It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the past 10 years, diagnoses of autism have increased from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 88 children: a 79% increase. Science says that an epidemic CANNOT be due to a developmental or genetic disorder; it can only be caused by a DISEASE process.
[/quote
A message from Dr. Michael J. Goldberg During my training in medical school and pediatrics during the 1970s, we were taught that there was no such thing as an epidemic of a genetic disorder, that there were not mysterious developmental disorders where a child develops normally for the first 1 ½ to 2 years and then regresses without a given reason or cause—like we are seeing with autism today. There also was no such thing as a “childhood disintegrative disorder.” We were taught that epidemics could only be the result of a disease process. As a physician, I am shocked that our medical and research world would overlook these simple facts and key medical / scientific logic and training. For the last twenty years, I have treated patients who were diagnosed with Autism, PDD, ADD, ADHD, and other related disorders by using the Goldberg Approach™, and as a result, many have dramatically improved or eventually have had symptoms disappear. Because it is incorrectly assumed that the basis for autism is developmental, parents are missing out on a vital component of treatment for their children. We must recognize that these children have multiple “autistic” symptoms, but it is time to focus on and treat the real underlying disease they have.
edit on 8-12-2012 by buddha because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
While I dont doubt that outside factors play a part in autism, the biggest factor in the rise in cases is the simplest factor-diagnosis. Its not that there are so many more cases (although I do agree that the number is on the rise), its mostly just that more and more are getting diagnosed. 15 years ago the majority of cases went undiagnosed.
Originally posted by buddha
I can see you swallow the propaganda they feed you.
did you know before they did research, Nothing happen at all.
Originally posted by buddha
I can see you swallow the propaganda they feed you.
did you know before they did research, Nothing happen at all.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
While I dont doubt that outside factors play a part in autism, the biggest factor in the rise in cases is the simplest factor-diagnosis. Its not that there are so many more cases (although I do agree that the number is on the rise), its mostly just that more and more are getting diagnosed. 15 years ago the majority of cases went undiagnosed.
reply to post by captaintyinknots
No one knew what autism was 20 years ago. We can recognize it more clearly now, although we still have many kids that are on the spectrum but are not diagnosed. 99% of all cases went undiagnosed until very recently.
When the first cases of autism began to appear in the 1940s, researchers were puzzled by the high incidence of autistic children being born into well-educated families. Over 90 percent of the parents were high-school graduates. Nearly three-fourths of the fathers and one-half of the mothers had graduated from college. Many had professional careers. As a result, scientists unsuccessfully tried to link autism to genetic factors in the upper class populations.(5) Meanwhile, psychiatrists, unaware of the neurological basis of the illness, sought psychological explanations. The mother was often accused of not providing an emotionally secure home environment, and was presumed to be the cause of her afflicted child's ailment.(6,7)
The first cases of autism in the United States occurred at a time shortly after the pertussis vaccine became available. When the pertussis vaccine was initially introduced (during the late 1930s), only the rich and educated parents who sought the very best for their children, and who could afford a private doctor, were in a position to request the newest medical advancements. (Remember how researchers were puzzled by the high incidence of autistic children being born into well-educated and "upper class" families.) However, by the 1960s and 1970s parents all over the country, within every educational and income level, were seeking help for their autistic children. Socioeconomic disparities began to disappear during this period.
Today, autism is evenly distributed among all social classes and ethnic groups.(13) Once again this puzzled the researchers. Many simply concluded that earlier studies were flawed. But there is an explanation. Free vaccinations at public health clinics didn't yet exist in the 1940s and 1950s. Compulsory vaccination programs were still on the horizon. And as vaccine programs grew, parents from across the socioeconomic spectrum gained equal access to them. The growing number of children suffering from this new illness directly coincided with the growing popularity of the mandated vaccination programs during these same years. Autistic children were now being discovered within every kind of family, and in dreadfully greater numbers than ever before imagined
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
reply to post by captaintyinknots
No one knew what autism was 20 years ago. We can recognize it more clearly now, although we still have many kids that are on the spectrum but are not diagnosed. 99% of all cases went undiagnosed until very recently.
Saything that "No one knew" isn't exactly true.
When the first cases of autism began to appear in the 1940s, researchers were puzzled by the high incidence of autistic children being born into well-educated families. Over 90 percent of the parents were high-school graduates. Nearly three-fourths of the fathers and one-half of the mothers had graduated from college. Many had professional careers. As a result, scientists unsuccessfully tried to link autism to genetic factors in the upper class populations.(5) Meanwhile, psychiatrists, unaware of the neurological basis of the illness, sought psychological explanations. The mother was often accused of not providing an emotionally secure home environment, and was presumed to be the cause of her afflicted child's ailment.(6,7)
educate-yourself.org...
True autism is unmistakable. Most of these children weren't able to participate in normal education and were cloistered away in special schools, or at home. Autism was a heavy part of my abnormal psych classes back more than 20 years ago in college. The medical establishment definitely knew! 99% went undiagnosed?? Doubtful, unless one is talking about Asperger's.
