It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The generation and amplification of extremely low frequency (ELF)/ultra low frequency (ULF)/very low frequency (VLF) radiation in the ionosphere utilizing the High Frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) transmitter
FY 2013 Plans:
- Conduct numerical studies of ion dynamics caused by ULF, and of VLF wave propagation through the ionosphere inside density ducts created by artificial heating.
- Experimentally attempt 3-D observations of HF-induced plasma structures and potentially determine relative HF power absorption for different altitudes, frequencies and geophysical conditions.
Originally posted by Speckle
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Maybe this can help you out
newscitybuzz.com...
GWEN did not use ELF, it used LF, 30-300 kHz. Ground waves diffract and refract around the earth, they travel "in" the air and the earth. GWEN did not directly communicate with submarines, but would relay a message to and ELF facility like Clam Lake. ELF submarine communication systems use wire strung on poles between two conductors about about 30-40 miles apart, creating a large antenna with the earth circuit.
Three hundred (300) ft. of copper wire fans out in a spoke like fashion from the base of the underground system, interacting with the earth like a thin shelled conductor, radiating radio wave energy for very long distances through the ground. The USA bathes in this magnetic field which rises to 500 ft, even going down to basements, so everyone is subject to mind control.
The VLF signals travel by waves that hug the ground rather than radiate into the atmosphere. A GWEN station transmits up to a 300-mile radius, the signal dropping off sharply over distance.
You think the stations were connected to each other by wire? Good grief.
So by stringing towers and copper wire together across the country in this fashion we soon come to an acceptable length to handle some ELF waves.
300 feet? You think the range of the stations was 300 feet?
15,900,000 feet divided by 300 feet
Originally posted by Speckle
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Maybe this can help you out
newscitybuzz.com...
HAARP is an attractive target for conspiracy theorists because according to computer scientist David Naiditch, “its purpose seems deeply mysterious to the scientifically uninformed”.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
GWEN Towers Resemble Cell Phone Towers
And then there's the ultra-mini-cell tower:
Femtocells Now Outnumber Physical Cell Towers in the US
So I think there's a network here that morphed away from GWEN which the public saw as evil and became, instead, fake cell towers etc.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
With this system, as it was originally stated, in order to provide a conduit network to insure localized, predictable coverage, coast to coast, 53,000 towers would be required. (3000 miles coast to coast times 5300 feet/mile = 15,900,000 feet divided by 300 feet = 53,000 towers.) I think GWEN admitted to 58. The 53,000 towers, under this system (without knowing what improvements have been made in the 300 foot transmission distance) would only cover a contiguous section of the country 3000 miles long by 300 feet wide.
GWEN Towers Resemble Cell Phone Towers
Originally posted by luxordelphi
Although, your claimed area of expertise on HAARP, diesel engines, is not broad enough nor open enough to address HAARP as a soul catcher gadget. It takes a different sort of mental process, perhaps a homeopathic minded process, to look at that.
I find links on the internet that tell me, variously, that Eastlund, ARCO and APTI own the Eastlund patents. If this is a challenge to a links war - no thanks. If you want to discuss corporate or military industrial complex buy-out of patents in this thread - no thanks. And, Mr. Microwave, HAARP beams, tightly, in the RF, pulsed. Two-beam pulsed. Or...did I read somewhere three beams; how about four?
Your microwave garbage arguments...
Anything between 3Hz and 300GHz is still refered to as RF waves..bla bla bla...at frequencies from 2.8 - 10 MHz (HF, high frequency range).
The VLF group focuses on using HAARP to generate ELF and VLF waves through a process called modulated heating.
HAARP is located in a region where large natural currents, known as the auroral electrojet flow through the ionosphere. By turning the HF array on and off (i.e. modulating the HF power) at ELF frequencies, we can also modulate the conductivity of the ionosphere at those frequencies (Ferraro et al., 1982; Stubbe and Kopka, 1977; Tomko et al., 1980). When combined with the electric field that drives the auroral electrojet, the result is a current that oscillates and thus radiates at the modulation frequency: a ELF antenna in the ionosphere.
So our atmosphere, our ionosphere, protects us from incoming ELF. In this same way, man-made ELF frequencies, on the wrong side of the ionosphere, do not escape. They stay here, bouncing, to pre-determined trajectories, doing their dirty business of apathy entrainment.
Originally posted by Speckle
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Maybe this can help you out
newscitybuzz.com...
The amplification is more an aspect of parts of the ionosphere and inner magnetosphere.
The "Hertzian antenna" thing that was being discussed upthread is the pulse transmitter - it's basically a spark gap sort of rig.
ELF doesn't do mind control.
Between the almost perfectly conducting terrestrial surface and ionosphere, a resonating cavity is formed. Broadband electromagnetic impulses, like those from lightning flashes, fill this cavity, and create globally enveloping Schumann resonances ranging from frequencies 5 - 50 Hz (Schumann, 1952; Bliokh et al., 1980; Sentman, 1987). The nominal average frequencies observed are 7.8, 14, 20, 26, 33, 39, and 45 Hz with slight diurnal variation (Sentman and Fraser, 1991).
