It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is the fallacy of capitalization. The corporations suck as much as they can from the people. It is not sustainable and never has been. Another way to express it would be that greed increases exponentially. It cannot last, once you have bled the people dry your entire society collapses.
P
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is the fallacy of capitalization. The corporations suck as much as they can from the people. It is not sustainable and never has been. Another way to express it would be that greed increases exponentially. It cannot last, once you have bled the people dry your entire society collapses.
P
Is there something stopping you from being a shareholder of that company and reaping the same benefits that they do?
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is the fallacy of capitalization. The corporations suck as much as they can from the people. It is not sustainable and never has been. Another way to express it would be that greed increases exponentially. It cannot last, once you have bled the people dry your entire society collapses.
P
Is there something stopping you from being a shareholder of that company and reaping the same benefits that they do?
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is the fallacy of capitalization. The corporations suck as much as they can from the people. It is not sustainable and never has been. Another way to express it would be that greed increases exponentially. It cannot last, once you have bled the people dry your entire society collapses.
P
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is the fallacy of capitalization. The corporations suck as much as they can from the people. It is not sustainable and never has been. Another way to express it would be that greed increases exponentially. It cannot last, once you have bled the people dry your entire society collapses.
P
Is there something stopping you from being a shareholder of that company and reaping the same benefits that they do?
Originally posted by pheonix358
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is the fallacy of capitalization. The corporations suck as much as they can from the people. It is not sustainable and never has been. Another way to express it would be that greed increases exponentially. It cannot last, once you have bled the people dry your entire society collapses.
P
Is there something stopping you from being a shareholder of that company and reaping the same benefits that they do?
Yes, it is a thing called ETHICS.
P
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by pheonix358
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is the fallacy of capitalization. The corporations suck as much as they can from the people. It is not sustainable and never has been. Another way to express it would be that greed increases exponentially. It cannot last, once you have bled the people dry your entire society collapses.
P
Is there something stopping you from being a shareholder of that company and reaping the same benefits that they do?
Yes, it is a thing called ETHICS.
P
It's unethical to own stock now? My point was that the company is public, and anyone can own a portion of it. Ethics, really? That's a pretty weak argument. 20 bucks says you give money to some other organization just as bad or worse.
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is the fallacy of capitalization. The corporations suck as much as they can from the people. It is not sustainable and never has been. Another way to express it would be that greed increases exponentially. It cannot last, once you have bled the people dry your entire society collapses.
Originally posted by boncho
It's unethical to own stock now? My point was that the company is public, and anyone can own a portion of it. Ethics, really? That's a pretty weak argument. 20 bucks says you give money to some other organization just as bad or worse.
The acknowledged aim of socialism is to take the means of production out of the hands of the capitalist class and place them into the hands of the workers. This aim is sometimes spoken of as public ownership, sometimes as common ownership of the production apparatus. There is, however, a marked and fundamental difference....
Public ownership is the ownership, i.e. the right of disposal, by a public body representing society, by government, state power or some other political body. The persons forming this body, the politicians, officials, leaders, secretaries, managers, are the direct masters of the production apparatus; they direct and regulate the process of production; they command the workers. Common ownership is the right of disposal by the workers themselves; the working class itself — taken in the widest sense of all that partake in really productive work, including employees, farmers, scientists — is direct master of the production apparatus, managing, directing, and regulating the process of production which is, indeed, their common work.
"Public" companies are capitalist companies. Most owners are private owners not workers from the company.
These same companies that introduced planned obsolescence, that shift jobs to places where workers have no rights.
I still have a frypan that is over half a century old. It works and it works very well. Buy one these days and I am lucky to get 2 years out of it.
Originally posted by boncho
Just take a look at some of the public companies that have been driven into the ground post continuous losses because they are paid for by the government, through taxes of the people. If the government has shown us anything in the last 100 years, its how they are adept at mismanaging money.
There is no system incorruptible or that hasn't been exploited. But you missed the point I was making anyways...
Originally posted by boncho
So if everyone owned a frying pan that lasted 50 years, and all the frying pan makers jobless, and the frying pan manufacturers went out of business. Would you be blaming them again for not having jobs available to people