Hillary Clinton: Iran ‘Exports Terrorism’ to Mexico

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000

Originally posted by NavyDoc
I would be interesting to save this thread and see how many people negative about Clinton now, will vote for her in 2016. Kind of like all of the people I heard angry about the war and GITMO and drone attacks still voted for Obama even though he kept and expanded all of those things. Just an observation.

edit on 11-12-2012 by NavyDoc because: (no reason given)

I can tell you personally, the GOP will have to run someone along the lines of Dr. Strangelove for me to even consider voting for Hillary. She would have been a better alternative to Obama but that's also like saying drowning is preferable to burning to death. Err... yeah.. lol

As long as they don't floridate the water and pollute my vital essences, I'm good.

Star for a reference to one of my favorite films.


"You can't fight here! This is a WAR room!"

reply to post by Deetermined


Mr. Taylor was likely speaking about this or at least something similar.


This Hezbollah thing about trying to operate South and Central America is not news.

reply to post by Nephalim


And, who won't do anything about securing our borders?

Bush wouldn't, Obama certainly isn't.

Any jihadist wouldn't be concerned about smuggling drugs in, they're much more happy smuggling weapons of mass destruction. Bio-weapons, dirty nukes, ect.....

It would seem as if the US is hell bent on our destruction, also.

reply to post by Happy1


I suppose they're open to ideas.
feel free to clue them in.

Please Hiliary is great and most of America thinks she does a good job. National security exists for a reason. You do not know everything that governments known....who knows what any of them know because they keep things a secret.

reply to post by Corruption Exposed


The woman's sheer level of mind numbing ignorance never ceases to amaze me

Yet I am not shocked, she is 100% pro Zionist slime all the way. Go figure huh.

Oh what propaganda she weaves. Does anyone buy this line of B.S. these days? One would think it would be running thin by now.

Hilary Clinton makes me want to puke. Crazy that a ex lawyer and an ex president's wife could become a president all from popularity. Blows my mind.

Originally posted by Nephalim
reply to post by Deetermined

 

Mr. Taylor was likely speaking about this or at least something similar.

This Hezbollah thing about trying to operate South and Central America is not news.

edit on 11-12-2012 by Nephalim because: (no reason given)

America does not go looking for trouble. But, the guy in the video sure is. We have the right to defend ourselves from such people. If that means preemptive strikes, so be it. The world is a better place without merchants of terror and death such as this guy. The ungratefulness of the Arab world for all the aid we have provided over the years and their own failures to deal with their cultural flaws is disgusting.

Originally posted by GAOTU789
Here is some more. Took 30 secons to find this. You asked for their proof, some of it is in here...

homeland.house.gov...

Take it or leave it, again that's up to you. It is also referenced so you can follow the information further to corroborate it.

Bottom line is that these links are there and can be easily researched if one was inclined to do so.

Did you even read the PDF you linked to? It offers no proof. Furthermore, your using a government agency as a source to defend the government's position. I would have expected more from an ATS moderator. What's your agenda?

And where are all the liberals condemning our foreign policy of lies and endless wars?


Crickets...thought as much.

reply to post by Corruption Exposed


How can this be off topic lol it is his thread

Posted in the voice of Joe Pesci, acting the role of Anthony Spilotro in the movie Casino. He's talking to the Robert De Niro character, Ace Rothstein.

Spilotro: "Lemme get this straight. Angie (Hillary) says that Iran is causing the trouble in Mexico and that I gotta whack Iran?"

Rothstein: "Yeah."

Spilotro: "But you're telling me that Iran is not causing the trouble in Mexico and that I don't gotta whack Iran?

Rothstein: "Yeah."

Spilotro: "But there is trouble in Mexico?"

Rothstein (shrugs): "Yeah."

Spilotro: "Then I gotta whack Mexico. I feel like whacking Angie, but it looks like I'm gonna hafta take care of business down in Mexico. They got oil, right, just like Iran?"

Rothstein: "Yeah."

Just a few questions

1) If the US is well aware of such connection, then why keep highlighting the threat rather than eliminating it? Hell, we are bombing SUSPECTED militants or terrorists in Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan. Surely, the US has the capabilities to take out people who are a closer threat to us.

2) I can understand the fear of somebody coming through the Mexican (or Canadian) border and causing damage, but why must we forget the way most of the terrorist have gotten in so far. They entered the US Legally. Ever noticed that politicians hardly ever talk about terrorist getting in legally. Most just scream about the Mexican border.

reply to post by maddog99


Obvious answer: they're too busy collecting their free sh@#. to pay attention.

I guess I'll probably get a T&C, or something from a moderater for the obvious.

reply to post by Corruption Exposed





Univision did a great documentary on Iran called the "Iranian Threat".

For those wanting to watch it, it is in Spanish. Go direct to Youtube, within the Video. Use the CC and hit the translate tab.....

