posted on Dec, 12 2012 @ 11:42 PM
Maybe I’m too naïve, but I could never be certain anything I have seen is completely bogus or some form of disinfo. Personally I try to be somewhat
selective with my posts, so would that cause me to be labeled insincere in some way? I’m genuinely very curious how to determine without question
that a thread is misleading.
Having said that, however, more than a few times after I started a thread, I would get some responses that were far off topic, intentionally
inflammatory, accusatory, or seemingly an attempt to change the subject. So your concern would include both those who create new threads and those who
In the scheme of themes, the reason I am here is because of all the sites I have seen, ATS seems to offer significantly more intelligent debate and
discussion and it flows in a manner I can work with as a computer neophyte. Perhaps/probably the ones with an outside vested interest consider ATS to
be at or near the top of the “conspiracy” chain? That would make us a perceived threat and if I were in their position I would absolutely want to
know all I could about ATS and it’s members.
Finally, the scary thing to me is that we all know they can dig as deep as they want with even the minimal information they can scavenge from our
visits, posts, and registration. We surrendered our first rights by being born, continued when we got our computers, extended further when we
connected to the world wide web, and practically invited suspicion when we signed up on the site.
What are they after indeed?