It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by arpgme
At most this proves that the universe is not infinite. Our universe is something "a packet of space/time", so since it is something, we can treat it like the variable "X" and it would be strange to say that "X" is infinite - so you are correct there, however, this is just speaking about the universe, this is not speaking about the omniverse - the "place" (for lack of a better word), where there is an infinite amount of parallel universes (multiverse).
By the way, if infinity doesn't exist, what is the largest number and what is the smallest? If something isn't infinite then it has a start and end point - but if that start point/end point is be continuously increased without end (highest number + 1 more, highest number + 2 more), then that seem to be the perfect description of infinity.edit on 15-12-2012 by arpgme because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by NorEaster
Infinity describes anything that cannot be quantified or valued at the current time. Yes, it is used as a placeholder term, but that does not give any more relevance to the OP, who assumes, from what I can gather, that nothing is unquantifiable.
I honestly think that as human beings, there are some things that are just beyond our intellectual capability, which the OP refuses to acknowledge. Come to think of it, all the OP seems to be interested in doing as trash-talking anyone who disagrees with them. Just thought I would mention, as well, that Calculus is not theoretical, but was invented to solve problems which algebra could not. You guys can debate me all day long, but I take the words of Sir Isaac Newton(possibly one of the brilliant scientists to have ever lived) over anyone on this website any day of the week. I honestly could not explain what Newton says better than he can, so I would also relegate for anyone on the side of the OP to read some of his brilliant works before dismissing what I say as a "because I said so" argument. Also, university professors will fail an entire essay simply because Wikipedia is in the bibliography, so I would be more careful about your sources if I were you. I'm not saying you're 100% wrong, I am merely saying that there are better websites out there for information like this (NSF.gov or Science.gc.ca being the best two I can gather off the top of my head). Contrary to what the OP may think, I am not just pulling this out of my rear.edit on 14/12/2012 by xXxinfidelxXx because: grammar
Originally posted by QueenofWeird
You mean that quanta are discreet and not continuous therefor there is no infinity as in infinite numbers between let's say 1 and 2?
Originally posted by QueenofWeird
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by Gregorian
Actually, infinite is the description of anything which cannot be quantified, therefore it is not a value in and of itself, from what I can gather from Newton's Principia.
Well infinity is like a growth that goes on for ever, always one step extra.
Originally posted by JimTSpock
reply to post by NorEaster
I think I can see what you're trying to say. Is it that in physics we have not observed the existence of infinity? If so that is a fair point to make, but it does not preclude the possibility for infinity to exist. Thus you have not 'debunked' infinity which I assume means to prove that it does not exist.
You must prove that time will end and so will the universe. You have not done this.
If you think you know better fair enough but I don't think you do.
Dr Michio Kaku: There are many types of infinity.
Einstein withdrew his constant with no small amount of embarrassment
Originally posted by digital01anarchy
reply to post by TheSubversiveOne
lol the basis of your knowledge lays in the idea that because humans do not live forever nothing does. given the fact you have only lived on one planet, in one small portion of the universe with only a limited amount of time in which humans have had the capacity to understand science i believe you are jumping to conclusions. Even given the amount of knowledge we humans have its a stunning display of ignorance to actually think you or anybody else has a freaken clue. We have progressed but the major answers allude us like the plague.
Originally posted by arpgme
At most this proves that the universe is not infinite. Our universe is something "a packet of space/time", so since it is something, we can treat it like the variable "X" and it would be strange to say that "X" is infinite - so you are correct there, however, this is just speaking about the universe, this is not speaking about the omniverse - the "place" (for lack of a better word), where there is an infinite amount of parallel universes (multiverse).
By the way, if infinity doesn't exist, what is the largest number and what is the smallest? If something isn't infinite then it has a start and end point - but if that start point/end point is be continuously increased without end (highest number + 1 more, highest number + 2 more), then that seem to be the perfect description of infinity.edit on 15-12-2012 by arpgme because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by iwilliam
1- Don't quit your day job, OP. I say that with all sincerity, though more than a little amusement.
4- Disproving infinity is, IMHO next to impossible, if not impossible.
Are you considering only infinity by addition, or are you also considering infinity by division? If there is no such thing as infinity, please tell me the maximum number of hypothetical divisions one can make in something.
Having no limits or boundaries in time, space, extent, or magnitude
5- And this is really just my preference, but "perfect rhyme" is a horrible convention, far over-used in modern rap music, and makes a lyric sound lazy and terrible. Just saying.
Why are you so afraid of that which you don't understand? Why do you so desire to shove everything into your existing paradigm or knowledge? What scares you so much about not having all the answers?
Originally posted by JimTSpock
reply to post by NorEaster
That is simply not the case. If it were there would be no modern theories of infinite universes etc etc etc. We don't know everything in physics. You are incorrect my friend. The standard model is incomplete and does not preclude the possibility for infinity in numerous ways to exist.
If you think you know better fair enough but I don't think you do.
Dr Michio Kaku: There are many types of infinity.
forums.philosophyforums.com...
By the way some things Einstein said have been found to be wrong, no one knows everything.
Einstein withdrew his constant with no small amount of embarrassment
www.slate.com...
Perhaps you should look into the current state of theoretical physics, there are many interesting theories which are designed to fit the standard model. No one is saying what you're saying because it's simplistic rubbish. I'm done.
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by NorEaster
Hove big is our existence?
Since the infinite does not exist, you must have a measurement/scale of hove big/large our existence is.
So hove large is finite existence?