Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
Originally posted by randomname
reply to post by boncho
exactly, it doesn't take millions of years to create life like evolutionists say.
maybe you should go to africa and waste your life looking for the missing link.
not even a human missing link, a missing link for any of the 8 million species on earth. surely there's got to be one.
just one. but there isn't.
Well by the term 'missing link' I assume you mean a transient fossil showing species changing through time......Of which there are countless examples.
Including many examples showing human evolution from other primates en.wikipedia.org...
Your challenge of finding just one, seems to suggest you have a serious lack of education about the subject.
Evolution should not even be considered science.
First in order for evolution to be possible both male and female must have evolved at exactly the same time. Modern science has proven that although
all life is 98-99% the same no two species can breed. And in the rare case where two slightly different animals can breed the young produced are
infertile. Further damaging the claim of Evolution.
One of the websites actually claim that two separate humanoids evolved in separate locations. One in Africa and one in Europe. The claim continues
that the humanoids from Africa went and mated with the Neanderthals in Europe. Current science theory, real science, suggests that this is simply not
In order to believe in Evolution we must throw out all known science, you know the stuff that is formulated by scientific theory, and start down the
path of assumption. Starts sounding like this.
Although we cannot reproduce any of the hundreds of complex situations that we believe would cause evolution we still believe it. Although every
piece of evidence we provide is based on at least one of these assumptions we will call it fact. This is the theory of evolution, quite circular
don't you think?
You see Evolution is not science. Evolution is a belief in Origins and development that is based on assumptions and best guesses, based on what is
observed without the need for scientific theory to prove the first assumption is even possible.
As a Christian who believes in a young earth, literal creation story from Genesis, I find it impossible to debate anything. My beliefs are not so
hard lined that they could not change based on irrefutable evidence, simply none has been provided. I spent about 2 years studding evolution
intently. I came to realize that we have no proof that Evolution is even possible, adaptation sure but evolution no.
I know for a fact that God is real; this is not debatable in my mind. Everything built must have a builder. Thus modern science and scientific theory
would suggest that DNA must have been designed by a builder. Creation or Evolution/ID, it doesn't matter. Currently there are only two answers for
DNA, God or I don't know. You can continue to ignore the blatantly, in your face, obvious truth that there is a builder. Or you can simply sit there
bewildered saying I don't know.
Evolutionists look at the world through the lens of evolution. And because of this everything they see points to Evolution. While outnumbered
creationist look at the exact same experiment and the exat same result and see how it fits within the bounds of being created. In my opinion to rule
out a creator when looking at results is simply bad science, since good science points to a builder.
edit on 8-12-2012 by sacgamer25 because: (no reason given)