Clackamas Town center Shooting Portland, happening now., page 13


Pages: <<  10    11    12    13    14    15    16  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 79 times


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:15 PM by NarrowGate
reply to post by Druscilla



Another example of dangerous extremity.

Why do you think fully automatic weapons are necessary? Who is going to carry an AK everywhere they go in case something goes down?

A fully automatic glock would have been a disaster in this situation. Teach people to make their shots count from a young age, and deaths will be avoided.

Everyone should be allowed to carry a semi-automatic pistol. I personally would prefer a single-shot rifle to a fully auto if it had to be one or the other.

On the other hand, criminals looking to kill a crowd of people would find full autos very useful.


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:20 PM by Destinyone
reply to post by NarrowGate



This is my exit stage left cue. Why is it, every single shooting story devolves into a shouting match over guns. Anyone remember, that 3 people are dead, as of 3 hours ago. We don't even know for sure how many may be injured....That this will be the memory that many, many people, will carry from now on, of Christmas....

Carry on with your vitriol.....

Des


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:23 PM by Hefficide
reply to post by PlausibleDeniability



While I had the TV on, one of the callers, two female eyewitnesses, said that one of the decedents was a woman in front of a Best Buy cellular phone kiosk.


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:23 PM by NarrowGate
Originally posted by Destinyone
reply to
post by NarrowGate



This is my exit stage left cue. Why is it, every single shooting story devolves into a shouting match over guns. Anyone remember, that 3 people are dead, as of 3 hours ago. We don't even know for sure how many may be injured....That this will be the memory that many, many people, will carry from now on, of Christmas....

Carry on with your vitriol.....

Des


Do you know how many people got shot today in America? I don't remember hearing about any of them... Why are these people special?

It is because this stuff is avoidable to an extent. Not that many people should be getting hit. Is that not blatantly obvious to you?


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:25 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by benrl



Hope all is well.
I live like 10 minutes away from there.
edit on 11-12-2012 by SLAYER69 because: I can!



reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:27 PM by Druscilla
Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to
post by Druscilla



Another example of dangerous extremity.

Why do you think fully automatic weapons are necessary? Who is going to carry an AK everywhere they go in case something goes down?

A fully automatic glock would have been a disaster in this situation. Teach people to make their shots count from a young age, and deaths will be avoided.

Everyone should be allowed to carry a semi-automatic pistol. I personally would prefer a single-shot rifle to a fully auto if it had to be one or the other.

On the other hand, criminals looking to kill a crowd of people would find full autos very useful.


By no means am I saying that people SHOULD carry automatic weapons.
I am, however, saying that everyone should have the OPTION to purchase, if they so desired.

Purchase. Carry. Option.
Key words.

Private property like malls in this case could have rules like, um, no firearms.
Security would be appropriately kitted to respond to anything from a population that has an option to purchase rotary cannon guns if they wanted and could afford it.
Anyone approaching mall with so much as a super-soaker would be well aware of Private Property + Armed Security + appropriate threat response rules applying to gun toting maniacs.


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:29 PM by telemetry
reply to post by SSPI07



Thanks for the confirmation on the parts you heard at least. I'm sure the good people over at RR will have that feed archived, for future reference.


----------------

Ruh roh.

Scanner said recently that they have a man with a weapon, lower level ramp at Sears. He is saying that he is CCSO but has no ID, etc.

Just got a report over the air of 1 in custody. Could be related, possible 2nd shooter?


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:31 PM by PlausibleDeniability
reply to post by SLAYER69



The great ex-marine Slayer lives in Portland? Did you get lost on the way home man? That place is hippie headquarters...people used to evil eye me when I wore my Army shirt to class at MtHood. Everytime. Idjits...

Run...far away


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:41 PM by MmmPie
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to
post by PlausibleDeniability



I grew a Goatee as camouflage


BRILLIANT.

Hope you got a nice collection of Northface Fleece and those sandals with the toes built in. I'll send you some tie dye shirts if you need them! There's plenty in stock up here near Olympia, WA.

When you think about Portland (stereotypes) mass shooting is one of the last places on Earth I'd relate to this place. Then again, I've also heard the gang activity is pretty rough at times, at least in certain areas.


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:44 PM by Hefficide
reply to post by MmmPie



From what I've seen, spree shootings tend to happen in lower crime areas. This may or may not be of importance, but does seem to be statistically accurate.

My opinion about that would be that lower crime areas are more controlled - thus creating an environment where younger people have less ability to blow off steam in less extreme ways.

This is not something I've researched, however, just "off the cuff" observation.

~Heff


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:48 PM by NarrowGate
reply to post by Druscilla



Ok fine in a perfect world.

What lends more credibility is that you can make your semi-auto automatic it just carries a long sentence with it. In the case of massacre suicides though I guess that is somewhat irrelevant now isn't it.

You have given me something to think about, I commend you for that.


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:50 PM by MmmPie
reply to post by Hefficide



Very interesting POV!


I can see how all of that mixed with, these low crime areas being relatively close to areas with spikes in crime rate could be a potentially easy target to act on.


Like that old adage goes..."it's like stealing candy from a baby".


I really think you should spend some time (if you have it) and research a handful of mass shootings and see if there really is a correlation to what you present. Would be interseting to see what kind of data you stumble upon.


reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:51 PM by NarrowGate
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to
post by MmmPie



From what I've seen, spree shootings tend to happen in lower crime areas. This may or may not be of importance, but does seem to be statistically accurate.

My opinion about that would be that lower crime areas are more controlled - thus creating an environment where younger people have less ability to blow off steam in less extreme ways.

This is not something I've researched, however, just "off the cuff" observation.

~Heff


. In high-crime areas a "shooting spree" happens often enough that they do not label it as such. Trust me, you don't even have most shootings making it to the news. Especially with ongoing investigations, or just stuff they don't want you to hear about.

I could provide links to stories about a couple that happened in my area (It is not high crime here, but 10 minutes down the road it is very high crime one of the highest in the country). Roller rinks getting shot up, people standing on the block in groups getting shot at....it goes on and on. More often than not though, you will be looking at 2 suspects and one victim. It is almost always like that from what I read about and hear about.
edit on 11-12-2012 by NarrowGate because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:54 PM by LadySkadi
reply to post by Hefficide


Just to put this in a bit of perspective, this is not downtown or NW Portland area we are talking about here. This is actually across the county line in Clackamas and it's just off of 82nd avenue which is well known drug/gang and prostitution areas. The mall itself has had longstanding issue with trouble. It's better then it was 10 years ago, but still not great. It's not an "upscale" area, by any stretch.
edit on 11-12-2012 by LadySkadi because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-12-2012 @ 09:57 PM by gnosticagnostic
reply to post by NarrowGate



My dear Narrow,

I do believe that dear des was simply stating that your taking over the thread and turning it into a rant about gun control... That isn't what the OP was about.. perhaps if you make a new thread about gun control in revelation of today's events... that way people can join you in the discussion at the appropriate thread...

Cheerios! Hope your well!

gnostic.
Pages: <<  10    11    12    13    14    15    16  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags