Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
BTW even if these were spark gaps they would not ba "SF6 spark gaps" - these would be "air spark gaps" - since the insulating material between them is
air, not SF6 (Sulphur Hexafluoride).
So, Gaul, in the interests of building the HAARP array from the ground up, and understanding the difference between HIPAS and HAARP and why HAARP
would content itself with less than half the ERP that HIPAS was capable of at the time it disappeared into the night:
Because it does not need the power for its purpose.
how exactly do you know that there are no spark gaps of whatever type at HAARP?
I do not know there are no spark gaps of any kind at HAARP - sorry if I gave that impression.
However I am quite confident here are no spark gaps in the IRI - the Ionospheric Research Instrument because there is no need for spark gaps in radio
transmitters, and the IRI is a radio transmitter. Similarly with the VHF and UHF radars, HF receivers, and optical cameras. These also need no spark
And the antenna array, which you seem to think should be sparking and arcing because apparently you think it comprises spark gaps between the
antennas, also has no need of spark gaps.
And if the gap is filled, with SF 6, how is it a gap?
In the same way the gap between you and the computer monitor you are reading this on is filled with air.
Please appreciate my dilemma: I know that you know absolutely squat about HAARP.
Apparently I know HAARP is a radio transmitter - so that would give lie to your presumption. So yeah - I can see you have a dilemma continuing to
hold that though as true - I believe the term is cognitive dissonance
I have openly admitted knowing just slightly above squat about HAARP in the first thread on HAARP I ever made. We know that Tesla and
Eastlund understood HAARP.
Lots of people understand HAARP - the technicians and scientists who work on it, people who study its results - why be so limited with your list??
We know that one of the few people able to actually contribute salient points in this thread had a number of their posts removed.
Perhaps s/he should have made salient points in those posts then.
In fact a lot of people have made salient points.
Where does that leave us?
I think it leaves you in a quandary - since you have all these problems to sort out, despite having been given answers to at least some of them ages
ago, and the rest of them in this thread.
Especially since you apparently know what I know purely by some interactions on here where you have generally shown that you have no idea what I know
But that's your problem - I will continue to provide you with such information I do know from time to time when it seems like the appropriate answer -
but whether you choose to comprehend and/or believe it or not is entirely up to you.
edit on 28-12-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no
edit on 28-12-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: fix quoting