It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ChesterJohn
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by ChesterJohn
Those two books that you have cited, Acts, credited to Luke and Colossians, written supposedly by Paul, did not ever meet Jesus while he was alive.
St. Luke was born in Antioch. He was a gentile doctor who was a good and kind man. He heard about Jesus from the great apostle Paul and soon became a Christian.
Also, talking about witness who claim to have seen the "ghost of Jesus," after his death, is not the same as recounting the things he actually said and did when he alive.
Luke and Paul never met Jesus. Paul distorts and co-opts the teaching of Jesus for his own prideful gain.
If I am not mistaken their Bible does not say they saw a ghost.
See how easy it is for us to interject our opinions and not make a logical argument using their authority. You added your opinion that it is a ghost. You bring external opinions that have no basis of factual evidence and try to make it their authority. You will not win them by your lack of logical process and mere opinions you will only alienate them. show proof it was a ghost don't just make unsupported opinions and present them as fact.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
Here's a start.
1 Corinthians 4:15
For you can have 10,000 instructors in Christ, but you can't have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel.
For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ,.... Or "schoolmasters"; by whom he means the false teachers, whom, for argument sake, he admits to be instructors in Christ, or ministers of his, as in 2 Corinthians 11:23 and who were many, and of whose number the Corinthians boasted; though they were not so numerous as here supposed; for the expression is hyperbolical: perhaps some reference may be had to the multitude of schoolmasters, tutors, and governors, and who also were called "fathers", which those that were Jews of this church at Corinth had before they believed in Christ; as the members of the great sanhedrim, the great number of doctors, wise men, Scribes and Pharisees, who pretended to instruct them: now though it should be allowed, that the present teachers among them were instrumental in instructing them further in the knowledge of Christ; or as the Arabic version reads it, "in the love of Christ"; yet they had no hand in their conversion; the apostle first preached the Gospel to them, and ministerially laid Christ the foundation among them, and directed them unto him, and was the minister by whom they believed; these teachers at most and best built on his foundation, and that only wood, hay, and stubble; and whereas they were only a sort of schoolmasters, and not fathers, they taught with mercenary views, and for lucre's sake, and with severity, as such men do
How is Paul's death any more or less dramatic that the 10's of 1000's of men and women who were killed during the Jewish wars, at the same time in history?
To say they never met Jesus with no proof is only a opinion. Can you prove they never met.
Originally posted by windword
If people saw Jesus after he was already dead, then they saw a ghost.
In other words, Paul isn't boasting -- he's demonstrating the authority of his words, above those of the false teachers that were trying to steer the Corinthians wrong.
How is Paul's death any more or less dramatic that the 10's of 1000's of men and women who were killed during the Jewish wars, at the same time in history?
I don't remember saying anything about drama. I asked where his gain was, as you stated, in being a Christian. Paul was beaten, stoned, imprisoned and eventually executed, I fail to see how any of that is to his gain.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by adjensen
Ghosts are capable of taking physical form. This is documented, as in Haunting in Connecticut, based on a true story.
They were startled and frightened, thinking they saw a ghost. He said to them, "Why are you troubled, and why do doubts rise in your minds? Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself! Touch me and see; a ghost does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have." (Luke 24:37-39, NIV)
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by windword
If people saw Jesus after he was already dead, then they saw a ghost.
A ghost is a non-corporeal being, but the Bible states very clearly that Christ had a physical body, so he wasn't a ghost. If you believe from the Bible that people saw Jesus after the resurrection, then you must also believe from the Bible that he had a physical body.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
In other words, Paul isn't boasting -- he's demonstrating the authority of his words, above those of the false teachers that were trying to steer the Corinthians wrong.
Opinion and eyes and ears of the beholder.
To claim to be the ultimate authority over the interpretation of his place, and his interpretation of the purpose of the life and death of Jesus to be above all others, looks and sounds like pride to me.
I am writing this not to shame you but to warn you as my dear children. Even if you had ten thousand guardians in Christ, you do not have many fathers, for in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel. Therefore I urge you to imitate me. For this reason I have sent to you Timothy, my son whom I love, who is faithful in the Lord. He will remind you of my way of life in Christ Jesus, which agrees with what I teach everywhere in every church. (1 Corinthians 4:14-17 NIV)
Just because his fate was less than what he had hoped for or anticipated, that doesn't mean he didn't enter the fray with a prideful and exploitative purpose.
Where's the pride in urging people to follow in your example?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by windword
Are you saying that the two are known to be the same person or is it just a theory? Luke is called Lucius in Romans 16:21, Plutarch was renamed Lucius Mestrius Plutarchus when he became a Roman citizen. I think it's very likely the two are the same person.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by windword
But that's the whole point, isn't it? People say he died for our sins. Then they say he rose three days later, resurrected and as good as new. Doesn't that kind of defeat the point? Either he died or he didn't. You don't die and then come back. I'll give you five bucks for a coffee, then take that five bucks back as proof that I'm a good salesman. Oh, and you still have to give me that coffee or you'll be blacklisted.
What a joke.
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by windword
If people saw Jesus after he was already dead, then they saw a ghost.
A ghost is a non-corporeal being, but the Bible states very clearly that Christ had a physical body, so he wasn't a ghost. If you believe from the Bible that people saw Jesus after the resurrection, then you must also believe from the Bible that he had a physical body.
You know what I believe. If Jesus was up and about, walking, talking, physically interacting with people and eating, he didn't die, he survived the ordeal.
If Jesus was dead, then what they saw was a ghost. If it was a ghost that could manipulate the physical plane, then he was a poltergeist.