It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In physics, a quantum (plural: quanta) is the minimum amount of any physical entity involved in an interaction. Behind this, one finds the fundamental notion that a physical property may be "quantized," referred to as "the hypothesis of quantization".[1] This means that the magnitude can take on only certain discrete values. There is a related term of quantum number. An example of an entity that is quantized is the energy transfer of elementary particles of matter (called fermions) and of photons and other bosons.
Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by NorEaster
Dear NorEaster,
On it's simplest level, the manner in which things act on a sub-atomic level violates rules of physics that we rely on in the "real world". In order to find answers we have created the Large Hadron Collider. 10,000 scientists worked on the LHC, not a few nuts. People like Dr. Michio Kaku are trying to understand these things that you might consider crazy; but, as far as we currently know, quantum entanglement and other such odd things can be regularly observed. We really cannot just ignore it because it does not fit in with how we would like to believe the world is.
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by NorEaster
Neils Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Wolfgang Pauli, Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, Louis de Broglie, Paul Dirac, Kurt Gödel & Max Planck.
These all generated ideas that increasingly moved further and further from the 'sensible logic' of the Newtonian world.
There were, of course, many others, too.
There were (and are) also many who misunderstood and tried to apply 'magical thinking' to quantum physics or vice versa.
edit on 9/12/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)
but then most of those names belong to guys who should've dated at some point in their lives. At least gotten out for a drink now and then
Quantum mysticism is a term that has been used to refer to a set of metaphysical beliefs and associated practices that seek to relate consciousness, intelligence, or mystical world-views to the ideas of quantum mechanics and its interpretations.[1][2][3][4][5][6] The term originally emerged from the founders of quantum theory in the early twentieth century as they debated the interpretations and implications of their nascent theories, which would later evolve into quantum mechanics, and later after World War II, with publications such as Schrödinger's and Eugene Wigner’s 1961 paper.[2][7] The essential qualities of early quantum theory, and the ontological questions that emerged from it, made a distinction between philosophical and scientific discussion difficult as quantum theory developed into a strong scientific theory.[citation needed] Quantum Mysticism is popularly considered pseudoscience.[8][9][10] Many of the leading Quantum physicists did however give mystical interpretations to their findings.
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by NorEaster
Neils Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Wolfgang Pauli, Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, Louis de Broglie, Paul Dirac, Kurt Gödel & Max Planck.
These all generated ideas that increasingly moved further and further from the 'sensible logic' of the Newtonian world.
There were, of course, many others, too.
There were (and are) also many who misunderstood and tried to apply 'magical thinking' to quantum physics or vice versa.
edit on 9/12/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)
Personally, I think Schrodinger should've been beaten to death with his dead cat, but then most of those names belong to guys who should've dated at some point in their lives. At least gotten out for a drink now and then. That "Incompleteness Theorem" is raw horsesh*t. Just downright embarrassing drivel.
But, I digress....
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Quantum mysticism is a term that has been used to refer to a set of metaphysical beliefs and associated practices that seek to relate consciousness, intelligence, or mystical world-views to the ideas of quantum mechanics and its interpretations.[1][2][3][4][5][6] The term originally emerged from the founders of quantum theory in the early twentieth century as they debated the interpretations and implications of their nascent theories, which would later evolve into quantum mechanics, and later after World War II, with publications such as Schrödinger's and Eugene Wigner’s 1961 paper.[2][7] The essential qualities of early quantum theory, and the ontological questions that emerged from it, made a distinction between philosophical and scientific discussion difficult as quantum theory developed into a strong scientific theory.[citation needed] Quantum Mysticism is popularly considered pseudoscience.[8][9][10] Many of the leading Quantum physicists did however give mystical interpretations to their findings.
Wikipedia
Mysticism has subverted philosophy long ago, and thus it moves through all sciences. I've noticed, like all philosophy, 'quantum mystics' follow their speculations wherever they will take them, but unlike science or mathematics, doesn't stop at contradictions, paradoxes and other logical dead-ends. Instead of discovering a goal, they've conceived of the goal already, and contrive a way to reach it. Deductive vs. inductive reasoning seems to be the cause.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by NorEaster
but then most of those names belong to guys who should've dated at some point in their lives. At least gotten out for a drink now and then
Are you just going to complain about how they lived their lives, or get down to actually explaining why quantum whatever shouldn't be explored regarding extranatural phenomena?
And I say extranatural because it isn't beyond nature, it's just beyond the nature we've familiarized ourselves with. And by familiarized, I mean poked with sharp sticks under a bright light.
Originally posted by chr0naut
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by NorEaster
Neils Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Wolfgang Pauli, Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, Louis de Broglie, Paul Dirac, Kurt Gödel & Max Planck.
These all generated ideas that increasingly moved further and further from the 'sensible logic' of the Newtonian world.
There were, of course, many others, too.
There were (and are) also many who misunderstood and tried to apply 'magical thinking' to quantum physics or vice versa.
edit on 9/12/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)
Personally, I think Schrodinger should've been beaten to death with his dead cat, but then most of those names belong to guys who should've dated at some point in their lives. At least gotten out for a drink now and then. That "Incompleteness Theorem" is raw horsesh*t. Just downright embarrassing drivel.
But, I digress....
You could also blame the Rand Corporation, I do.
edit on 9/12/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rival
I agree with the premise of your OP. There have been some 'quantum leaps' made in hypothesis
that seem pretty far out there. But these guys are all trying to make a name for themselves, get a
paper published and have a college building named after them.
The 'Occam's Razor' approach to hypothesis is for lames. Big thinkers have BIG ideas, and showing off
is not outside the norm. Since it is all uncharted territory, the explorers are all trying to plant their
flag first....
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Quantum mechanics seems to be an incorrect premise as soon as we attempt to view it through such a limited viewport and as separate, as if torn, from what it is a constituent of.
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Quantum mechanics seems to be an incorrect premise as soon as we attempt to view it through such a limited viewport and as separate, as if torn, from what it is a constituent of.
You would think that this very fundamental truth would be much more of a central notion within the brilliant minds that end up defining - and redefining - what quantum mechanics is, isn't, can be, and can't possibly be.