Scientists have suggested lately that another method may exist to accurately monitor planetary temperature. The idea is simple, though the underlying physics of the processes are complex. The method is based on the well known fact that thunderstorms and lightning strokes in many parts of the world are directly related to lower-atmospheric air temperatures. Higher temperatures produce more lightning strokes, while lower temperatures tend to depress lightning activity.
Lightning discharges occurring anywhere in the world produce electromagnetic pulses that spread away from the source. Much of the energy is quickly degraded, but some of the energy the lightning produces falls in the extremely low-frequency, long-wavelength domain of the electromagnetic spectrum. At these long wavelengths, the energy from a lightning stroke is able to circumnavigate the earth without serious degradation.
In an article published in Science, M.I.T. scientist Earle Williams (1992) constructed a powerful argument that links Schumann resonances to convection and ultimately to widespread tropical and/or global temperature. Williams concluded that a 1°C warming in the tropics should result in a fourfold increase in lightning activity, and he presented empirical data from several locations to support his conclusion.
BTW, the amount of information that you can convey with a radio signal is directly proportional to the frequency, by the time you're down to ELF the bit rate is worse than an old 300 baud modem. It doesn't really lend itself to conveying images or voices. Also, like any other EM, the minimum focal size is also related to the wavelength, so you can't make tiny foci with it.
The path loss in salt water is friggin' heinous, even for ELF, but it's a lot worse for, say HF than ELF by orders of magnitude.
Subs used to trail an active detector that was less an antenna than an e-field slope detector. Eventually they stopped trailing an array and started using a SQUID to detect the h-field component of the ELF signal. Now they don't use it at all.
Brooks Agnew was using a ground penetrating radar. It's not ELF.
Locations don't "resonate" at a frequency - I'm assuming that you're referring to an EM frequency, since you're also talking about magnetotellurics and Brooks Agnew.
Oh, also, if you HAD a resonant circuit, say a parallel tank, and it's tuned to 1MHz, and I hit it with 1.5MHz, it doesn't produce 500kHz as an effect. It just doesn't resonate. Production of sum and difference frequencies is a whole other matter.
Back to magnetotellurics, you can use any source that causes changes in the local magnetic field. What you have to do is put down sensors in a grid over the area you want to survey, and you wait. If you don't want to wait, you use HAARP, I suppose . Otherwise, you will get the signal you want at sunrise, sunset or if you get a bad thunderstorm somewhere in the vicinity, but not where you're at. You want one maybe 50 miles off.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
So is this (does it look like) the pictures one finds on the net of Tesla with two giant poles and huge lightning in between?
ELF does entrainment. Don't quibble. It does it with all things, including living things. Here is an oft linked article, one of the older ones on the net, talking about the effects of various ELF.
It doesn't ask, but I will: which came first - the global warming or the man-made lightning? Or the man-made ELF?
Between the almost perfectly conducting terrestrial surface and ionosphere, a resonating cavity is formed circumnavigate the earth without serious degradation.
In a detailed, interconnected system like our earth, the consequences of concentrated heating in a region as volatile as the ionosphere, can't be grasped because they are unknown. The production of ELF du jour uses the entire globe as a laboratory. And it uses each individual human being as a guinea pig.
In the case of ELF and entrainment, the frequency is the information.
We don't have to worry about ELF hitting us in salt water. The submarine crew need to worry about this. They need to worry about what it will do to their attitudes. Apathy, when operating a nuclear sub, would seem dangerous. Also, zombies, in charge of a nuclear sub, doesn't sound like a good idea.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by luxordelphi
The CERN facility can also break down the atmosphere with their collisions.
What does CERN have with anything in this thread? And even then, why do you mention CERN and not some other accelerator facility?
The temperature and pressure conditions anywhere in the atmosphere can be re-created within the chambers, and all experimental conditions can be controlled and measured, including the ‘cosmic ray’ intensity and the contents of the chambers.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
Don't use what at all?
Originally posted by luxordelphi
He never said he was using ELF. You said he said that. HAARP isn't using ELF either. What about it?
Everything moves. Nothing stands still. There is no isolation. Everything is interconnected.
So is this like canned food? What about the sub-atomic particles then? They dead?
In a cloud chamber, a tank. So what? And it does not create ionospheric conditions because they aren't studying the effects of cosmic rays on the ionosphere.
They are creating conditions, without HAARP and without the ionosphere, that relate to Eastlund's cosmic ray patent for creating ionospheric conditions at sea level. And because the act of doing this was being questioned insofar as - is it being done.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by luxordelphi
Don't use what at all?
ELF. It's one with last winter's snows.
We dropped it.
Almost a year after the U.S. Navy pulled the plug on its massive submarine communication system in northern Wisconsin, the job of dismantling Project ELF is still a work in progress| with a final plan not yet set.
"It is not a quick, easy or clean process. It is messy, dirty and takes time," said Tim Ward, operations manager for the facility near Clam Lake. "Ultimately, we all hope it is for the greater good."