C 2012 XE54 at 141,000 miles or .589LD about 91 ft Tomorrow

page: 1
12

log in

join

posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 09:05 PM
link   
C 2012 XE54 at 141,000 miles or .589LD

Sometime tomorrow about haft way to the moon nothing much to worry about 91 feet
This is the fourth in one and a haft month and only two day’s notice again . Here







Now you remember this one





What about this one again





And again what about this one





So what I’m I trying to say. There a pattern showing up here do you see it.
This tell me that it not if we get hit by a Asteroid but when.
Now this pattern tell me that we will only get about 2 to 4 day notice at max so 3 as a average.
Not much time to do much about it for the localize area affected just think Arizona cracker size
Now this is only for the 100 to 200 ft

And don’t tell me it to remote of a change because there always somebody that do win the Loto Jack Pot
or Power Ball




posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 09:11 PM
link   
So are you saying that the parameter resets to zero on the Altitude chart?
Or is the X axis going to make its full 75 degree paradigm shift…
Mmmmm…

This could also mean that the vector is off by a few degrees, so scratch that last thought.



posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 09:13 PM
link   
Actually, come to think of it, the chart clearly shows that the vector stays on a true 45
Would that mean what I think it means???

Oh s##t this is not good. Am I reading this wrong?



posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 09:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by FinalCountdown
So are you saying that the parameter resets to zero on the Altitude chart?
Or is the X axis going to make its full 75 degree paradigm shift…
Mmmmm…

This could also mean that the vector is off by a few degrees, so scratch that last thought.


It more like if X meat Y you gone get a big SHTF Z

remember X * Y = Z



posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 09:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Trillium

Originally posted by FinalCountdown
So are you saying that the parameter resets to zero on the Altitude chart?
Or is the X axis going to make its full 75 degree paradigm shift…
Mmmmm…

This could also mean that the vector is off by a few degrees, so scratch that last thought.


It more like if X meat Y you gone get a big SHTF Z

remember X * Y = Z


busted! I knew my math was off!








































posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 09:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by FinalCountdown
Actually, come to think of it, the chart clearly shows that the vector stays on a true 45
Would that mean what I think it means???

Oh s##t this is not good. Am I reading this wrong?


Actually your are like a lot of my friend you may listen
But you do not hear what being said
edit on 10-12-2012 by Trillium because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 10:08 PM
link   
Took a series of 5 exposures of it a couple hours ago using a telescope in Spain over the internet. I stacked them and it's the series of 5 dashed lines in the image.

i319.photobucket.com...



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 01:11 AM
link   
I made a video about this exact subject.

www.youtube.com...

And I think the problem is that when space rocks bump into other space rocks
they bump into more space rocks. So no JPL orbital will ever be 100% accurate always.



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 03:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by NewThor7
I made a video about this exact subject.

www.youtube.com...

And I think the problem is that when space rocks bump into other space rocks
they bump into more space rocks. So no JPL orbital will ever be 100% accurate always.


Collisions between asteroids are exceedingly rare, even within the asteroid belt. It's not like star wars. A chain reaction like the one you described would be even more rare.



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 11:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by ngchunter

Originally posted by NewThor7
I made a video about this exact subject.

www.youtube.com...

And I think the problem is that when space rocks bump into other space rocks
they bump into more space rocks. So no JPL orbital will ever be 100% accurate always.


Collisions between asteroids are exceedingly rare, even within the asteroid belt. It's not like star wars. A chain reaction like the one you described would be even more rare.


Yes ngshunter I think your right but for me it that very small window that we can do someting about it
Or run from it
1 to 80 ft may just burn up no problem
at 90 to 200 ft only 2 to 4 day notice
200 and up are found way ahead of time and can evacuate local area.



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 11:31 AM
link   
well what ever happens with this,Asteroid Toutatis Fly-By here is link to watch it events.slooh.com... thought some might like alive link to see it.
edit on 11-12-2012 by bekod because: line edditing



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 02:45 PM
link   
Ummm.... I just noticed this...


Discovered in 1989, asteroid 4179 Toutatis is classed as a Potentially Hazardous Asteroid. On this approach to Earth, Toutatis will pass within 4.3 million miles - that's very close in astronomical terms for an object that is 3.4 miles in diameter!
Source

3.4 MILES in diameter? That's not 90 feet. Err... that one would tend to hurt and I guess it would just erase any satellites it smacked if it had been closer.



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 10:52 PM
link   
Whoa! Earth gets close shave by newfound asteroid


A newfound asteroid gave Earth a close shave early today, zipping between our planet and the moon just two days after astronomers first spotted it.


"The near-Earth asteroid 2012 XE54, which was discovered Sunday, came within 140,000 miles (230,000 kilometers) of our planet at about 5 a.m. EST Tuesday, researchers said. For comparison, the moon orbits Earth at an average distance of 240,000 miles or so (386,000 km).

Astronomers estimate that 2012 XE54 is about 120 feet (36 meters) wide — big enough to cause substantial damage if it slams into Earth someday. An object of similar size flattened 800 square miles (2,000 square km) of forest when it exploded above Siberia's Podkamennaya Tunguska River in 1908. "

Wow! is right! We are lucky again! We sure are. www.msnbc.msn.com...
edit on 11-12-2012 by RUFFREADY because: link woops added





new topics
top topics
 
12

log in

join