It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
but having the freedom to text and drive like a moron is more important, right ?
Originally posted by Rezlooper
So, if it began recording when the airbag went off, how do they determine the cause? How do they know if I swerved to miss the beloved squirrel or I just plain missed a curve because I was texting? Not understanding this yet. Sure, someone else posted it records when something abnormal happens, but if I drove straight off a curve, how would it know that was abnormal?
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
but having the freedom to text and drive like a moron is more important, right ?
Yeah, actually, it is.
Originally posted by Rezlooper
reply to post by PsykoOps
How does it just record the seconds before a crash? Did it know you were going to crash?
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by Rezlooper
So, if it began recording when the airbag went off, how do they determine the cause? How do they know if I swerved to miss the beloved squirrel or I just plain missed a curve because I was texting? Not understanding this yet. Sure, someone else posted it records when something abnormal happens, but if I drove straight off a curve, how would it know that was abnormal?
Nope, that's not what they do. They stop recording after a crash. Untill it stops the device records on a continous loop. It overrides the older data continously.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
but having the freedom to text and drive like a moron is more important, right ?
Yeah, actually, it is.
Actually you lost that "right" the moment you use a road other people use too.edit on 9/12/2012 by PsykoOps because: add
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Actually you lost that "right" the moment you use a road other people use too.
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Actually you lost that "right" the moment you use a road other people use too.
Monitoring your travel habits without consent is a violation of the 4th Amendment. Restricting that right with onerous legislation, taxation and fees is a violation of a preson's right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. However, people have been conditioned one bite at a time to cede these rights and accept restrictions on these freedoms "for the sake of the children" and the "good of society".
Originally posted by jrod
This would be true if the majority of drivers in the US did not already have an on board GPS. Also insurance companies are offering some sort of device to monitor one's driving habits, mostly accelerating and breaking, if the computer likes the way a person drives then the insurance rates go down. The technology is already here and the population is paying to use it.
Originally posted by beezzer
It's for the "Mileage Tax".
The Obama administration wants to spend $556 billion over the next six years on transportation projects, but they may have to get creative to pay for them. One "practical option" could be taxing drivers based on their mileage, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is reporting.
Linky
Just another way to tax us.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
...But to force EVERYONE to use technology that allows the government to pinpoint their exact location at any time is wrong.
Those who willingly give up freedom for safety deserve neither. You are one of those who are willing, aint ya? I'm not.
Originally posted by Golf66
Monitoring your travel habits without consent is a violation of the 4th Amendment. Restricting that right with onerous legislation, taxation and fees is a violation of a preson's right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. However, people have been conditioned one bite at a time to cede these rights and accept restrictions on these freedoms "for the sake of the children" and the "good of society".
Originally posted by jrod
The government also requires things like seat belts, working lights, a horn, in some place emissions inspections, insurance, a driver's license, ect for our own safety. If you want to drive on the roads you have to be the governments rules, no getting around it. Its not that I think every car should have a black box, its more that that line has been crossed long ago and a black box isn't much of a requirement.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
That's just pure hyperbole. The data in black boxes is accessed only in a crash investigation or in an investigation to safety incidents such as the toyota accelaration scare.
Originally posted by Golf66
Monitoring your travel habits without consent is a violation of the 4th Amendment. Restricting that right with onerous legislation, taxation and fees is a violation of a person’s right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. However, people have been conditioned one bite at a time to cede these rights and accept restrictions on these freedoms "for the sake of the children" and the "good of society".
Originally posted by PsykoOps
More bs. from the same book. They don't access the data untill it's needed.
You people and your "rights".
Originally posted by PsykoOps
How do you suppose they access that data then? Magically teleport it to their evil reptilian super computers? Baa-baa