It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by begoodbees
I thing you are confusing education and indoctrination. If there were anything but circumstantial evidence out there to support evolution than there would be no debate. I don't need educating. The purpose of me responses and questions are to show you and whoever else cares that spontaneous evolution from its core is a flawed theory at best.
A cell evolved to protect itself from other cells that evolved.
That is a circular argument. Some how these little cells were able to think and band together like little militias on against the other. Now tell me if you hadn't been indoctrinated your whole life you would really believe that.
The whole theory of evolution is circular, we evolve to survive to evolve to survive. What is the point? I know it is hard to cast out a lifetime of indoctrination I used to be a christian.
Also an ignorant theist I believe is a name and an insult.
reply to post by KrzYma
now think about our technological explosion over the last 200 years. it all began with inventing of the electricity.. the first 50 years it was practically useless, and here we are now.
Originally posted by begoodbees
reply to post by Glass
I know the theory. The problem is it does not make any sense and there is no real evidence to back it up. You are just as bad as the religious fanatics who will not cast away false beliefs and customs even if you prove to them from their own book that they are wrong.
"Because that's how DNA works is not an answer to the question." DNA is very complex and it came from where. Did it evolve on its own? DNA is not alive so how could it evolve on its own? A cell cant reproduce without DNA so it is a very flawed theory at best. The chicken and the egg.
Originally posted by Glass
Originally posted by begoodbees
I thing you are confusing education and indoctrination. If there were anything but circumstantial evidence out there to support evolution than there would be no debate. I don't need educating. The purpose of me responses and questions are to show you and whoever else cares that spontaneous evolution from its core is a flawed theory at best.
A flawed theory, perhaps, but I have yet to see a better theory. Spontaneous evolution versus spontaneous creation. One has evidence, the other is based solely on imagination and an old book of philosophy.
A cell evolved to protect itself from other cells that evolved.
Cells evolve. Some cells gain advantages over others, the others adapt.
That is a circular argument. Some how these little cells were able to think and band together like little militias on against the other. Now tell me if you hadn't been indoctrinated your whole life you would really believe that.
You're completely ignoring what I've already stated. The cells don't have to think for evolution to take place. At some point, cells stuck together rather than acting as seperate entities, this was a benefit to their survival, so they continued to do so.
The whole theory of evolution is circular, we evolve to survive to evolve to survive. What is the point? I know it is hard to cast out a lifetime of indoctrination I used to be a christian.
What is the point? That's a whole different question that I don't think evolution is equipped to answer. My opinion is that the system is designed to expand and express different possibilities, leading to new creations. It is a creative process after all.
Also an ignorant theist I believe is a name and an insult.
I didn't specifically call you an ignorant theist, but feel free to be offended by your own ignorance.
You suggest that I should abandon what I understand because its not complete...such wilful ignorance is not in my nature.
Originally posted by Glass
reply to post by begoodbees
You have no idea how open or closed my mind is, nor can I say whether or not my mind is more open than yours, however you've displayed a great deal of closed mindedness when it comes to the topic of evolution.
I consider myself an open minded person. My mind is open to new possibilities, should they present themselves. I question my own beliefs, when given good reason to question them. You haven't provided good reason for me to abandon the theory of evolution. You haven't provided an alternative explanation. You haven't provided a detailed, compelling argument.
You're also becoming increasingly difficult to talk to with your allegations that I'm some sort of closed minded fanatic. But then, you may be speaking to your own reflection within the Glass.
Have a good night.
Originally posted by dusty1
reply to post by NavyDoc
I don't follow your point. What I am saying is that it is not against the Bible to think that God created and used a natural law such as evolution to get to humankind. God uses physics to keep the planets in orbit, yes?
The bible says that God created animals according to their kind.
If He didn't do that, then what the bible says is false.
There would be room for pre programmed variations within a kind.
As far as evolution.
If we are talking the primordial soup to man theory, that would be contrary to the bible.
If we are talking Thomas Hunt Morgan's fruit fly experiment relating to genetics, and you want to call that evolution, well, it is observed. You can choose to call it evolution, but the fruit fly remains in its "kind" and the bible does not conflict with the observation.
Originally posted by randomname
but even then, there's still evidence that every animal on earth was placed in its current location or face death.
for, example, you can't put a hippo in the arctic tundra. it'll die. and you can keep putting hippos in the arctic for the next billion years and the result will be the same. they'll die.
transforming from an ape into a human being is not adapting. it's changing species.
evolutionist conveniently ignore the crocodile paradox. according to them they claim they are 250 million years old and have remained unchanged.
Originally posted by shadowreborn89
could say the same.. first there no proof of evolution it itself is also a Theory not a fact.. more reason in creationism than evolutionismedit on 9-12-2012 by shadowreborn89 because: (no reason given)
Gravity explains the way apples fall from a tree