Mohsen Rabbani Born in Tobat Haidariah, Iran, in 1952, Mohsen Rabbani is considered as one of the most important promoters of the Iranian agenda in Latin America, with operations and connections from Venezuela to Argentina, including Brazil and Bolivia.

Between 1994 and 1998 he acted as cultural attaché for the Iranian embassy in Buenos Aires. At that same time, according to an investigation, he actively participated in the attacks in 1992 and 1994 against the Jewish community center AMIA, which resulted in many deaths.

Currently he is a fugitive sought after by the Interpol for the anti-Jewish attacks in Argentina.

Who is who in the Iranian threat in Latin America

"The objectives of the plan discussed were attacking in the first instance of cyber way to the United States and subsequently physically do it," said Juan Carlos Munoz Ledo, a Mexican computer expert who led the infiltration of diplomats. "That was what they wanted themselves both as Iranian embassies of Venezuela."

The recordings also show the current Venezuela consul in Miami, Livia Acosta, receiving and seeking information about the servers of U.S. nuclear plants. At the material time, Acosta worked as cultural attaché at the Embassy of Venezuela in Mexico.

- Muñoz: ... They were given the locations of every nuclear plant in the United States.
- Acosta: Oh look, that's good.
- Muñoz: And not only that but the key is missing a section.
- Acosta: Well, that should also give it to me.
- Muñoz: Yes, yes, no, yes, yes, yes.
- Acosta: Pa 'send it to the president, the defense chief security because the president is my friend. And is there with the president and the president goes up and down.
- Muñoz: And who is?
- Acosta: It's called Alexis Lopez
- Acosta: A general.

General Lopez, head of custody of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, would be the intermediary course that gave the information to the President.

(Link Translated)


The Iranian threat

There is a threat.

I wonder if the Iranians and Venezuelans are thinking of invading the US to protect freedom fighters in Texas from oppression by the federal government.

That would be right out of the Hillary Clinton playbook.

reply to post by ipsedixit


There is a threat, but Hillary shouldn't be the one exposing it.




Maniacal Laughter.......

Yep some people are slow to catch on and middle eastern and terrorism and mexico have been playing that game for years.

Not that I like Clinton because I don't.

Iran exports terrorism deal with it.

Oh



Ample evidence exists date back a decade.

A Senate report released ahead of the embargo time revealed that HSBC’s lax anti-money laundering policies allowed Mexican drug money, Iranian terrorist money, and even suspicious Russian money to enter the U.S. and gain access to U.S. dollar liquidity over the last couple of years.

www.forbes.com...

Michael A. Braun, the former intelligence chief for the DEA, testified this week at a hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee that "collaboration between Latin American drug cartels and groups such as Iran's Quds Force and the Islamic terror group Hezbollah is growing 'far faster than most policymakers in Washington, D.C., choose to admit'" as reported by Guy Taylor for The Washington Times.

www.freerepublic.com...

xican drug cartels are suspected of smuggling terrorists and explosives across the border into the United States, according to a report by the U.S. Army’s Asymmetrical Warfare Group (awg). The 350-strong “special mission unit” that works to “identify critical threats and enemy and friendly vulnerabilities through global firsthand observations,” according to the Army, compiled a report on a secret intelligence mission conducted along the southern U.S. border during February and March, releasing a “cleansed” version to civilian law enforcement, which was viewed by Newsmax.

www.thetrumpet.com...

Someone is lying indeed, but Clinton in this case?

Nope see quite a few in this thread who are.

reply to post by jam321


The US are in no hurry to stop mexico , because mexico allows for large amounts of drugs to come through the US border from south america , particularly from Nicaragua , Bolivia and Columbia. These drugs are then traded for Guns and Ammo from the US , the guns and ammo keep the cartels in a power struggle against each other and the mexican government , making mexico a prime target in the near future for "humanitarian aid"
all the while the drugs are sold to dealers in the US and the money is used to fund black budget ops and laundered through wall street. The drugs hit the streets of the US and destabalise communities and keep people under control and out of the way for the government. The US are using their own form of "narco terror" to destabalise communities in the US , specifically LA if you look at Crack coc aine and its surge in the 1980's which came directly from drug sales in Nicaragua , freeway rick ross , stated that he had made deals with individuals working for the alphabet agencies of the US government. It just so happened at this time those same agencies were heavily involved in the overthrow of Nicaragua.

If you also look at the opium flow from Afghanistan and its production increase since the US led invasion after 9/11 , now the opium moves freely from Afghan into Khazakstan and on into Siberia , where the opium is being used in narco terrorism to destabalise Russia . Which is someone elses problem. Of course the US is doing it to their own to fund itself and also to impose harsher punishment on criminals in the US and to restrict the freedoms of US citizens in the systematic abuse of the US since 1980

To add once the world sees that the cartels have enough power and are pushing the mexican government , the US will have to step in with the military who are far more advanced and powerful than the cartels and in a bid of humanitarian aid they will over throw the cartels and put in power a pupper regime friendly to US foreign policy !
surprised ? I didnt think so !