It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The robotic arm on NASA's Mars rover Curiosity held the rover's Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) camera in more than 50 positions in one day to generate a single scene combining all the images, creating a high-resolution, full-color portrait of the rover itself.
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by 0bserver1
I am curious as to what NASA actually say with regard to the question, of who took the self portrait of the rover. I cannot help but think of a dog when I see the word rover. Are the masses who believe everything NASA tells them without question - are little more than faithful dogs???
I question the fact we the populous have been receiving blurry out of focus photographs of the moon for years. Suddenly we are given clear in focus photographs from the rover -purportedly on the surface of Mars. It could very well be photographed from a studio set or an isolated area of a desert anywhere on planet Earth.
NASA employ artists - the type who are talented and are adept with the use of air brush technology and electronic technology that would supersede anything photoshop could manufacture.
I don't believe that the rover is actually off the planet but I do believe that we have the technology and the people willing to perpetrate a story that rover is in outer space. I looked at the link you provided and the tracks don't seem to make sense and you are definitely right about the footprints. They are indentations - but of what - by whom and when????
Much Peace...
edit on 12-12-2012 by Amanda5 because: grammar
Originally posted by SpearMint
It's made from many images stitched together taken by an arm. They are not footprints, do you seriously think NASA are stupid? They're not. If they were faking things, they wouldn't let anything slip, especially not something that obvious.
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by eriktheawful
I respect your opinion and you are free to question the validity of my opinion. I am free to question all the lies and delusions we have been fed for many many many generations.
Have you read Animal Farm or 1984 by chance - it will tell you that in the future any person who tells the truth will be seen as a traitor - an infidel - a person not to be trusted. Telling the truth these days is an act of treason just as the mentioned book titles predicted/foretold/warned.
NASA employ artists and have technology that would be on par and better than that which is utilised by the major film production houses. Think about it and as an exercise in natural psychology - remove the word co-incidence from your vocabulary and then review all you know - or think you know. Take your time there is an entire universe of learning to examine.
Much Peace...
Originally posted by 0bserver1
First of all I think this is one of the most amazing self-portrait I ever have seen from Curiosity.
And as always its taken on beautiful day with blue skies........
But some elements of this picture makes no sense to me and a bit curious ? , Like how could they manage to make this picture without someone else making this shot? because it looks like the photo made with a wide angle lens? and where are the tracks on the left bottom side come from? (marked with red arrow) because they look like footsteps to me?
Full size Self-Portait Curiosity
But as always around assumption out of proportional visions , curiosity kills the thread..
peace....edit on 12-12-2012 by 0bserver1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by transmundane
There was a handle just outside the door. They built the camera into the landing leg of the LEM, and had it prepointed at the door. When Neil Armstrong was on the ladder, he pulled the handle, and the camera dropped out of the leg on its arm. No one had to go out and set anything up.
Originally posted by 0bserver1
reply to post by transmundane
Indeed you start to notice things that don't totally coop with the reality this all happened.
I still can't really figure out how the supposedly strange footprint markings got there in the fireplace? really weird
.