It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FFS4000
reply to post by SpearMint
Why not, why should we not go back ? and so what if it's expensive, there are plenty of expensive things on Earth and most of those are a waste of money, i'd rather money was spent on space exploration than useless breeders. I'm with the OP, i think there is more going on than we are told
Originally posted by FFS4000
reply to post by SpearMint
Why not, why should we not go back ? and so what if it's expensive, there are plenty of expensive things on Earth and most of those are a waste of money, i'd rather money was spent on space exploration than useless breeders. I'm with the OP, i think there is more going on than we are told
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by FFS4000
reply to post by SpearMint
Why not, why should we not go back ? and so what if it's expensive, there are plenty of expensive things on Earth and most of those are a waste of money, i'd rather money was spent on space exploration than useless breeders. I'm with the OP, i think there is more going on than we are told
Because there's not much we can get out of it. Tell me why we should.
When I say it's expensive, I mean EXPENSIVE, the last estimate I heard was over 104 billion USD. Not to mention risky with our primitive rocket technology.edit on 5-12-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by FFS4000
reply to post by SpearMint
Why not, why should we not go back ? and so what if it's expensive, there are plenty of expensive things on Earth and most of those are a waste of money, i'd rather money was spent on space exploration than useless breeders. I'm with the OP, i think there is more going on than we are told
Because there's not much we can get out of it. Tell me why we should.
When I say it's expensive, I mean EXPENSIVE, the last estimate I heard was over 104 billion USD. Not to mention risky with our primitive rocket technology.edit on 5-12-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by FFS4000
reply to post by SpearMint
Why not, why should we not go back ? and so what if it's expensive, there are plenty of expensive things on Earth and most of those are a waste of money, i'd rather money was spent on space exploration than useless breeders. I'm with the OP, i think there is more going on than we are told
Because there's not much we can get out of it. Tell me why we should.
When I say it's expensive, I mean EXPENSIVE, the last estimate I heard was over 104 billion USD. Not to mention risky with our primitive rocket technology.edit on 5-12-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
I disagree...how would you or any of us (including NASA) know if it's a waste of money? You come from already accepted dogma that there is nothing of interest there. Yet we know there is water in craters and there are plenty of Moon "weirdness" to make it an interesting place to explore. This should be a number 1 goal for all man kind, not just NASA.
In conclusion, when they say "it's expensive"....it really makes no sense. What do you mean expensive...that doesn't matter. If we do not explore our solar system and the galaxy...we are doomed in the end anyway (not in the near future I know). SO this has to be our primary goal as a species. Our survival depends on it.
What is more important than survival of the species? If we are to survive, we have to learn about the universe. The Moon is the first and logical place to start learning. No amount of money lost should ever come in to play.
spending a billions upon billions of dollars and not getting much out of it.
Originally posted by MysterX
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by FFS4000
reply to post by SpearMint
Why not, why should we not go back ? and so what if it's expensive, there are plenty of expensive things on Earth and most of those are a waste of money, i'd rather money was spent on space exploration than useless breeders. I'm with the OP, i think there is more going on than we are told
Because there's not much we can get out of it. Tell me why we should.
When I say it's expensive, I mean EXPENSIVE, the last estimate I heard was over 104 billion USD. Not to mention risky with our primitive rocket technology.edit on 5-12-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
One reason to go back is to place permanent networks of deep space optical and radio telescopes on the far side...cuts out all light and radio spectrum interference there, and they don't need to carry propellent.
Another is to carry out longer term micro-gravity experimentation..from crystalography, electronics, and biological experiments, all benefit from the isolation (esp. biological research) and low gravity.
A small(ish) manned base is useful as either a launch pacility for system probes or for manned missions to either asteroids or Solar planets..a launch from the moon (after processing lunar soils for fuel) would be significantly beneficial in terms of fuel capacities and ease of launch. More onboard fuel means longer mission durations.
Then there's Lunar Helium 3 to mine, which may become the fuel that replaces oil in the short to mid time frame.
The obvious elephant in the room is Lunar based weapons and spy aparatus...
Lots of reasons to go back to the moon.
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by SpearMint
spending a billions upon billions of dollars and not getting much out of it.
Still you remain firm in your stance that you wouldn't get anything out of it.
I disagree...so we can move along I guess.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by SpearMint
spending a billions upon billions of dollars and not getting much out of it.
Still you remain firm in your stance that you wouldn't get anything out of it.
I disagree...so we can move along I guess.
Well you haven't made a counter argument.
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by SpearMint
What is, if I may as, your occupation?
What do you for a living? An accountant maybe ?
Thank God Columbus never thought about things like "getting something out of it" before setting of in to the unknown, otherwise...who knows if you would even be alive today.
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by SpearMint
spending a billions upon billions of dollars and not getting much out of it.
Still you remain firm in your stance that you wouldn't get anything out of it.
I disagree...so we can move along I guess.
Well you haven't made a counter argument.
Counter arguments are clear in my mind...you however think that nothing trumps financial calculations, so there is no point to debate it.