And all of you official 9/11 believers still do not want to admit that a planned PUBLIC demolition is totally different from a planned HIDDEN
They remove for a public one, nearly all obstacles for a fast gravitational collapse that is going to proceed after their charges are set off. The
outer facade with windows and panels, the inner drywalls, brick walls and concrete walls. The elevator cores, the concrete floors in the planned
"kink" areas, all that will be removed to be sure that their public demo-job goes as planned.
In the WTC's hidden demo's, all inside and outside structures in the floors under the impacted floors were still present, and thus acted as effective
sound mufflers for HE cutter charges going off in the core columns regions.
Drywall dividers, office equipment, light brick walls, doors, anything else.
And HE cutter charges exploding is not the big boooommm you all seem to think, it's more like a somewhat louder whip crack. A cracking sound, that's
easily muffled by demo-blankets, and eventually water. Especially water.
The reason why I suspect TB's have been used in conjunction with HE cutter charges : you see those rings of explosive smoke clouds spit out from all
windows on one floor, all around the building's four facades, at about every third floor proceeding further down, when the global collapses
And they were starting UNDER the lowest impact-hole floor levels.
See the above video's in my huge EVIDENCE for demolition post.
And you also didn't notice, that since those explosions happened 80 to 90 floors up in the sky, it took about 1.1 seconds (333 m/s) for their
accompanying explosive sounds to reach the camera's at the ground level straight under it.
And thus they needed explosives with a low frequency sound level at ground level to mimic collapse sounds, 1 second later or at the same time to DROWN
those repetitive boom boom boom boom sounds from high up (see video from -BoneZ- in my above huge post), to fool the camera microphones, and the ears
of all people standing around the towers, to let them believe those first ground level explosives sounds were the real onset of the faked
gravitational collapses. That way, the ground explosion sounds overwhelmed the following top floors explosive sounds, and most people would
automatically thought that those were the first sounds of a then further progressing collapse.
All other cutter charges sounds will have drowned in the ongoing collapse sounds.
Thus, it were only the first 2 seconds that made a difference, in that small time span they had to prepare low frequency sounds that would overwhelm
the sharp cracks of the HE cutter charges exploding.
A fine example is that famous BBC camera man running for his life, away from the collapsing South Tower, with his camera in his hand, but pointing
backwards to the tower collapsing.
That's the same footage through which I proved to a whole bunch of my non-believer co-conspiracy friends, that they were totally mistaken when they
kept repeating texts from others, that said it fell at free-fall speed (Bullocks) and fell in less than 10 seconds (Bullocks too), it took in fact
about 22 seconds to fall completely to ground level, all simply to see and count for yourself in that fleeing BBC cameraman video.
I however was always left with one nagging question :
Why were basement explosions needed at the start of a circa 1 hour deployment to proceed to a faked gravitational collapse?
Why were William Rodriguez and his 22 other ear and eyewitnesses firmly holding to their witnessed pre-impact huge basement explosions?
I still don't realize which logical reason they had when they planned such risky explosions, just a few seconds before the planes impacted (It
happened at BOTH Tower plane impacts).
Perhaps they had to be sure that those huge steel columns at the deepest basements were severed, and that they had time to CHECK that they really
were, before the Towers were demolished from the top down.
Those 'spires' we saw coming down in slow motion at the end of one global collapse perhaps had to have a loose connection to the bedrock, during that
top down collapse. So that those lowest cuts could act as hinges when they exploded the last cutter charges at the two lowest mechanical floors to cut
those last center columns, those free standing pieces of 'spires', which then at last easily slipped down along the still erect part of the same
Because they needed free space beside all of them, so they could slide down elegantly perpendicular to the ground, as we saw those spires do.
First primary cutter charges exploding and their white hot plasma streams cutting those huge, thick columns, then secondary displacement charges just
above the cuts, to knock and bent them a tiny bit sideways, so they can slip down when those same columns were cut inside the 2 lowest mechanical
In all the demolition theories there's one seemingly huge problem.
How did they hide all these diagonally cut columns ends caused by standard cut demolition cutter charges, for their own clean-up crews?
There are a few indications found over the years what their modus operandus could have been :
1. It was not allowed to bring camera's to the clean-up job, for anybody in those crews. Only contracted photographers were allowed in, and they had a
tight security squad watching their every move.
See the statements and YouTube videos from that former ground zero photographer with the German surname that fled to Buenos Aires, Argentina, because
he suddenly got a wife-murder charge filed against him, after he went public that his stack of held back and copied and backed-up clean-up photo's
showed some interesting evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed to be.
His last appearance a few weeks ago was in a video, shot in B.A. Argentina, in front of a fountain, together with his new Argentinian wife, where he
explained that his extradition (back to the USA) case in Argentina was still looked upon by the Argentinian judges, who found the evidence send to
them by the US DoJ was a bit thin. While the US judge triomphantically says in the video that they were sure he murdered his wife and they had
sufficient evidence for that.
The Argentinian judge seemed to think otherwise.