Oddly enough:
The first cases of autism in the United States occurred at a time shortly after the pertussis vaccine became available. When the pertussis vaccine was initially introduced (during the late 1930s), only the rich and educated parents who sought the very best for their children, and who could afford a private doctor, were in a position to request the newest medical advancements. (Remember how researchers were puzzled by the high incidence of autistic children being born into well-educated and "upper class" families.) However, by the 1960s and 1970s parents all over the country, within every educational and income level, were seeking help for their autistic children. Socioeconomic disparities began to disappear during this period.
Today, autism is evenly distributed among all social classes and ethnic groups.(13) Once again this puzzled the researchers. Many simply concluded that earlier studies were flawed. But there is an explanation. Free vaccinations at public health clinics didn't yet exist in the 1940s and 1950s. Compulsory vaccination programs were still on the horizon. And as vaccine programs grew, parents from across the socioeconomic spectrum gained equal access to them. The growing number of children suffering from this new illness directly coincided with the growing popularity of the mandated vaccination programs during these same years. Autistic children were now being discovered within every kind of family, and in dreadfully greater numbers than ever before imagined
Ibid.
I also worked for years with that population. The greater number is not because "nobody knew what autism was 20 years ago", but perhaps that they are throwing Asperger's into the spectrum and the numbers are somewhat inflated.....however, it is important to realize that autism is a modern disorder, and is most definitely on the rise.
People speak of chelation therapy....I have never seen it work, and the chelating agents tend to leach out the good minerals and nutrients the child needs. We are speaking of a brain injury when we speak of autism. I believe there are some natural foods that may help (many autistic children have gluten intolerance and are food sensitive to many things we eat).
Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by buddha
Buddha, can I ask.
Why did you post this on a forum if you didn't want to hear a dissenting opinion? Someone disagrees with you, and you call him a fool. All the meanwhile you ramble on like an idiot.
Here's a crazy idea, go get some real education rather than some source on the internet.
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
reply to post by captaintyinknots
No one knew what autism was 20 years ago. We can recognize it more clearly now, although we still have many kids that are on the spectrum but are not diagnosed. 99% of all cases went undiagnosed until very recently.
Saything that "No one knew" isn't exactly true.
When the first cases of autism began to appear in the 1940s, researchers were puzzled by the high incidence of autistic children being born into well-educated families. Over 90 percent of the parents were high-school graduates. Nearly three-fourths of the fathers and one-half of the mothers had graduated from college. Many had professional careers. As a result, scientists unsuccessfully tried to link autism to genetic factors in the upper class populations.(5) Meanwhile, psychiatrists, unaware of the neurological basis of the illness, sought psychological explanations. The mother was often accused of not providing an emotionally secure home environment, and was presumed to be the cause of her afflicted child's ailment.(6,7)
educate-yourself.org...
True autism is unmistakable. Most of these children weren't able to participate in normal education and were cloistered away in special schools, or at home. Autism was a heavy part of my abnormal psych classes back more than 20 years ago in college. The medical establishment definitely knew! 99% went undiagnosed?? Doubtful, unless one is talking about Asperger's.
Oddly enough:
The first cases of autism in the United States occurred at a time shortly after the pertussis vaccine became available. When the pertussis vaccine was initially introduced (during the late 1930s), only the rich and educated parents who sought the very best for their children, and who could afford a private doctor, were in a position to request the newest medical advancements. (Remember how researchers were puzzled by the high incidence of autistic children being born into well-educated and "upper class" families.) However, by the 1960s and 1970s parents all over the country, within every educational and income level, were seeking help for their autistic children. Socioeconomic disparities began to disappear during this period.
Today, autism is evenly distributed among all social classes and ethnic groups.(13) Once again this puzzled the researchers. Many simply concluded that earlier studies were flawed. But there is an explanation. Free vaccinations at public health clinics didn't yet exist in the 1940s and 1950s. Compulsory vaccination programs were still on the horizon. And as vaccine programs grew, parents from across the socioeconomic spectrum gained equal access to them. The growing number of children suffering from this new illness directly coincided with the growing popularity of the mandated vaccination programs during these same years. Autistic children were now being discovered within every kind of family, and in dreadfully greater numbers than ever before imagined
Ibid.
I also worked for years with that population. The greater number is not because "nobody knew what autism was 20 years ago", but perhaps that they are throwing Asperger's into the spectrum and the numbers are somewhat inflated.....however, it is important to realize that autism is a modern disorder, and is most definitely on the rise.
People speak of chelation therapy....I have never seen it work, and the chelating agents tend to leach out the good minerals and nutrients the child needs. We are speaking of a brain injury when we speak of autism. I believe there are some natural foods that may help (many autistic children have gluten intolerance and are food sensitive to many things we eat).
In 1943 the well known child psychiatrist, Leo Kanner, announced his discovery of eleven cases of a new mental disorder. He noted that "the condition differs markedly and uniquely from anything reported so far..."(1) This condition soon became known as autism.