I can see your point and can understand your frustration. This is probably the only sympathetic ear you will find around here. Good luck.

All i have to say is look at the casualties on either side. israel is killing thousands of civilians per year while israeli deaths are pretty much non existent by comparison thanks to the anti-missile defense the U.S has given them.

Also, israel has nukes but the IAEA/U.N refuses to conduct any investigation. its common knowledge that they have nukes and a majority of the information on how to build said nukes was stolen from the U.S.

Also, israel used chemical weapons (Phosphorus weapons) on gaza a few years ago but i guess you forgot about that.

israel is clearly the victim in this situation.

The only thing that has happened in the last few weeks is the world has woken up and realised that Israel is NOT the victim and that they are in fact in the wrong, the world has spoken and what is Israel's response? They state that they don't care, well it seems that they care what the UN thinks when they bring cartoon bombs in front of them and urge the UN to stop Iran but when things go against them they brush it off. The people are no longer blind to the lies and deceit of rouge nations and all I can say is.......about bloody time.

The UN vote to upgrade the status of "Palestine" to a non member observer status was something of a diplomatic defeat for Israel, so the Israelis responded with a controversial political initiative of its own: building 3,000 new homes in the biblical heartland of Judea and Samaria (the so called 'West Bank') and East Jerusalem, infuriating the US, EU, UK, France, Spain, Denmark etc in the process.

The world accused Israel of provocation and praised the new "Palestine" at the same time.
The irony in all of this, however:
By turning to the UN to upgrade their status, the Palestinians violated their obligations set down in the Oslo Accords, which stipulate that they can only become a state via direct negotiations with Israel.
On the other hand, Oslo accords do not require Israel to stop construction in the settlements, despite Palestinian and international claims to the contrary.

Europe and US have been interferring Israels election campaign by accusing Netanyahu government of creating obstacles to peace. (Obama still wants to teach Netanyahu a lesson because he supported Mitt Romney in the US elections).
But Europe lost all credibility with Israel when France and Spain (amongst others) voted for Palestinian statehood at the UN, and Germany and Britain abstained.
Europe's excuse was that it needed to strengthen Abbas after Hamas got a boost in popularity for bombarding Israel with rockets during the Gaza conflict. However, the decisive factor in convincing the Europeans to support "Palestine" was the Palestinian Authority's promise to resume negotiations with Israel without preconditions immediately after the UN vote.
But when Israel announced the new settlement construction, the Palestinians had a convenient excuse not to deliver. After all, why should they negotiate when the world is ready to hand them a state and blame Israel for any lack of progress?