It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by luciddream
Abiogenesis is not going to cut it . Please give the link to the RNA developing under natural circumstances . DNA is a very complicated strand with many millions of parts . The single celled Amoeba has a DNA Structure more complicated than the human cell from what I read .
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Zcustosmorum
You know this for certain ! And then when they hit the Earth and cause what wouldbe a life extinguishing event life starts ? Not likely !
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Zcustosmorum
You know this for certain ! And then when they hit the Earth and cause what wouldbe a life extinguishing event life starts ? Not likely !
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Barcs
There is no direct evidence of anything evolving . Similarity in species that died off does not prove evolution . And what did they evolve from ? How did that species get here on earth . How did DNA occur here on earth in a living cell . The building block of life .
Originally posted by Barcs
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Barcs
There is no direct evidence of anything evolving . Similarity in species that died off does not prove evolution . And what did they evolve from ? How did that species get here on earth . How did DNA occur here on earth in a living cell . The building block of life .
No direct evidence of anything evolving? That completely 100% false. Boy you sure sound like a scientist or somebody who spends a lot of time researching scientific experiments.
www.talkorigins.org...
www.talkorigins.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
arstechnica.com...
www.wired.com...
en.wikipedia.org...
Start with that. If you have an issue with something there, cite it and explain why it's false and what evidence you have to back it up. STOP THE ATTACK ON SCIENCE!edit on 10-12-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SimonPeter
Remember DNA ! It doesn't grow on trees or rocks . Even scientist of today will not argue spontaneous life . DNA does not occur randomly nor does the living cell occur randomly . Now they must also exist together . Then the cell has to survive , feed , grow , have offspring , continue to exist and the same with their offspring . What are the chances ? Not likely without an extinction . What will it feed on ? Even old Carl Sagan could not project how this could be so he would throw a BILLION years in to give it possibility .reply to post by KrzYma
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by luciddream
Abiogenesis is not going to cut it . Please give the link to the RNA developing under natural circumstances . DNA is a very complicated strand with many millions of parts . The single celled Amoeba has a DNA Structure more complicated than the human cell from what I read .
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Zcustosmorum
You mean that thing that gets a thousand degrees when it enters the Atmosphere or a commet that also gets very hot and likely explodes in our atmosphere ?
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Zcustosmorum
You know this for certain ! And then when they hit the Earth and cause what wouldbe a life extinguishing event life starts ? Not likely !
Originally posted by KrzYma
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Zcustosmorum
You mean that thing that gets a thousand degrees when it enters the Atmosphere or a commet that also gets very hot and likely explodes in our atmosphere ?
do you have any knowledge of thermodynamics? I see you DON"T
no, I'm not going to explain this
reply to post by KrzYma
sounds like you put humans, feelings and yourself to a special position in this universe. btw. evolution is NOT survival of the fittest rather than quality of being accommodative
Originally posted by KrzYma
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Zcustosmorum
You know this for certain ! And then when they hit the Earth and cause what wouldbe a life extinguishing event life starts ? Not likely !
you really don't understand anything and your science is based on Discovery Channel I think...
look, even if a comet or asteroid hits the earth, and it cares some cells with it, not all of them will "die"!
if any complex life already exists on this planet, they may get extinguished, the environment changes because of this impact, but life will carry on, not exactly the same lifeforms but others.
Start with accepting the fact that all the iron in your blood comes from an exploded star, try to understand how universe works, no God said there will be iron, nuclear reactions did!
All you are doing is explaining all that you don't understand/know as God's power I just tell you physics, chemistry space and time is all you need...
Originally posted by bowtomonkey
reply to post by KrzYma
All you are doing is explaining all that you don't understand/know as God's power I just tell you physics, chemistry space and time is all you need...
Yes but you still can't explain "life". You never ever shall, especially while you lack any semblance of a scientifically provable concept of "who and what you are".
All you seem to be capable of is misdiagnosing religion and bringing up past mistakes from "scientists' who used religious dogma.
"Science" doesn't change much unfortunately.
Originally posted by randomname
adapting to an environment makes logical sense. God gave them that ability so they can survive and not go extinct.
it gets colder, an animal grows a thicker coat. it gets warmer, it sheds.
but even then, there's still evidence that every animal on earth was placed in its current location or face death.
for, example, you can't put a hippo in the arctic tundra. it'll die. and you can keep putting hippos in the arctic for the next billion years and the result will be the same. they'll die.
but according to evolutionists, they should grow shiny fur coats.
transforming from an ape into a human being is not adapting. it's changing species.
evolutionist conveniently ignore the crocodile paradox. according to them they claim they are 250 million years old and have remained unchanged.
then why aren't they warping around the universe and doing advanced mathematics.
instead they live in swamps, scavenging on rotten meat and getting killed by toothless hillbillies every week on the discovery channel.
did evolution take a holiday when it was the crocodiles turn. or did the crocodile say, you know what, i like to wallow in methane gas and rotten vegetables.
Originally posted by dusty1
reply to post by NavyDoc
I don't follow your point. What I am saying is that it is not against the Bible to think that God created and used a natural law such as evolution to get to humankind. God uses physics to keep the planets in orbit, yes?
The bible says that God created animals according to their kind.
If He didn't do that, then what the bible says is false.
Saying we are all just flukes, like the product of a billion monkeys and a billion typewriters is too idiotic for me, lol. How about, on their way to writing a classic novel they went through millions of stages of development, just as we already know everything to be ... and use that in your theory of evolution.