Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Photo of Nibiru? What do you think?

page: 3
24
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by JibbyJedi
 

No.
A full Moon rises and sets opposite the setting and rising Sun. That is another example of an internal reflection.




posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by JibbyJedi
 


That is NOT the Moon. You're just kidding, right?



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
Another thread on the same topic? No. Not Nibiru.
It is lens flare (more accurately, an internal reflection). Since the Sun has clouds across it, so does its reflection.



I think I like your Niburu pics better Phage.



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by JibbyJedi
 


That is NOT the Moon. You're just kidding, right?


In the full moon near the sun photo I posted, the source claims that is the fading full moon in the early morning hours. It's not my photo so I cant verify it personally.

I've been rechecking Stellarium again messing with the zoom, on Dec. 3 the sun rose dead center between East & South, the moon was almost completely in the west sky. Though the moon was at that height compared to the sun and to the sun's right, the moon was too far right to be able to be in the photo taken.

Lens flare doesn't sit right with me, and the moon seems to have been too far west to be in the same photo as the sun. I'm with Phage on giving up and just calling it Nibiru.


edit on 8-12-2012 by JibbyJedi because: tyop



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:14 PM
link   
reply to post by JibbyJedi
 





In the full moon near the sun photo I posted, the source claims that is the fading full moon in the early morning hours. It's not my photo so I cant verify it personally.

Cross that source off your list of sources.



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:16 PM
link   
I have heard (can't remember the link or website name but they were talking to an informat that worked at NASA) that Nibiru is a brown star (planet) that used to be as bright as our sun, the NASA person also said that the sun illuminates it & some areas will see it while others won't.

He said its like an eclipse some areas will see more of it.



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Spacespider
 

As I said. You cannot really see the Sun because of the glare.

Oh alright. It's Nibiru...again.
That planet that somehow can never be seen with the naked eye but only with cellphone cameras. That planet that always just happens to appear on a line between the Sun and the center of the image.

We're doomed.


You cannot see the Whole Sky...because of the glare. that is why you would not see anything else up there if looking at and shooting the sun.

If this where a real object with it's own light source and far away compared to how it looks....it could be....you know.



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:22 PM
link   
Here,
point your camera at the same place again, put it on video mode.

While recording, rotate the camera 90-180 degrees. What do you see?



Nibiru is moving!



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lonewulph
Here,
point your camera at the same place again, put it on video mode.

While recording, rotate the camera 90-180 degrees. What do you see?



Nibiru is moving!


I know your joking, but sure I'll do that, if it's sunny tomorrow morning. I will also take more pics to try and duplicate the effect.

I have looked at other lens flare photos and I can't find one that has a cloud or contrail blocking the flare.. Even when the Sun is somewhat obscured. I will keep looking though.



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by JibbyJedi
 





In the full moon near the sun photo I posted, the source claims that is the fading full moon in the early morning hours. It's not my photo so I cant verify it personally.

Cross that source off your list of sources.


The source didn't say it was Nibiru. He said it was the moon. Or wait...the moon is a logical theory here, so cross the source off right?

I say reflection...lens flare no. Most if not all modern non super HD cameras have the lens, plus overlapping piece of glass or plastic. If there was any size planet that close to the sun, and that big, there would be no way to keep it a secret.
edit on 8-12-2012 by DragonFire1024 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Artlicious

Originally posted by Havox
Pretty sure if it were Nibiru it would be visible still, and in more places.


I know, that's what I'm thinking too. But what if Nibiru is different and can only be seen in certain light? Maybe the contrails add something to the atmosphere in conjunction with the rising sun that makes it show up? I should note that I did not see this with my naked eye that morning. But I am pretty sure this IS NOT LENS FLARE.. that doesn't make sense if you inspect it closely. Also I have 2 photos taken seconds apart from each other and it is in both of them.


I've been wondering that same thing, it seems like the nibiru talk dies down, but then it revives again with different ppl claiming seeing 2 suns and trying to get pics only to be attacked for not being smart enough to realize it's a lens flare.... so that makes me wonder if maybe there really is something up there behind the sun, and the orbit of it is the reason some can see it on one day and not the next. I'm not sure if I buy into the whole planet x thing, but I do find it a fascinating idea



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jusvistn

Originally posted by Artlicious

Originally posted by Havox
Pretty sure if it were Nibiru it would be visible still, and in more places.


I know, that's what I'm thinking too. But what if Nibiru is different and can only be seen in certain light? Maybe the contrails add something to the atmosphere in conjunction with the rising sun that makes it show up? I should note that I did not see this with my naked eye that morning. But I am pretty sure this IS NOT LENS FLARE.. that doesn't make sense if you inspect it closely. Also I have 2 photos taken seconds apart from each other and it is in both of them.


I've been wondering that same thing, it seems like the nibiru talk dies down, but then it revives again with different ppl claiming seeing 2 suns and trying to get pics only to be attacked for not being smart enough to realize it's a lens flare.... so that makes me wonder if maybe there really is something up there behind the sun, and the orbit of it is the reason some can see it on one day and not the next. I'm not sure if I buy into the whole planet x thing, but I do find it a fascinating idea


Then where are the pictures? There should be thousands of pictures. We live in an age where almost everyone has the ability to capture such "planets" with, especially in this case, a standard digital camera.



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:41 PM
link   
reply to post by DragonFire1024
 



The source didn't say it was Nibiru. He said it was the moon. Or wait...the moon is a logical theory here, so cross the source off right?

Not only did the source say it was the Moon but a "Fading full Moon". Do you NOT see the problem with that?
Check phase and size.



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:42 PM
link   
Oh lookie here:


edit on 8-12-2012 by DragonFire1024 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by DragonFire1024
 



The source didn't say it was Nibiru. He said it was the moon. Or wait...the moon is a logical theory here, so cross the source off right?

Not only did the source say it was the Moon but a "Fading full Moon". Do you NOT see the problem with that?
Check phase and size.



See my post above this one...what he says doesn't matter in this case. The photographic evidence speaks for itself.
edit on 8-12-2012 by DragonFire1024 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:45 PM
link   
reply to post by DragonFire1024
 





Then where are the pictures? There should be thousands of pictures.

Something like this?



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by DragonFire1024
Oh lookie here:


edit on 8-12-2012 by DragonFire1024 because: (no reason given)



Whats that red spot to the right of the Moon on that first image?



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Artlicious

Originally posted by DragonFire1024
Oh lookie here:


edit on 8-12-2012 by DragonFire1024 because: (no reason given)



Whats that red spot to the right of the Moon on that first image?


Looks like maybe venus or planet x



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by DragonFire1024
 





Then where are the pictures? There should be thousands of pictures.

Something like this?


Reflections...I mean that is a clear example of a reflection. What I post above, and what the "blogger" posted, was examples of the moon near the sun, all of which are green. If the image the OP posted is not a reflection, it's the moon. Not only do we have evidence of examples, we actually have star charts to prove it. So unless there are thousands of pictures of everyone claiming a new planet is in our solar system, then we are wasting our time arguing about something that doesn't matter...at all.



posted on Dec, 8 2012 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Druscilla
 


Interesting that Jupiter took a large hit from an asteroid today !






top topics



 
24
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join