Originally posted by micmerci


Sorry, but it absolutely is legal. Ex Merchant Marine and Navy and I know it goes on. And I don't need no link to prove what I have seen with my own eyes.

Epic. "...I don't need no link to prove..."

Apparently...one don't need no kinda proper grammer-talk no way at all neither.

He was in the navy , he has "seen" things , he needs no proof!

Epic. "...I don't need no link to prove..."

Apparently...one don't need no kinda proper grammer-talk no way at all neither.

That was intentional, to indicate attitude in my writing. Along the lines of the intentional sarcasm in your response. Or should I devote a post to the grammatical corrections necessary in your response? Would that qualify me as a Grammar Nazi?

Do not try to disqualify my rebuttal to your poor scientific method by pointing out supposed grammatical errors. It is silly and unbecoming.

Just to avoid any further confusion, I will be certain to post only in the Queen's English henceforth.

Originally posted by micmerci

Epic. "...I don't need no link to prove..."

Apparently...one don't need no kinda proper grammer-talk no way at all neither.

That was intentional, to indicate attitude in my writing. Along the lines of the intentional sarcasm in your response. Or should I devote a post to the grammatical corrections necessary in your response? Would that qualify me as a Grammar Nazi?

Do not try to disqualify my rebuttal to your poor scientific method by pointing out supposed grammatical errors. It is silly and unbecoming.

Just to avoid any further confusion, I will be certain to post only in the Queen's English henceforth.

But can you proof how poor the scientific method is and invalidate those numbers?

Originally posted by milominderbinder
I was using the term "european style socialism" sarcastically and ironically.

Hehe OK mate I understand ya.

Yeah the Dutch East India Company had a monopoly, by STATE sanction, on exploiting people and resources in Asia. If people only read some history of companies like this they would realise that capitalism and the state are one and the same (for those who think capitalism can be stateless).

While i don't disagree that one can look at the real statistics and draw
a corollary to it actually being correct that abstinence and the religious
way of dealing with sexuality is far less effective than more open
and accepting views which teach responsibility and that sexuality
is a natural and perfectly normal thing for teens to explore, this
data is so far only a correlation, more study is still needed before
one could say with certainty.

Also statistics are a tough one for people to accept as they are
used improperly time and again, hence why everyone is skeptical
of their use now days. while it is a useful field and if used properly
does very well in indicating things, people will not accept that they
are harming their children based on those alone.

This really does come down to people being honest about all this,
to lie about sexuality is as bad if not worse than not even explaining
it which is the rout my christian parents went, my father tried to
wait until i was 18 to even have a discussion about it and like most
teenagers i had already experienced it for myself, and that's what
this all comes down to, kids are human beings as well, as much
as we want to believe we actually have some kind of control over them,
we do not, they will do these things, whether you want to believe that
is of no consequence, they will do them, hence why being prudent
and not burying your head in the sand is the proper way to deal with it.

It all really comes down to this issue where in religions in the US think
abstinence is actually a reality when whats really going on is teenagers
who have no idea or understanding about what they are doing simply
experimenting with their sexuality and not knowing how to protect
themselves because of abstinence, religions simply think that kids
will say no all the time, most of us having been teenagers know very
well that those feelings aren't so easy to just ignore. that's why
we must teach our children to be responsible and not just to
pretend this isn't actually a problem in the real world.

i guess it comes down to abstinence being a complete failure, it does
not often accomplish what it is meant to and very very often gets you
exactly the opposite of what it was intended to do, oh and sex ed in
a religious school is pathetic, completely useless class, i had it and
did not learn a single thing about sexuality, i learned about reproduction
which should have very well been in biology. sexuality is real, whether or
not you find it shameful is another problem all together, but please
don't make you kids ashamed of their sexuality, it took me a very
long time to be comfortable with my sexuality because of my conservative
upbringing.

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by micmerci

Epic. "...I don't need no link to prove..."

Apparently...one don't need no kinda proper grammer-talk no way at all neither.

That was intentional, to indicate attitude in my writing. Along the lines of the intentional sarcasm in your response. Or should I devote a post to the grammatical corrections necessary in your response? Would that qualify me as a Grammar Nazi?

Do not try to disqualify my rebuttal to your poor scientific method by pointing out supposed grammatical errors. It is silly and unbecoming.

Just to avoid any further confusion, I will be certain to post only in the Queen's English henceforth.

But can you proof how poor the scientific method is and invalidate those numbers?

YES, I can!! It is called reading the ENTIRE report and then evaluating ALL the data. Step two involves going into the interpretation of the data without a bias. There are states that are typically very liberal and teach exhaustive sex education in school that are at the top of the teenage abortion chart. I feel like I am beating a dead horse or talking to a wall, but religion, at best, is only ONE of MANY determining factors in these results.

Originally posted by bloodreviara
i guess it comes down to abstinence being a complete failure, it does
not often accomplish what it is meant to and very very often gets you
exactly the opposite of what it was intended to do, oh and sex ed in
a religious school is pathetic, completely useless class, i had it and
did not learn a single thing about sexuality, i learned about reproduction
which should have very well been in biology. sexuality is real, whether or
not you find it shameful is another problem all together, but please
don't make you kids ashamed of their sexuality, it took me a very
long time to be comfortable with my sexuality because of my conservative
upbringing.

And this is exactly the problem that is being pointed out. But apparently "concerned" parents here in the U.S do not want to hear about it and rather go on having as many children have sex, pregnancies and abortions as they are having now.

Originally posted by micmerci

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by micmerci

Epic. "...I don't need no link to prove..."

Apparently...one don't need no kinda proper grammer-talk no way at all neither.

That was intentional, to indicate attitude in my writing. Along the lines of the intentional sarcasm in your response. Or should I devote a post to the grammatical corrections necessary in your response? Would that qualify me as a Grammar Nazi?

Do not try to disqualify my rebuttal to your poor scientific method by pointing out supposed grammatical errors. It is silly and unbecoming.

Just to avoid any further confusion, I will be certain to post only in the Queen's English henceforth.

But can you proof how poor the scientific method is and invalidate those numbers?

YES, I can!! It is called reading the ENTIRE report and then evaluating ALL the data. Step two involves going into the interpretation of the data without a bias. There are states that are typically very liberal and teach exhaustive sex education in school that are at the top of the teenage abortion chart. I feel like I am beating a dead horse or talking to a wall, but religion, at best, is only ONE of MANY determining factors in these results.

The results are not about religion , religion is a factor because of its manners in the approach but still just 1 factor in the argument and a valid one as a whole i am sorry to say. But even outside of religion the whole of the U.S is afraid of talking and educating and acting more openly about sex. Even if it helps fight the problems at hand (like baby killing)


But alas, after you tried to claim that child prostitution is legal over there i cannot take anything you say seriously over anymore


.