Originally posted by GAOTU789
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
So you want me to hold your hand through the report.
Start with the index and go from there mate. I gave you the information you asked for, you can read it or not but I am not going to spoon feed it to
I set my alarm early just so I could thoroughly go through the report and I found nothing comparable to the evidence you speak of, so yes. I am going
to ask you to hold my hand and spoon feed me Super Moderator Gaotu789,
It is your responsibility as the presenter of evidence to actually provide the evidence, any clown can post a link and say..."here is the proof".
Here watch me do it too.Here is a link, go through it, it is proof of what I speak of: wwww.google.com
Go through that link, it's all there
All jokes aside, there is no proof in that document and I challenge you to prove me wrong by showing me the proof you previously mentioned because I
can't find it.
I hate to mention previous interactions, but you did the same the last time we crossed paths. You linked me to a joint DHS/DARPA website and said it
was proof, but you were not able to actually point out which portion of your link was the evidence of which you speak of.
Trust me when I say that I am not trying to be a smart ass but if you are going to present something as proof you are going to have to do much better
than posting a link and telling me to read through it. So, please and thank you in advance, once again, where is the proof?
As other members mentioned that link is full of US propaganda, none of it can be considered proof, and even the circumstantial evidence is laughable
It would be the same as me referring you to the PRESS TV archives and telling you that is the proof you are looking for. Regrettably, PRESS TV is much
more truthful than that document you linked me to.
I beg of you sir, please provide me a portion of that document that can be considered proof.
edit on 12/11/2012 by Corruption Exposed because:
(no reason given)