It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Whats up with the UFO at 1:04 (above the building flying away quickly) (it's pretty faint, so you have to watch in full screen)
I think the video was edited and is fake.
Originally posted by ProperlyErrant
Either that or he has an issue with trusting the government's word:
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by NavyDoc
One of the problems people have when they don't understand basic physics, and how buildings are constructed and act when compromised, is they don't understand the significant difference between a 47 story building completely collapsing into it's own footprint and a partial collapse, or roof collapse.
Originally posted by RoScoLaz
Originally posted by foodstamp "many news agencies all said the same thing"
got some links to back this up? to the best of my knowledge, only the bbc made this schoolboy error.edit on 7/12/12 by RoScoLaz because: (no reason given)edit on 7/12/12 by RoScoLaz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
This video even made a hard-core OSer like me sit back and scratch my head, then I watched the video that exploited OP’s video as a Hoax.
It leads me to wonder, why has this not yet been moved to the Hoax Bin.
my favorite was that control demolition expert from Europe, who never knew about WTC7
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
This video even made a hard-core OSer like me sit back and scratch my head, then I watched the video that exploited OP’s video as a Hoax.
It leads me to wonder, why has this not yet been moved to the Hoax Bin.
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
The bottom line, something is off about building 7, my favorite was that control demolition expert from Europe, who never knew about WTC7, he was shown a video of it collapsing and he wasn`t immediately told about the what and when. He called it a controlled demolition, then was told when and where and was shocked.
His conclusion, 100% sure it was controlled demolition, and he wasn`t a truther just an expert in his field.
Originally posted by davjan4
The fact that those 3 building came down as a result of controlled demolition is so obvious as to be laughable. If they came down due to fire, all the building demo companies would be out of business. Want a building to come down perfectly? Just light up some jet fuel. Your building will come down in it's footprint no matter where the fire is.
An inside job. Undeniable. The only question is who did it and why? Who was probably a combonation of the US and some other entity. The why would be a reason to put the police state in high gear in the US and justification to get into the Middle East.
I do love my country. But I now fear my government. What's next...? A littel nuke? EMP? Hoover Dam? Or just a slow (but every increasing) economic collapse.
edit on 6-12-2012 by davjan4 because: removed last line. Too off topic.
1:20 You can see windows being blown out just before the floors where the windows are gone move down toward the ground.