It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Druscilla
I say this time and again ...
There
is
NO
Nibiru.
(video) about that Nibiru thing ...
Spoiler:
The Sumerian name for JUPITER was ....
Nibiru.
Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by LiveEquation
Don't bother.. Its not there and you would only be wasting your time searching for it.
Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by LiveEquation
Don't bother.. Its not there and you would only be wasting your time searching for it.
Originally posted by SyntheticPerception
reply to post by LiveEquation
I think this is a very important angle to investigate this matter.
Alternative view for "object incoming" theories: Movement in another dimension,
It would make sense of certain anomalies measured "possibly" but not seen.
Originally posted by LiveEquation
Originally posted by Druscilla
I say this time and again ...
There
is
NO
Nibiru.
(video) about that Nibiru thing ...
Spoiler:
The Sumerian name for JUPITER was ....
Nibiru.
I think you misunderstand the purpose of this thread. The thread doesn't ask you to state your beliefs here. This thread is about taking images of the sky and looking for anomalies that you can try to explain. Other than that, no other input about what you believe is required.
Peace
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Originally posted by Ear-Responsible
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Ear-Responsible
You said "many respected astronomers believe in its theoretical existence." Got some others to add to the list? It takes a lot more than two to make "many".
edit on 12/9/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
How about Rodney Gomes at the National Observatory of Brazil in Rio de Janeiro? Or Johann Gottfried Galle? Or Thomas John Hussey? How about Alexis Bouvard? Peter Andreas Hansen? Shall I continue?edit on 9-12-2012 by Ear-Responsible because: (no reason given)
Yes actually, you'll need to go on, because first, you used the present tense for "believe" and 4 of the 5 astronomers you cited are dead, and actually LONG dead astronomers that worked the field of astronomy before Pluto was even discovered and when Neptune's correct mass was not known.
Johann Gottfried Galle, 1812 - 1910
Thomas John Hussey, 1792 - 1854
Alexis Bouvard, 1767 - 1843
Peter Andreas Hansen, 1795 - 1874
Alexis Bouvard wasn't looking for Nibiru or a companion to the sun. He was looking for a planet beyond Uranus based upon his observations of the planet. 3 years after his death, in 1846, using his observational data, Neptune was discovered.
Thomas Hussey was looking for Neptune. Johann Gottfried Galle was also looking for Neptune.
Peter Hansen had worked out research into the mutual perturbations of Jupiter and Saturn prior to 1830 who's data again, helped discovered Neptune.
Rodney Gomes is the only currently alive astronomer that you listed, and no, he doesn't believe in "Nibiru" as described by Stitchin or anyone else.
What he did was work out computer models that might help find another planet beyond the Kuiper Belt that might be affecting the orbits of Kuiper Belt objects, but that anything out there, will be staying out there.
So yes, you do need to go on, but based upon what you presented, what you REALLY need to do is some reading and research before you post again since you failed to do either of those in the first place.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Druscilla
In regards to that; does anybody know Jupiter's relative position to Earth?
Originally posted by Ear-Responsible
I never said they were searching for anything or that they "believed" in "Nibiru"? Your entire post is full of fail and yet you still got stars.. gotta love the ATS crowd, speaking in certainties about things that are not. Stop putting words in my mouth. I proved my point, and that was there are plenty of astronomers who do not completely discount the POSSIBILITY of a rogue planet. Try again.
Oh the irony packed in that last statement in your postedit on 9-12-2012 by Ear-Responsible because: (no reason given)
Also, there is plenty of evidence to suggest a "Nibiru" type planet is on an eliptical orbit.. possibly a brown dwarf as most systems are typically binary though some fail to get off. So I'm still not seeing your point. I think what you meant to say is.. yes the possibility of its existence is likely but you don't have to worry about it because we would see it coming long before it got here.. especially if it is the size described(brown dwarf).
Lol @ the amount of snarkyness you forced into that post, just what we need here at ATS. You are giving too much credit to our astronomers, the solar system is a vast place.. you're basically speaking with a certainty that they can easily find a needle in a billion hay stacks. Be reasonable.
I agree. And for the record I never said it existed or didn't, just that it is possible and many respected astronomers believe in its theoretical existence.
Right. I'm sure they are the only two on the planet with decent credentials that entertain the idea.. get lost
Originally posted by Ear-Responsible
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Ear-Responsible
You said "many respected astronomers believe in its theoretical existence." Got some others to add to the list? It takes a lot more than two to make "many".
edit on 12/9/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
How about Rodney Gomes at the National Observatory of Brazil in Rio de Janeiro? Or Johann Gottfried Galle? Or Thomas John Hussey? How about Alexis Bouvard? Peter Andreas Hansen? Shall I continue?edit on 9-12-2012 by Ear-Responsible because: (no reason given)