's there and very real, because you're it.