This is the exact way they once tried to frame me too, sending phony "evidence" to the prosecutor in the country I then resided, asking to extradite
me to their country. That prosecutor told friends of mine later that he never saw a more mysterious conundrum than that so called "evidence for
wrongdoing" they send him on me. Nothing happened, by the way. (It's years ago, don't get excited about it)
But I knew from that time on how they operate, and I certainly don't like their dirty tricks.
2. Many statements from former first responders surfaced, that in all the days that they were allowed back in, they had to endure crazy long
interrogations after their work was done late evening or even at night, by agencies asking them lots of weird questions. Then there came a day that
they no longer were allowed in, and they got thanked for their patriotic assistance in the first weeks after 9/11. They were told that professionals
were now taking over. That was around the time that the rubble heap reached levels where eventual cut columns could be unearthed.
It was the same time that the NYPD and the FDNY personnel still frantically was searching for the bodies of their lost comrades, and suddenly were
held back from the whole site. They were furious. And protested furiously.
3. Many columns were cut diagonally all over the clean up area in full daylight, and that could be one of the reasons why so many photographers from
behind the perimeter fences have shot pictures from those, and would-be demo-debunkers could easily weaken any arguments for diagonally placed column
cutter charges, by showing those abundantly available pictures and even video's from welders that were cutting columns with acetylene/oxygen burners
However. In my country I have watched demolition crews taking buildings apart, and they did not cut steel columns that way. They attached a steel
cable halter (noose?) around the column far above the cut, stretched it, and then cut the column horizontally.
I asked them why not do it diagonally and let it slip down by its own weight. They said they had no death wishes, that was far too dangerous. Then I
asked why not do it as I saw it done in New York, without saying where.
Their answer seemed to me a quite logical one :
"We have to pay for the acetylene and oxygen gas cylinders, since we take the jobs on a fixed end-price, so tell me why we would make much longer
cuts, when a horizontal cut is the most economical and safest one, in terms of spend gas and time spend on cutting?
And it is dangerous to cut diagonally, since the column can torsion at the last cut instead of sliding down, and we can get hot molten steel all over
us, or even get the whole column over us if it topples to the wrong side.
Our method with the cable and the horizontal cut is the safest, since the cable is under slight tension from the crane, at an angle away from us
welders, and it opens up a gap for us that way, the further we cut. And thus the molten iron will be blown away from the cut we are making, thus
preventing that both column ends will fuse together again, which would surely happen when you use a diagonal cut without a cable noose. And again, why
make a two times longer cut, spending two times more gas, even when you also use a cable and noose? "
They cut a "U-form" horizontal cut, first around three sides of the column and heat up the last remains solid steel part until it is red glowing, then
the crane operator sets the cable under a 75 degree angle and put some more tension on the cable, so the column top end will bend towards the cable
and opens up quite a gap at that already cut "U" cut, then the cable is set at a 90 degree angle and then the welder cuts that last horizontal cut.
That way, the just cut part will not snap backward towards the welder, but upwards under the tension of the cable that is now stretched under a bigger
angle (90 degrees) than when making that first "U" cut around the column.
He explained that when you let the cable stretch under f.ex. a 75 degrees angle all the time, the cut end of the column will jump backwards when the
last piece is cut away, or depending where your cable noose is placed (too near to the cut), it will lift the lower part of the just cut column, and
the top part will hinge back on top of you.
So, these photo's are very suspicious in my books :
Photo's with diagonally cut column stumps.
With dark gray slack traces dripping off from their outer sides.
If a welder cuts such a diagonal cut, his torch gas pressure will blow the melted steel inside that column for the most part.
When a HE charge goes off on both sides of such a thick steel column, the molten steel will meet in the middle and bounce back and thus drip down the
4. The Loisaux family company, CDI Inc., the best known demolition company in the USA, was contracted to clean up ground zero. Their income depends
for a great part on government jobs, and for sure on government permits. The government could make their firm's existence very difficult when they
would not listen very careful to instructions given to them for that 9/11 clean up job.
For example to not take pieces away to their firm to test for explosives.
And for those diagonal cuts, so standard for demo jobs, they were given the same explanation as to all others was given : that's the way our welders
had to cut all still erect columns (and be so clever to ask no further questions, or else...)
5. My number 5. WTC SMOKING GUN PROOF OF EXPLOSIVE DEMOLITION CHARGES by john sosman. In the above huge post.
This is by far the best evidence for planted explosives I ever saw.
You see the long thin black muffler blanket spitting out of a WTC window, inside the explosive dust cloud that bursts out of that _ With a speed
you can easily count yourself, that never can be caused by 'compressed air from a pancaking floor segment' as some seem to think.
And you can see the exact same black long blankets got spitted out from several windows in an official demolition job, and then he put up both videos
beside each other. If you then can't see for yourself that that is an exact same type of demo muffler blanket that normally gets wrapped several times
around a pillar or column to be cut with a cutter charge, then I give up on you as an intelligent human being.
edit on 12/1/13 by LaBTop
because: Changed whip lash to whip crack.