It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON -- Nearly two years after Wall Street waged a successful campaign to keep consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren from running the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the incoming senator will be tapped to serve on the Banking Committee, according to four sources familiar with the situation. It's a victory for progressives who battled to win her a seat on the panel that oversees the implementation of Dodd-Frank and other banking regulations.
Warren knocked out Republican Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts in the most expensive Senate contest of 2012, with Wall Street spending heavily to beat Warren, a former Harvard law professor.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by solidguy
as has been pointed out there are probably no honest politicians, but if claiming native american ancestry theough the early 90's is her worst offence I think you'd be glad to have her!
Source
During her academic career, Ms. Warren, a Harvard Law School professor, identified herself as a minority, citing her one thirty-second Cherokee blood, a fact that Republicans pounced on to try to portray her as an opportunist and a fraud. The line on her résumé does not seem to set well with some Indian members of her own party.
“If you’re going to be Native, don’t just be Native on paper,” said Lexie LaMere, a Nebraska delegate and member of the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. “What’s troubling is that she’s shown nothing in her history of being involved in Native American issues.”
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
There is absolutely zero proof that she lied about her ancestry to receive any benefits.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
There is absolutely zero proof that she lied about her ancestry to receive any benefits.
She faked being an uber-miniority to gain left wing support to get elected.
That's a pretty big benefit.
She's a proven liar and a cheater.
Having said that, given her credibility issues with something as exceptionally touchy and offensive as the Native American claims of her past....can we, just possibly, see her kept OFF those committees that have real relevance to trust and honesty in public dealing?