It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by diqiushiwojia
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by diqiushiwojia
They belong to Japan. Japan can nationalize them all they want.
I have already explained why Japan's claim is against the Cairo Declaration.
China is being a bully, it's very clear. How can the Chinese expect anyone to take them serious after looking at a map showing what they claim as their territorial waters, and compare that to what their territorial waters are under internationally recognized standards. It's laughable.
That is a red herring. The Nan Hai and the Diaoyu Islands are two different disputes altogether.
Japan took the islands in the 1800's. It was not until AFTER resources were found that China said gimme gimme.
The PRC protested against the San Fran Treaty.edit on 23-12-2012 by diqiushiwojia because: (no reason given)
Japan shall be stripped of all islands she has seized or occupied in the Pacific since the beginning of World War I in 1914.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by diqiushiwojia
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by diqiushiwojia
They belong to Japan. Japan can nationalize them all they want.
I have already explained why Japan's claim is against the Cairo Declaration.
China is being a bully, it's very clear. How can the Chinese expect anyone to take them serious after looking at a map showing what they claim as their territorial waters, and compare that to what their territorial waters are under internationally recognized standards. It's laughable.
That is a red herring. The Nan Hai and the Diaoyu Islands are two different disputes altogether.
Japan took the islands in the 1800's. It was not until AFTER resources were found that China said gimme gimme.
The PRC protested against the San Fran Treaty.edit on 23-12-2012 by diqiushiwojia because: (no reason given)
It is not against the Cairo Declaration.
Japan shall be stripped of all islands she has seized or occupied in the Pacific since the beginning of World War I in 1914.
As I showed, these islands were taken in the 1800's.
It is not a red herring. It shows China is not after what is fair and just, it is after everything it can gobble up regardless of whether it is legally theirs, or morally theirs, or it is logical.
The PRC can protest, they were not the representatives of China at the time, which is why they were not invited. The PRC acknowledges the islands should go to Taiwan anyway, the ROC would own them then not the PRC. So the PRC has ZERO claim to the islands, only the ROC does. When did the ROC make the PRC their proxy in this matter?
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by diqiushiwojia
I already proved the Senkaku islands belong to Japan, not China. China is in error, you have shown zero evidence. Cairo Declaration was about islands AFTER 1914. Senkaku islands were Japanese in the 1800's. There is no legal basis for them to have been given to China after WW2.
If they were not governed by the US in 1945 they would have gone directly back to Japan, as they were Japanese islands in the 1800's.
It is their [ROC, US and UK] purpose that Japan shall be stripped of all the islands in the Pacific which she has seized or occupied since the beginning of the first World War in 1914, and that all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such as Manchuria, Formosa, and The Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China.
China did not ask for them until AFTER they were found to be resource rich, nearly 40 years after the end of the war.
Yes the PRC and the ROC agree, they agree the Senkaku islands are part of the Taiwan territory. As the ROC controls Taiwan, that would make the Senkaku ROC property. Now the PRC might claim Taiwan, just as the ROC claim mainland China. As you said, their claims, and reality, are not the same.
The map of Chinese claims and what they claim as their national waters shows their bully attitude and that they care nothing for fair and legal, only what they can bully others into giving them.
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
I'm tired of doing research. I have been having to do all sorts of online research and I'm afraid I'm going to get a migraine. I still want to know some more about this but I'd like someone who claims to know about the capture of these Islands by Japan in the first place.... I want you to tell me why that shenanigan went down and explain any congruency it had to the current world events of those times.
If I can get some cooperation, I bet this is going to be fun and enlightening.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Japan found the islands in the 1880's, they were uninhabited. They went to war with the Chinese and won. Part of the surrender was the Treaty of Shimonoseki, in which China ceded the islands to the Japanese, in 1895
In 1945 part of the San Francisco treaty took some of these lands, specifically Formosa, which is now Taiwan, and it was given to the ROC. The Senkaku islands were specificially not given back to China. China did not petition for them to be returned until AFTER resources were found.
Originally posted by diqiushiwojia
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Japan found the islands in the 1880's, they were uninhabited. They went to war with the Chinese and won. Part of the surrender was the Treaty of Shimonoseki, in which China ceded the islands to the Japanese, in 1895
Japan investigated the islands in secret and found that they were Chinese lands. That's why they didn't formally incorporate the lands until 1895, when they acquired Taiwan.
In 1945 part of the San Francisco treaty took some of these lands, specifically Formosa, which is now Taiwan, and it was given to the ROC. The Senkaku islands were specificially not given back to China. China did not petition for them to be returned until AFTER resources were found.
For the last time, the PRC did protest after the San Fran Treaty was signed!
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
The Communist Leadership of China has shifted it's gaze from Taiwan to Japan as the Communist Leadership of China lost a huge amount of Prestige and wishes to SAVE FACE by once again making an attempt to garnish respect of it's own people after the humiliation that occurred when China's own High Ranking Military Leadership was STUNNED during their visit to the United States where they attended U.S. Military War Games as well as were allowed to visit several U.S. Military bases where they were allowed to witness the testing of several Ultra-High Tech. U.S. Military Weapon Systems that caused the Chinese Military Leadership to inform the Communist Leadership that any Invasion of Taiwan would be doomed to failure.
This visit also prompted the Chinese Military Leadership to embarrass the Communist Leadership by stating to the World Press that the U.S. has nothing to fear from the Chinese Military as it is Multiple Decades behind the U.S. Military in Military Weapons Tech.
This U.S. Military Plan to show the Chinese Military exactly what they would be getting into should they attempt an invasion of Taiwan most likely stopped the planned Chinese Invasion of Taiwan. The Communist Leadership is still attempting to save face and with the discovery of Energy Reserves around these Islands it offered the Communists another way to flex their muscles.
The reality is that both China and Japan know that any attack of Japanese Territory would spell the end of any attacking force that was presented by China. The U.S. defends Japan and is responsible for Japans security. China will Bitch and Moan but in the end it will do NOTHING.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
I'm not really sure why you two are trying to make what we were talking about here (the Islands) about a Chinese invasion but seeing as how there are already multiple threads about this... it really does make you sound freaking paranoid.
I have no idea why BOTH of you went from us discussing their motives with the Islands, automatically to a Chinese lead invasion.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
I'm not really sure why you two are trying to make what we were talking about here (the Islands) about a Chinese invasion but seeing as how there are already multiple threads about this... it really does make you sound freaking paranoid.
I have no idea why BOTH of you went from us discussing their motives with the Islands, automatically to a Chinese lead invasion.
China asks army to be ready for regional war
That is the thread title. This thread has nothing to do with Islands. I have no idea why you are clueless a Chinese invasion is being discussed in a thread titled 'China asks army to be ready for regional war'.
Then again you have been clueless about everything you have posted, so no surprise.