Heff..........Please allow me to ask a question pertinent to the overall content of this thread - who are they
that you often refer to in your
For myself - I have a very clear and well researched idea about who they
are, and I am quite willing to say it out loud and very clearly for my
readers in all that I would write, and in any oral arguments and/or presentations that I would give to the listening public. But as I read your
material here on ATS (all of it btw) I couldn't help but wonder if you are aware of who they
really are. If not I think you should be, or at
the very least you should be willing to acknowledge the fact that you do not know who is meant by they
- hence the reason for the oversight.
If I were writing in a manner such as you have been presenting to us here on ATS over the past few months I surely would have identified who
are. Is there a problem with that kind of identification here on ATS or is it just a personal omission?
Whatever the reason this lack of identification takes much of the fire out of your writing and renders it in many ways "incredible." By that I mean
your thesis loses a certain amount of credibility much in the way that a newspaper journalist loses credibility when he attributes his discoveries to
an anonymous or otherwise "unknown source."
So - would you mind telling us who they
Notwithstanding the facts that the outright fascist inspired "Governments and Corporations are partnering, on several fronts to control just
about every facet of our lives - especially in the areas of policing us, controlling our information in and outflows, and keeping us "safe" from one
(paraphrase) you still have a responsibility to identify for the reader just who is it that is operating on behalf of these so-called
"Governments and Corporations." If I know who they really are then perhaps you know as well, or you should.
See below for just a few examples of the use of the vague, and rather non-descriptive term they
in this particular thread.
Thank you very much ...........G
"they use wealth and position to try and seize our rights."
"Over the generations they've chipped away at those rights."
This is a weakness that they have been aware of and have sought to exploit since the very beginning.
On this field the tactical nuke is media. In this regard, they are the superpowers, because they control the nukes.
But they persist. they always persist. Enough is never enough. No amount of wealth or power can sate whatever drives these men... these
little tin gods who occupy high offices and make sacrifices to their own egos for reasons I cannot even begin to understand.
.. .. .. they expend vast fortunes and lifetimes, one after another, seeking to take away what little the masses have. I guess, for some,
having is not enough. It must be the thought of making sure others do not have that drives them.
In war, this love we have for these things could be called a situational opportunity - put politely. In blunt terms. It's an unguarded and open flank.
And they know this.
So many of us make statements like "The day they come to take my rights and infringe upon my privacies, will be the day I meet them, on my
porch, with my rifle in hand."
The government doesn't want to put you in a camp, where they'll have to feed and clothe you. they've already GOT YOU in a camp where you
feed, clothe, and guard yourself. Not only that - but you also voluntarily work and will happily inform on all of the other inmates.
edit on 7-12-2012 by Gregorian because: (no reason given)