Originally posted by Ear-Responsible
I never said they were searching for anything or that they "believed" in "Nibiru"? Your entire post is full of fail and yet you still got stars..
gotta love the ATS crowd, speaking in certainties about things that are not. Stop putting words in my mouth. I proved my point, and that was there are
plenty of astronomers who do not completely discount the POSSIBILITY of a rogue planet. Try again.
Oh the irony packed in that last statement in your post 
edit on 9-12-2012 by Ear-Responsible because: (no reason given)
I'm afraid you did. You specifically said that, so I'm not putting any words in your mouth at all (nice attitude by the way, you have it again in
other posts listed here).
Post one,
here you said:
Also, there is plenty of evidence to suggest a "Nibiru" type planet is on an eliptical orbit.. possibly a brown dwarf as most systems are typically
binary though some fail to get off. So I'm still not seeing your point. I think what you meant to say is.. yes the possibility of its existence is
likely but you don't have to worry about it because we would see it coming long before it got here.. especially if it is the size described(brown
dwarf).
You said that there was plenty of evidence for it.
Then in this post
here, you turn around and discredit astronomers with
this statement:
Lol @ the amount of snarkyness you forced into that post, just what we need here at ATS. You are giving too much credit to our astronomers, the solar
system is a vast place.. you're basically speaking with a certainty that they can easily find a needle in a billion hay stacks. Be reasonable.
Then you completely contradict yourself (and still have not show the "plenty of evidence" yet), in this post
here when you said:
I agree. And for the record I never said it existed or didn't, just that it is possible and many respected astronomers believe in its theoretical
existence.
At which point Phage pointed out the only modern day astronomers that really believe there is something out past the Kuiper Belt are John Matese and
Daniel Whitmire
At which point you said in this post
here:
Right. I'm sure they are the only two on the planet with decent credentials that entertain the idea.. get lost
Rather rude on your part IMHO.
Then Phage asked you who else there was, and in this post
here you gave
this reply:
Originally posted by Ear-Responsible
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Ear-Responsible
You said "many respected astronomers believe in its theoretical existence." Got some others to add to the list? It takes a lot more than two to make
"many".
edit on 12/9/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
How about Rodney Gomes at the National Observatory of Brazil in Rio de Janeiro? Or Johann Gottfried Galle? Or Thomas John Hussey? How about Alexis
Bouvard? Peter Andreas Hansen? Shall I continue?edit on 9-12-2012 by Ear-Responsible because: (no reason given)
So no, I'm afraid I have not put anything in your mouth. Your mouth has said it all on it's own. You've contradicted yourself, made a claim that there
is evidence (which you've failed to produced), then claimed that there are many astronomers out there that believe in a rogue planet out there,
however, even in that you were completely wrong.
Each astronomer you listed was looking for an orbital body. NOT a rogue planet. Even our 3 modern day astronomers, John Matese, Daniel Whitmire and
Gomes are not looking for a rogue planet, but an orbital body, who's orbit stays well outside the Kuiper Belt.
Now, I've been nothing but polite in my posts and responses with absolutely no attitude at all.
edit on 9-12-2012 by eriktheawful because: (no
reason given)
