It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bers81
I't's just for US citizens evacuation if needed. And show how cool they are
Originally posted by Dustytoad
reply to post by Bers81
No that carrier group with what was it some 70 fighter bombers? That's a blow up Syria Force...
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Dustytoad
reply to post by Bers81
No that carrier group with what was it some 70 fighter bombers? That's a blow up Syria Force...
No, it's not. It's the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group. It DOES NOT HAVE "70 fighter bombers" to start with. It has a bunch of helicopters and a few harrier jets along with a couple thousand Marines. It's there for evacuation of American citizens from Israel should that conflict get worse. It's "off ths coast of Syria" because the Eastern coast of the med isn't very big. An ARG has about ten ships. If they sail up and down the coast it takes a few hours before they have to turn around again. It's also "off the coast of Lebanon", "off the coast of Cyprus," and "off the coast" of any country over there because of it.
The Iwo Jima is not exactly an "aircraft carrier" in the way we use the term in modern times. It's not a CVN. It's displacement is about 40,000 tons compared to an "aircraft carrier" at 100,000 tons. They just spent about seven months in the Persian Gulf. They were headed home and made it as far as Spain before they were turned around and sent to Israel. What you have is several thousand pissed off Sailors and Marines who are out of Diet Coke and want very much to be back at Norfolk.
So relax and stop with the hyperbole. Nobody is there to "blow up Syria." That's completely absurd.
edit on 12/5/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by micmerci
reply to post by Krono
The Royal Navy is not the US Navy.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Dustytoad
reply to post by Bers81
No that carrier group with what was it some 70 fighter bombers? That's a blow up Syria Force...
No, it's not. It's the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group. It DOES NOT HAVE "70 fighter bombers" to start with. It has a bunch of helicopters and a few harrier jets along with a couple thousand Marines. It's there for evacuation of American citizens from Israel should that conflict get worse. It's "off ths coast of Syria" because the Eastern coast of the med isn't very big. An ARG has about ten ships. If they sail up and down the coast it takes a few hours before they have to turn around again. It's also "off the coast of Lebanon", "off the coast of Cyprus," and "off the coast" of any country over there because of it.
The Iwo Jima is not exactly an "aircraft carrier" in the way we use the term in modern times. It's not a CVN. It's displacement is about 40,000 tons compared to an "aircraft carrier" at 100,000 tons. They just spent about seven months in the Persian Gulf. They were headed home and made it as far as Spain before they were turned around and sent to Israel. What you have is several thousand pissed off Sailors and Marines who are out of Diet Coke and want very much to be back at Norfolk.
So relax and stop with the hyperbole. Nobody is there to "blow up Syria." That's completely absurd.
edit on 12/5/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by aarys
www.debka.com...
I know its Debka. But if they are there they must really be there. Seems like a very large number of ships ready for action. Funny how fast they got there considering it was only a few days ago the said they were watching chemical weapons being moved. I feel we are very close to Syrias demise like Libya.
Originally posted by anton74
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Dustytoad
reply to post by Bers81
No that carrier group with what was it some 70 fighter bombers? That's a blow up Syria Force...
No, it's not. It's the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group. It DOES NOT HAVE "70 fighter bombers" to start with. It has a bunch of helicopters and a few harrier jets along with a couple thousand Marines. It's there for evacuation of American citizens from Israel should that conflict get worse. It's "off ths coast of Syria" because the Eastern coast of the med isn't very big. An ARG has about ten ships. If they sail up and down the coast it takes a few hours before they have to turn around again. It's also "off the coast of Lebanon", "off the coast of Cyprus," and "off the coast" of any country over there because of it.
The Iwo Jima is not exactly an "aircraft carrier" in the way we use the term in modern times. It's not a CVN. It's displacement is about 40,000 tons compared to an "aircraft carrier" at 100,000 tons. They just spent about seven months in the Persian Gulf. They were headed home and made it as far as Spain before they were turned around and sent to Israel. What you have is several thousand pissed off Sailors and Marines who are out of Diet Coke and want very much to be back at Norfolk.
So relax and stop with the hyperbole. Nobody is there to "blow up Syria." That's completely absurd.
edit on 12/5/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
The Poster is talking about the Eisenhower, not the Iwo Jima.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by anton74
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Dustytoad
reply to post by Bers81
No that carrier group with what was it some 70 fighter bombers? That's a blow up Syria Force...
No, it's not. It's the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group. It DOES NOT HAVE "70 fighter bombers" to start with. It has a bunch of helicopters and a few harrier jets along with a couple thousand Marines. It's there for evacuation of American citizens from Israel should that conflict get worse. It's "off ths coast of Syria" because the Eastern coast of the med isn't very big. An ARG has about ten ships. If they sail up and down the coast it takes a few hours before they have to turn around again. It's also "off the coast of Lebanon", "off the coast of Cyprus," and "off the coast" of any country over there because of it.
The Iwo Jima is not exactly an "aircraft carrier" in the way we use the term in modern times. It's not a CVN. It's displacement is about 40,000 tons compared to an "aircraft carrier" at 100,000 tons. They just spent about seven months in the Persian Gulf. They were headed home and made it as far as Spain before they were turned around and sent to Israel. What you have is several thousand pissed off Sailors and Marines who are out of Diet Coke and want very much to be back at Norfolk.
So relax and stop with the hyperbole. Nobody is there to "blow up Syria." That's completely absurd.
edit on 12/5/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
The Poster is talking about the Eisenhower, not the Iwo Jima.
And the Eisenhower is in the Persian Gulf, NOT off the coast of Syria! For the Eisenhower to get off the coast of Syria it would have to go through the Suez Canal. Right now it's about 1,000 miles away from Syria.edit on 12/5/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Curio
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by anton74
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Dustytoad
reply to post by Bers81
No that carrier group with what was it some 70 fighter bombers? That's a blow up Syria Force...
No, it's not. It's the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group. It DOES NOT HAVE "70 fighter bombers" to start with. It has a bunch of helicopters and a few harrier jets along with a couple thousand Marines. It's there for evacuation of American citizens from Israel should that conflict get worse. It's "off ths coast of Syria" because the Eastern coast of the med isn't very big. An ARG has about ten ships. If they sail up and down the coast it takes a few hours before they have to turn around again. It's also "off the coast of Lebanon", "off the coast of Cyprus," and "off the coast" of any country over there because of it.
The Iwo Jima is not exactly an "aircraft carrier" in the way we use the term in modern times. It's not a CVN. It's displacement is about 40,000 tons compared to an "aircraft carrier" at 100,000 tons. They just spent about seven months in the Persian Gulf. They were headed home and made it as far as Spain before they were turned around and sent to Israel. What you have is several thousand pissed off Sailors and Marines who are out of Diet Coke and want very much to be back at Norfolk.
So relax and stop with the hyperbole. Nobody is there to "blow up Syria." That's completely absurd.
edit on 12/5/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
The Poster is talking about the Eisenhower, not the Iwo Jima.
And the Eisenhower is in the Persian Gulf, NOT off the coast of Syria! For the Eisenhower to get off the coast of Syria it would have to go through the Suez Canal. Right now it's about 1,000 miles away from Syria.edit on 12/5/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
It passed through the Suez Canal on the 1st December and into the Med. That's the information I've found anyway. Where are you getting your info from? (not challenging you - just want to make sure where it is )
Originally posted by schuyler
I stand corrected. The Eisenhower is interrupting its scheduled deployment in the Gulf. headed to Norfolk for repairs to its flight deck. Info from stratfor.com. That leaves one carrier in the Gulf. Confirmed by Stratfor.com today.